IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v45y2013i6p1421-1435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Renewal and Strata Scheme Termination: Balancing Communal Management and Individual Property Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Hazel Easthope
  • Sarah Hudson
  • Bill Randolph

Abstract

A debate is taking place in Australia regarding potential changes to the legislation governing what proportion of owners must agree before apartment buildings can be redeveloped and whether a collective sale model should be adopted in order to facilitate urban renewal. To date, urban renewal has proven challenging because of difficulties of coordinating renewal within a planning system that relies on the market to deliver housing. This challenge is amplified by the governance framework created to promote multiunit housing—strata title—and associated tensions between communal management and individual property rights. This paper makes particular reference to the implications of this debate in the greater Sydney metropolitan area, which raises universal issues regarding tensions between the government and the market and between individual rights and the collective good. This paper argues that there is a case for changing the legislation, with government involvement required to respond to the significant social issues raised, to guarantee the needs of existing owners and tenants are met, and to ensure that high-quality, economically viable, buildings result.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazel Easthope & Sarah Hudson & Bill Randolph, 2013. "Urban Renewal and Strata Scheme Termination: Balancing Communal Management and Individual Property Rights," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1421-1435, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:6:p:1421-1435
    DOI: 10.1068/a4598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4598
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a4598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dianne Dredge & Eddo Coiacetto, 2011. "Strata Title: Towards a Research Agenda for Informed Planning Practice," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 417-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingyan Li & Jiaxin Zhu & Mimi Duan & Pingbo Li & Xiaotong Guo, 2022. "Overcoming the Collaboration Barriers among Stakeholders in Urban Renewal Based on a Two-Mode Social Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Puustinen, Tuulia & Pennanen, Kyösti & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "The distribution of perceived advantages and disadvantages of infill development among owners of a commonhold and its’ implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 303-313.
    3. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Jihye & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2022. "A BIM-based framework for property dispute minimization – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Brian Webb & James T. White, 2022. "Planning and the High-Rise Neighbourhood: Debates on Vertical Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 208-212.
    3. Roberts, M.B. & Bruce, A. & MacGill, I., 2019. "Opportunities and barriers for photovoltaics on multi-unit residential buildings: Reviewing the Australian experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 95-110.
    4. Mark Holton & Clare M. Mouat, 2021. "The rise (and rise) of vertical studentification: Exploring the drivers of studentification in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1866-1884, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:6:p:1421-1435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.