IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1819-d1743834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Construction of Applicable Models for Temporary Land Use in Open-Pit Coal Mining and Implementation Models for Land Reclamation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxin Guo

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Jian Lin

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Zhenqi Hu

    (School of Environment Science & Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Pengfei An

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Junfeng Yin

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yifan Du

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Peian Wang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

China’s traditional approach to supplying land for mining operations hinders the sustainable use of land resources, resulting in extensive land degradation and idleness after mining activities conclude. Based on this, the competent national authorities have innovatively launched reforms to the temporary land supply model for open-pit coal mining operations. This study uses the Anjialing open-pit coal mine pilot project in Shanxi Province, China as a case example to construct a comprehensive lifecycle model for temporary mining land use in operational coal mines. It evaluates the land reclamation implementation at this mine and proposes a land management model for future pilot mines establishing new temporary mining sites. Research indicates that: (1) In pilot mining projects currently under construction, the larger the initial mining area, the lower the strip ratio and coal extraction rate, and the longer the overall duration of temporary land use. (2) Based on the overall land use cycle model for temporary mining sites, the land use cycle for the Anjialing open-pit coal mine is approximately 7 to 10 years, making it impossible to complete mining operations and return the land after reclamation within five years. (3) Based on historical image analysis using the GEE platform, by the end of 2020, the coal mine reclamation area barely reached the boundaries of the 2012 temporary land use plan. Consequently, the pilot project for temporary mining land use failed to pass the required acceptance inspection. Overall, the promotion of this new model not only upholds the critical mission of safeguarding national farmland and ensuring food security, but also holds significant implications for future resource extraction and sustainable land utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxin Guo & Jian Lin & Zhenqi Hu & Pengfei An & Junfeng Yin & Yifan Du & Peian Wang, 2025. "Research on the Construction of Applicable Models for Temporary Land Use in Open-Pit Coal Mining and Implementation Models for Land Reclamation in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1819-:d:1743834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hendrychová, Markéta & Svobodova, Kamila & Kabrna, Martin, 2020. "Mine reclamation planning and management: Integrating natural habitats into post-mining land use," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Vesna Popović & Jelena Živanović Miljković & Jonel Subić & Andrei Jean-Vasile & Nedelcu Adrian & Eugen Nicolăescu, 2015. "Sustainable Land Management in Mining Areas in Serbia and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Jiaxin Guo & Zhenqi Hu & Yusheng Liang, 2022. "Causes and Countermeasures for the Failure of Mining Land Use Policy Reform: Practice Analysis from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jean-David Gerber & Adena R Rissman, 2012. "Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1836-1855, August.
    5. Peichao Dai & Ruxu Sheng & Zhongzhen Miao & Zanxu Chen & Yuan Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Industrial Land Supply Scale in Relation to Industrial Structure in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Anthony Bebbington & Leonith Hinojosa & Denise Humphreys Bebbington & Maria Luisa Burneo & Ximena Warnaars, 2008. "Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 5708, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    7. Shicheng Li & Shan Su & Yanxia Liu & Xuewu Zhou & Quanxin Luo & Basanta Paudel, 2022. "Effectiveness of the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve of China in Reducing Human Impacts," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Yao Luo & Chen Li & Junjun Zhi & Qun Wu & Jiajing Yao, 2022. "Policy Innovation of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land Supply in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Zhenqi Hu & Linghua Duo & Fang Shao, 2018. "Optimal Thickness of Soil Cover for Reclaiming Subsided Land with Yellow River Sediments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    10. Sullivan, Jay & Amacher, Gregory S., 2013. "Optimal hardwood tree planting and forest reclamation policy on reclaimed surface mine lands in the Appalachian coal region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaxin Guo & Zhenqi Hu & Yusheng Liang, 2022. "Causes and Countermeasures for the Failure of Mining Land Use Policy Reform: Practice Analysis from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2025. "Rehabilitation costs paid by mining enterprises in Turkey: Comparison of rehabilitation costs with their shares in mining operation costs and other environmental costs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Cem Iskender Aydin & Begum Ozkaynak & Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos & Taylan Yenilmez, 2017. "Network effects in environmental justice struggles: An investigation of conflicts between mining companies and civil society organizations from a network perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Damonte, Gerardo, 2021. "Limited state governance and institutional hybridization in alluvial ASM in Peru," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    6. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    8. Karolien van Teijlingen & Barbara Hogenboom, 2016. "Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 382-420, December.
    9. Elbra, Ainsley, 2024. "Arc of avoidance: An analytical framework for analysing mining companies’ actions in the global South," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    11. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Congguo Zhang & Di Yao & Yanlin Zhen & Weiwei Li & Kerun Li, 2022. "Mismatched Relationship between Urban Industrial Land Consumption and Growth of Manufacturing: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-35, August.
    13. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    14. Oluwaseye Samson Adedoja & Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku & Yskandar Hamam, 2025. "Multicriteria Decision-Making for Sustainable Mining: Evaluating the Transition to Net-Zero-Carbon Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-32, May.
    15. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    16. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Patrick Ten Brink & Leonardo Mazza & Alison Ratliff & Emma Watkins, 2016. "Evidence of Absolute Decoupling from Real World Policy Mixes in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, May.
    17. da Silva Junior, Carlos Antonio & Coutinho, Andressa Dias & de Oliveira-Júnior, José Francisco & Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo & Lima, Mendelson & Shakir, Muhammad & de Gois, Givanildo & Johann, Jerry Adrian, 2018. "Analysis of the impact on vegetation caused by abrupt deforestation via orbital sensor in the environmental disaster of Mariana, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-20.
    18. Miles Kenney-Lazar & SiuSue Mark, 2021. "Variegated transitions: Emerging forms of land and resource capitalism in Laos and Myanmar," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 296-314, March.
    19. Orihuela, José Carlos & Mendieta, Arturo & Pérez, Carlos & Ramírez, Tania, 2021. "From paper institutions to bureaucratic autonomy: Institutional change as a resource curse remedy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Sumaryanto & Sri Hery Susilowati & Fitri Nurfatriani & Herlina Tarigan & Erwidodo & Tahlim Sudaryanto & Henri Wira Perkasa, 2022. "Determinants of Farmers’ Behavior towards Land Conservation Practices in the Upper Citarum Watershed in West Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1819-:d:1743834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.