IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i8p1836-1855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-David Gerber

    (Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, 3012 Bern, Switzerland)

  • Adena R Rissman

    (Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison WI 53706, USA)

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations often pursue land acquisition as a nonpolitical, private property rights approach to conservation of ecological and cultural resources. Yet acquisition and regulatory land-use planning are intertwined, both in terms of political strategies and conservation outcomes. Our objectives are (1) to understand the relationship between the acquisition strategies of land trusts and their involvement in land-use planning and zoning, and (2) to examine how the interactions between acquisition and land-use planning may shape conservation outcomes. We focus on the strategies of The Nature Conservancy, one of the largest conservation NGOs in the United States. Drawing from an institutional analysis framework, we compare case studies from Tehama and Monterey Counties, California. Through semistructured interviews, analysis of land-use plans and conservation-easement agreements, and GIS mapping we examine political strategies and conservation outcomes. Our analysis reveals that acquisition strategies and the regulatory context influence each other strongly, but that tensions between the politics of these strategies challenge conservation actors to deploy both effectively. Finally, we develop themes for future research, suggesting that the implementation and assessment of regional conservation efforts would benefit from an integrated strategy that recognizes the synergistic linkages between acquisition and regulatory land-use planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-David Gerber & Adena R Rissman, 2012. "Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1836-1855, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:1836-1855
    DOI: 10.1068/a44395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44395
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick T Hurley & Peter A Walker, 2004. "Whose Vision? Conspiracy Theory and Land-Use Planning in Nevada County, California," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1529-1547, September.
    2. David Adams & Alan Disberry & Norman Hutchison & Thomas Munjoma, 2001. "Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(3), pages 453-477, March.
    3. Martin Nie, 2008. "The underappreciated role of regulatory enforcement in natural resource conservation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(2), pages 139-164, June.
    4. Gerber, Jean-David & Knoepfel, Peter & Nahrath, Stéphane & Varone, Frédéric, 2009. "Institutional Resource Regimes: Towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 798-809, January.
    5. The Food Industry Center, University of Minnesota, 2011. "The Food Industry Center 2010-2011 Annual Report," Annual Reports 259760, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanessa R. Levesque & Aram J. K. Calhoun & Kathleen P. Bell, 2019. "Actions speak louder than words: designing transdisciplinary approaches to enact solutions," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 159-169, June.
    2. Chuan Yang & Mingfeng Li & Ziqi Wang, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Conservation Land Trust and Implication for China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Jean-David Gerber & Stéphane Nahrath & Thomas Hartmann, 2017. "The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1684-1703, July.
    4. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    5. John A. Gallo & Amanda T. Lombard & Richard M. Cowling & Randal Greene & Frank W. Davis, 2023. "Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Sumaryanto & Sri Hery Susilowati & Fitri Nurfatriani & Herlina Tarigan & Erwidodo & Tahlim Sudaryanto & Henri Wira Perkasa, 2022. "Determinants of Farmers’ Behavior towards Land Conservation Practices in the Upper Citarum Watershed in West Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Jiaxin Guo & Zhenqi Hu & Yusheng Liang, 2022. "Causes and Countermeasures for the Failure of Mining Land Use Policy Reform: Practice Analysis from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Daniel S. Silva & Eugenio Y. Arima, 2023. "Sustainability Consequences of Making Land Change Decisions Based on Current Climatology in the Brazilian Cerrados," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Aubin & Frédéric Varone, 2013. "Getting Access to Water: Property Rights or Public Policy Strategies?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 154-167, February.
    2. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    3. Abdelkader, Mahmood & Sliuzas, Richard & Boerboom, Luc & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "The unintended consequences of Egypt's institutional land regime on unplanned settlement growth in the Nile Valley," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Buchs, Arnaud & Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2021. "Challenging the ecological economics of water: Social and political perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Jean-David Gerber, St phane Nahrath, 2013. "Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines Ressourcenansatzes der Nachhaltigkeit," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper03, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    6. Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Vivien, Franck-Dominique, 2017. "Common Patrimony: A Concept to Analyze Collective Natural Resource Management. The Case of Water Management in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 126-132.
    7. Nyuying Wang & Oleg Golubchikov & Wei Chen & Zhigao Liu, 2020. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Post-Industrial Beijing: Communism, Neoliberalism, and Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling & Pau Chung Leng, 2018. "Ten Steps Qualitative Modelling: Development and Validation of Conceptual Institutional-Social-Ecological Model of Public Open Space (POS) Governance and Quality," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Bettina Bahn-Walkowiak & Raimund Bleischwitz & Martin Distelkamp & Mark Meyer, 2012. "Taxing construction minerals: a contribution to a resource-efficient Europe," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 25(1), pages 29-43, July.
    10. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    11. Robert H. W. Boyer & Nicole D. Peterson & Poonam Arora & Kevin Caldwell, 2016. "Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Juliet Katusiime & Brigitta Schütt, 2023. "Towards Legislation Responsive to Integrated Watershed Management Approaches and Land Tenure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    13. Thomas Bolognesi, 2014. "The paradox of the modernisation of urban water systems in Europe: Intrinsic institutional limits for sustainability," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(4), pages 270-281, November.
    14. Primmer, Eeva & Karppinen, Heimo, 2010. "Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: Forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 136-146, February.
    15. Maureen G Reed, 2007. "Uneven Environmental Management: A Canadian Comparative Political Ecology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 320-338, February.
    16. Bullock, Craig H. & Collier, Marcus, 2011. "When the public good conflicts with an apparent preference for unsustainable behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 971-977, March.
    17. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    19. Arnaud Buchs, 2012. "Périodiser les phases de régime et de crise des usages de l'eau. L'apport d'une approche en termes de modes d'usage de l'eau," Post-Print halshs-00716693, HAL.
    20. Anne G Short Gianotti & Timothy P Duane, 2016. "Learning to listen: how collaborative dialogue in regulation influences landowner adoption of best management practices on unregulated lands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(2), pages 320-339, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:1836-1855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.