IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v148y2025ics0264837724003703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The engagement of environmental organizations on land policies: A case study of Pro Natura, Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Cailleux, Lauriane

Abstract

The growing tension around land use issues is pressuring public authorities to regulate land use due to factors such as climate change and biodiversity preservation. Third-party actors, like non-profit organizations, play a significant role in land policies by owning land, monitoring conservation easements, and influencing regulatory decisions through expertise, media campaigns, and legal actions. This article aims to understand the strategies of environmental organizations to engage in land policies in Western European countries. It highlights the various actions these organizations use to impact land planning and regulation, including market-based instruments, political lobbying, and public campaigning. Using a Swiss case study based on document analysis and expert interviews, the study reveals the dual role of environmental organizations, as both allies and competitors of public authorities in achieving their objectives. Consequently, the paper demonstrates that environmental organizations act as crucial intermediaries in the development of land policies. Finally, the article recommends that planners and land-use experts disclose any intermediation relationships or regulatory roles supported by environmental organizations to increase transparency and accountability in land policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cailleux, Lauriane, 2025. "The engagement of environmental organizations on land policies: A case study of Pro Natura, Switzerland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0264837724003703
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724003703
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna M. Hersperger & Maria-Pia Gennaio Franscini & Daniel Kübler, 2014. "Actors, Decisions and Policy Changes in Local Urbanization," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 1301-1319, June.
    2. Jean-David Gerber & Adena R Rissman, 2012. "Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1836-1855, August.
    3. Sasser Erika N. & Prakash Aseem & Cashore Benjamin & Auld Graeme, 2006. "Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Welch, Catherine & Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca & Penttinen, Heli & Tahvanainen, Marja, 2002. "Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 611-628, October.
    5. Poulton, David W. & Kaplinsky, Eran S., 2022. "Unfinished business: Market-based instruments under the Alberta Land Stewardship Act," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Weber, Norbert & Christophersen, Tim, 2002. "The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, May.
    7. P�draig Carmody, 2014. "NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects, by Aziz Choudry & Dip Kapoor," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 462-463, March.
    8. Papamichail, Theodora & Perić, Ana, 2023. "Action-oriented planning methods as a tool for improving regional governance in Switzerland: Evidence from the Sisslerfeld area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Sarah Pilgrim & Mark Harvey, 2010. "Battles over Biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the Politics of Markets," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(3), pages 45-60, August.
    10. Francesca Colli & Johan Adriaensen, 2020. "Lobbying the state or the market? A framework to study civil society organizations’ strategic behavior," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 501-513, July.
    11. Luc Brès & Sébastien Mena & Marie‐Laure Salles‐Djelic, 2019. "Exploring the formal and informal roles of regulatory intermediaries in transnational multistakeholder regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 127-140, June.
    12. William Fischel, 2005. "Politics In A Dynamic View Of Land-Use Regulations: Of Interest Groups And Homevoters," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 397-403, December.
    13. Jo Marie Rios, 2000. "ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE GROUPS: Grass‐roots Movement or NGO Networks? Some Policy Implications," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 17(2‐3), pages 179-211, June.
    14. Rissman, Adena R. & Morris, Amy W. & Kalinin, Alexey & Kohl, Patrice A. & Parker, Dominic P. & Selles, Owen, 2019. "Private organizations, public data: Land trust choices about mapping conservation easements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Benjamin Cooke & Lilian M. Pearce & Aidan Davison, 2024. "Environmental NGOs and Protected Area Conservation in Australia: The Political Consequences of Aligning with Private Interests," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(2), pages 334-351, February.
    16. Pralle, Sarah B., 2003. "Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 233-260, September.
    17. Calado, Helena & Bentz, Julia & Ng, Kiat & Zivian, Anna & Schaefer, Nicole & Pringle, Colin & Johnson, David & Phillips, Mike, 2012. "NGO involvement in marine spatial planning: A way forward?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 382-388.
    18. Sasser, Erika N. & Prakash, Aseem & Cashore, Benjamin & Auld, Graeme, 2006. "Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Stephanie Pincetl, 2003. "Nonprofits and Park Provision in Los Angeles: An Exploration of the Rise of Governance Approaches to the Provision of Local Services," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(4), pages 979-1001, December.
    20. Roitman, Iris & Cardoso Galli Vieira, Ludgero & Baiocchi Jacobson, Tamiel Khan & da Cunha Bustamante, Mercedes Maria & Silva Marcondes, Nívea Jorgia & Cury, Kátia & Silva Estevam, Luciana & da Costa R, 2018. "Rural Environmental Registry: An innovative model for land-use and environmental policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 95-102.
    21. Cottle, Morgan A. & Howard, Theodore E., 2012. "Conflict management and community support for conservation in the Northern Forest: Case studies from Maine," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 66-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabra-Crespo, M. & Rojas-Briales, E., 2015. "Comparative analysis on the communication strategies of the forest owners' associations in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 20-30.
    2. Kadam, Parag & Dwivedi, Puneet & Karnatz, Caroline, 2021. "Mapping convergence of sustainable forest management systems: Comparing three protocols and two certification schemes for ascertaining the trends in global forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Carolyn Fischer & Thomas P. Lyon, 2014. "Competing Environmental Labels," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 692-716, September.
    4. Baron, David P., 2011. "Credence attributes, voluntary organizations, and social pressure," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1331-1338.
    5. Erin Leitheiser, 2021. "How domestic contexts shape international private governance: The case of the European Accord and American Alliance in Bangladesh," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1286-1303, October.
    6. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    7. Juerges, Nataly & Newig, Jens, 2015. "How interest groups adapt to the changing forest governance landscape in the EU: A case study from Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 228-235.
    8. Bösch, Matthias, 2025. "What explains the uneven uptake of forest certification at the global level? New evidence from a panel-data analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Erica Johnson & Aseem Prakash, 2007. "NGO research program: a collective action perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 40(3), pages 221-240, September.
    10. Erin M. Reid & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(11), pages 1157-1178, November.
    11. Erin M. Reid & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(11), pages 1157-1178, November.
    12. Guillaume Lescuyer & Raphaël Tsanga & Samir Nziengui & Eric Forni & Claudia Romero, 2021. "Influence of FSC certification on the governance of the logging sector in the Congo basin," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(3), pages 289-304, August.
    13. Sotirov, Metodi & Memmler, Michael, 2012. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies — Recent experiences and further prospects," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 51-64.
    14. Aija Rusina, 2020. "Name and shame? Evidence from the European Union tax haven blacklist," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(6), pages 1364-1424, December.
    15. Graeme Auld, 2014. "Confronting trade‐offs and interactive effects in the choice of policy focus: Specialized versus comprehensive private governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 126-148, March.
    16. Heidingsfelder, Jens, 2019. "Private sustainability governance in the making – A case study analysis of the fragmentation of sustainability governance for the gold sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Godar, Javier & Persson, U. Martin & Tizado, E. Jorge & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2015. "Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: Tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 25-35.
    18. Steven Bernstein & Benjamin Cashore, 2007. "Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 347-371, December.
    19. Chris F. Wright, 2016. "Leveraging Reputational Risk: Sustainable Sourcing Campaigns for Improving Labour Standards in Production Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 195-210, August.
    20. John S. Ahlquist & Layna Mosley, 2021. "Firm participation in voluntary regulatory initiatives: The Accord, Alliance, and US garment importers from Bangladesh," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 317-343, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0264837724003703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.