Dealing with Attrition When Refreshment Samples are Available: An Application to the Turkish Household Labor Force Survey
estimated in the context of a three-state labor market application. Futher, strict bounds on the estimated probabilities are calculated using Manski’s bounds approach. Empirical findings confirm that attrition is non-ignorable, and neither MAR nor HW adequately model it.
|Date of creation:||2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Aviv Nevo, 2001.
"Using Weights to Adjust for Sample Selection When Auxiliary Information is Available,"
NBER Technical Working Papers
0275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nevo, Aviv, 2003. "Using Weights to Adjust for Sample Selection When Auxiliary Information Is Available," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 43-52, January.
- Brownstone, David & Valletta, Robert G, 1996.
"Modeling Earnings Measurement Error: A Multiple Imputation Approach,"
University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers
qt3gb0k9b5, University of California Transportation Center.
- Brownstone, David & Valletta, Robert G, 1996. "Modeling Earnings Measurement Error: A Multiple Imputation Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 78(4), pages 705-17, November.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed009:353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.