IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v123y2022ics026483772200432x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Puustinen, Tuulia
  • Krigsholm, Pauliina
  • Falkenbach, Heidi

Abstract

Densification is being promoted in urban areas globally because of its many economic, environmental, and social benefits. The concept itself remains ambiguous, however, which is hampering the pursuit of densification as a strategic land policy objective. In this paper we construct literature-based land policy conflict profiles for different types of densification in order to reach a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in promoting densification through land policy. To that end we use a hermeneutic approach to critically review the literature and develop a typology of different densification types with relevance to land policy and categorize land policy conflicts specific to each type. As a result, we distinguish four densification-type-specific land policy conflict profiles: 1) policy-driven large-scale brownfield development, 2) policy-driven large-scale densification of strategic areas, 3) owner-driven medium-scale densification of individual high-rise sites, and 4) owner-driven incremental-scale densification of low-rise sites. The land policy conflict profiles address factors hindering the efficiency and effectiveness of the policy, the allocative, distributive, and procedural justice of densification, and conflicting policy outcomes. These unique conflict profiles allow for a detailed recognition of gaps, weaknesses, contradictions, justice and/or political indecisiveness in land policies promoting densification. The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by land policy aimed at promoting densification. In addition, the conflict profiles will be helpful for practitioners in drafting municipal densification strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:123:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200432x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772200432X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Adams & Alan Disberry & Norman Hutchison & Thomas Munjoma, 2001. "Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(3), pages 453-477, March.
    2. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Gallagher, Rachel & Liu, Yan & Sigler, Thomas, 2019. "Parcel amalgamation as a mechanism for achieving urban consolidation through densification: The fixity of property boundaries over time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Peter Bibby & John Henneberry & Jean-Marie Halleux, 2021. "Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2117-2138, August.
    5. Idt, Joel & Pellegrino, Margot, 2021. "From the ostensible objectives of public policies to the reality of changes: Local orders of densification in the urban regions of Paris and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Matthias Cinyabuguma & Virginia McConnell, 2013. "Urban Growth Externalities And Neighborhood Incentives: Another Cause Of Urban Sprawl?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 332-348, May.
    7. Götze, Vera & Hartmann, Thomas, 2021. "Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Jeffrey Biggar, 2021. "Approaching Negotiations in Urban Redevelopment Projects: A Multiple Case Analysis of Stakeholder Involvement in Community Benefit Agreements," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 725-746, October.
    10. Jean-David Gerber, 2016. "The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 192-209, April.
    11. John D. Landis & Heather Hood & Guangyu Li & Thomas Rogers & Charles Warren, 2006. "The future of infill housing in California: Opportunities, potential, and feasibility," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 681-725, January.
    12. Alice Christudason, 2010. "Legal framework for collective sale of real estate in Singapore," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 109-122, March.
    13. Ilan Wiesel & Robert Freestone & Bill Randolph, 2013. "Owner-Driven Suburban Renewal: Motivations, Risks and Strategies in 'Knockdown and Rebuild' Processes in Sydney, Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 701-719, July.
    14. Julian Bolleter & Zoe Myers & Paula Hooper, 2021. "Delivering medium-density infill development through promoting the benefits and limiting background infill," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 441-466, July.
    15. Eero Valtonen & Heidi Falkenbach & Kauko Viitanen, 2017. "Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1053-1075, June.
    16. Hazel Easthope & Sarah Hudson & Bill Randolph, 2013. "Urban Renewal and Strata Scheme Termination: Balancing Communal Management and Individual Property Rights," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1421-1435, June.
    17. Tuna Tasan-Kok & Martijn van den Hurk & Sara Özogul & Sofia Bittencourt, 2019. "Changing public accountability mechanisms in the governance of Dutch urban regeneration," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 1107-1128, June.
    18. Anastasia Touati-Morel, 2015. "Hard and Soft Densification Policies in the Paris City-Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 603-612, May.
    19. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Herkes, Feie J. & Zouridis, Stavros, 2023. "The legitimacy of land use decisions by public authorities in the Netherlands: Results from a survey experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Stephen Glackin & Magnus Moglia & Marcus White, 2024. "Suburban Futures, Density and Amenity: Soft Densification and Incremental Planning for Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Adekola, Oluwafemi & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Riekkinen, Kirsikka, 2023. "Adapted institutional analysis and development framework for understanding customary land institutions in sub-Saharan Africa – A case study from Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Magazzino, Cosimo & Valente, Donatella & Mirzaei, Abbas & Petrosillo, Irene, 2023. "A new interval meta-goal programming for sustainable planning of agricultural water-land use nexus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vera Götze & Mathias Jehling, 2023. "Comparing types and patterns: A context-oriented approach to densification in Switzerland and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1645-1659, July.
    2. Debrunner, Gabriela & Kaufmann, David, 2023. "Land valuation in densifying cities: The negotiation process between institutional landowners and municipal planning authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Bouwmeester, Josje & Gerber, Jean-David & Hartmann, Thomas & Ay, Deniz, 2023. "Non-compliance and non-enforcement: An unexpected outcome of flexible soft densification policy in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. McFarlane, Nick & Hurley, Joe & Sun, Qian (Chayn), 2023. "Private-led land assembly and urban consolidation: The relative influence of regulatory zoning mechanisms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    8. Peter Bibby & John Henneberry & Jean-Marie Halleux, 2021. "Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2117-2138, August.
    9. Puustinen, Tuulia & Pennanen, Kyösti & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "The distribution of perceived advantages and disadvantages of infill development among owners of a commonhold and its’ implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 303-313.
    10. Vafa Dianati, 2021. "The Interplay between Urban Densification and Place Change in Tehran; Implications for Place-Based Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Cavicchia, Rebecca, 2023. "Housing accessibility in densifying cities: Entangled housing and land use policy limitations and insights from Oslo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Suzanne Lanyi Charles, 2014. "The spatio-temporal pattern of housing redevelopment in suburban Chicago, 2000–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2646-2664, September.
    13. Melissa Candel, 2021. "Using Sustainability-Oriented Developer Obligations and Public Land Development to Create Public Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Phang, Sock-Yong & Helble, Matthias, 2016. "Housing Policies in Singapore," ADBI Working Papers 559, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    15. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.
    16. Wendong Zhang & Douglas H. Wrenn & Elena G. Irwin, 2017. "Spatial Heterogeneity, Accessibility, and Zoning: An Empirical Investigation of Leapfrog Development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 547-570.
    17. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Le Bivic, Camille & Melot, Romain, 2020. "Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    20. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2023. "The Urban Renewal Matrix," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:123:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200432x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.