IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v33y2001i3p453-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment

Author

Listed:
  • David Adams
  • Alan Disberry
  • Norman Hutchison
  • Thomas Munjoma

Abstract

The authors examine the nature and significance of ownership constraints within the urban redevelopment process. They suggest that such constraints derive from the distinctiveness of land as a commodity, the imperfect nature of the land market, the behavioural characteristics of landowners, and the institutional context for land ownership, exchange, and development. From this, they propose a common definition of ownership constraints as a basis for their practical classification. This divides ownership constraints between those that concern deficiencies in, or limitations to, the extent of ownership rights in potential development land and those that relate specifically to the strategies, interests, and actions of those who hold such rights. The various types of ownership constraints that fall under these headings are then explored, with research presented into the extent to which they each disrupted plans to use, market, develop, or purchase eighty large redevelopment sites in four British cities between 1991 and 1995.

Suggested Citation

  • David Adams & Alan Disberry & Norman Hutchison & Thomas Munjoma, 2001. "Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(3), pages 453-477, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:3:p:453-477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epn.sagepub.com/content/33/3/453.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nyuying Wang & Oleg Golubchikov & Wei Chen & Zhigao Liu, 2020. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Post-Industrial Beijing: Communism, Neoliberalism, and Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(12), pages 1-1, June.
    2. Gallagher, Rachel & Liu, Yan & Sigler, Thomas, 2019. "Parcel amalgamation as a mechanism for achieving urban consolidation through densification: The fixity of property boundaries over time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Joaquin Ameller & Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Corinne Merly, 2020. "The contribution of economic science to brownfield redevelopment: a review," Post-Print hal-02532209, HAL.
    4. Phipps, Alan G., 2008. "Reuses of closed schools in Windsor, Ontario," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 18-30, March.
    5. Bob van Bronkhorst & Brano Glumac & Tristan Kunen & Michel van Rhee & Wim Schaefer, 2014. "The Dutch Land Market: A Regional Tool for Policy Impact on Vacancy and Grant Rates," ERES eres2014_75, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. Elvia María Jiménez Zapata, 2016. "Participación en la Plusvalía: Instrumento Financiero Ligado al Desarrollo Urbanístico," Revista de Economía y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, December.
    7. Alberto Longo & Danny Campbell, 2017. "The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 261-283, June.
    8. Alexander Woestenburg & Erwin van der Krabben & Tejo Spit, 2019. "Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands," Land, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 8(7), pages 1-1, July.
    9. Puustinen, Tuulia & Pennanen, Kyösti & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "The distribution of perceived advantages and disadvantages of infill development among owners of a commonhold and its’ implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 303-313.
    10. Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Jinming Zhang & Feihu Liu, 2020. "Transformation of Industrial Land in Urban Renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(10), pages 1-1, October.
    11. Ahmad, Naveed & Zhu, Yuming & Hongli, Lin & Karamat, Jawad & Waqas, Muhammad & Taskheer Mumtaz, Syed Muhammad, 2020. "Mapping the obstacles to brownfield redevelopment adoption in developing economies: Pakistani Perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    13. Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2013. "Shovel-Ready? An Empirical Investigation of Stalled Residential Sites," ERES eres2013_259, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:33:y:2001:i:3:p:453-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.