Author
Listed:
- Lu Tang
- Chao Liu
- Chenhui Ding
- Othman Mohamed
Abstract
This research breaks away from the existing literature that focuses only on the relationship between environmental regulations and employment size and employment structure, and focuses on the employment creation effect, destruction effect and the net effect of environmental regulations on employment. Accordingly, employing a two-tier stochastic frontier model, this research will answer whether the bilateral effects of environmental regulation on employment exist, which is larger or smaller, the net effect using provincial panel data in China from 2011 to 2020. Research results show that the creation effect makes employment higher than the frontier level by 3.18%, while the destruction effect makes employment lower than the frontier level by 4.58%, and finally the destruction effect dominates with the two-tier effects making employment lower than the frontier level by 1.40%. Furthermore, it was found that the lower the level of environmental regulation implementation, the greater its destruction effect. Moreover, from different human capital perspectives, environmental regulations have the least damaging effect on the low-skilled group, followed by the high-skilled group, and the most significant effect on the medium-skilled group. The destruction effect exhibits regional heterogeneity, sequentially weakening from the east to the central and western regions. The findings of this study hold particular significance for governmental entities in determining the stringency of environmental regulatory measures. It effectively promotes the government’s enforcement of environmental regulation policies, and has significant implications for achieving the dual advantages of “environmental protection†and “full employment†in society.
Suggested Citation
Lu Tang & Chao Liu & Chenhui Ding & Othman Mohamed, 2024.
"Environmental Regulation on Employment: Creation or Destruction?—Measurement and Calculation Based on Two-Tier Stochastic Frontier Model,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241281225
DOI: 10.1177/21582440241281225
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241281225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.