IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i6p1053-1075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Eero Valtonen
  • Heidi Falkenbach
  • Kauko Viitanen

Abstract

Planning systems are generally divided into plan-led and development-led systems. However, it is quite common that the planning practice follows development-led planning although the planning system would structurally be plan-led. To study how development-led planning affects the implementation of large-scale urban development projects, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in Finland – a country with a hierarchical setting of legally binding zoning plans which can be prepared by following either plan-led or development-led practices. The survey respondents were civil servants managing implementation of large-scale urban development projects. Our results quite surprisingly suggest that development-led planning may cause the projects to become more vulnerable to property market uncertainty compared to the projects following the plan-led practises. These results challenge the usual output-based legitimation of development-led planning to some extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Eero Valtonen & Heidi Falkenbach & Kauko Viitanen, 2017. "Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1053-1075, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:6:p:1053-1075
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart M. Farthing, 2001. "Local Land Use Plans and the Implementation of New Urban Development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 223-242, March.
    2. Anne Haila, 2008. "From Annankatu to Antinkatu: Contracts, Development Rights and Partnerships in Kamppi, Helsinki," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 804-814, December.
    3. Geraint Ellis, 2004. "Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-Party Rights in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1549-1570, September.
    4. Heather Campbell & John Henneberry, 2005. "Planning obligations, the market orientation of planning and planning professionalism," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 37-59, September.
    5. P Healey, 1996. "The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 23(2), pages 217-234, April.
    6. Andreas Faludi, 1983. "Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 265-278, August.
    7. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2011. "Plan-Led Planning Systems in Development-Led Practices: An Empirical Analysis into the (Lack of) Institutionalisation of Planning Law," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(4), pages 928-941, April.
    8. Gro S Hanssen, 2010. "Ensuring Local Community Interests in Market-Oriented Urban Planning? The Role of Local Politicians," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(4), pages 714-732, August.
    9. Barrie Needham, 1992. "A Theory of Land Prices when Land is Supplied Publicly: The Case of the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 669-686, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hengstermann, Andreas & Götze, Vera, 2023. "Planning-related land value changes for explaining instruments of compensation and value capture in Switzerland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Liu, Wen & Beattie, Lee & Haarhoff, Errol, 2021. "Outcome-focused plan discretion for facilitating residential intensification: Exploring the insights and experience of property developers and planners," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Zhang, Shouguo & Zhang, Jianjun & Sha, Anmeng & Zhang, Yaping & Zhang, Di, 2023. "How to recognize the role of policy clusters in built-up land intensity: An empirical case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    5. Oliveira, Eduardo & Hersperger, Anna M., 2018. "Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 623-633.
    6. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    2. Nurit Alfasi & Talia Margalit, 2014. "The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 13, pages 269-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Quilling, Eike & Köckler, Heike, 2018. "Partizipation für eine gesundheitsfördernde Stadtentwicklung," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Baumgart, Sabine & Köckler, Heike & Ritzinger, Anne & Rüdiger, Andrea (ed.), Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte, volume 8, pages 101-117, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    5. Shlomit Flint Ashery & Carl Steinitz, 2022. "Issue-Based Complexity: Digitally Supported Negotiation in Geodesign Linking Planning and Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Li, Bingqing & Wang, Zhanqi & Chai, Ji & Zhang, Di, 2019. "Index system to assess implementation of strategic land use plans in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Purcell, Thomas & Ward, Callum, 2022. "The political economy of land value capture in the UK: rent and viability in Salford’s new municipalist turn," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116664, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jones, Christopher R. & Eiser, J. Richard, 2009. "Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4604-4614, November.
    9. Krekeler, Martin & Zimmermann, Thomas, 2014. "Politikwissenschaftliche Forschungsheuristiken als Hilfsmittel bei der Evaluation von raumbedeutsamen Instrumenten," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Küpper, Patrick & Levin-Keitel, Meike & Maus, Friederike & Müller, Peter & Reimann, Sara & Sonderman (ed.), Raumentwicklung 3.0 - Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten, volume 8, pages 74-90, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. ., 2014. "Planning for a housing crisis: or the alchemy by which we turn houses into gold," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 4, pages 79-103, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Fernando Nogueira & Monique Borges & Jan-Hendrik Wolf, 2017. "Collaborative Decision-Making in Non-formal Planning Settings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 875-890, September.
    13. ., 2014. "Planning: reforms that might work and ones that won't," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 6, pages 127-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Lowry, Michael B., 2010. "Using optimization to program projects in the era of communicative rationality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 94-101, March.
    15. M.G. Lloyd, 2008. "Towards a ‘Pooled Sovereignty‘ in Community Planning in Scotland?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 58-68, February.
    16. Julie Pollard, 2023. "The political conditions of the rise of real-estate developers in French housing policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 274-291, March.
    17. Rafaelle Bertini & Abdallah Zouache, 2021. "Agricultural Land Issues in the Middle East and North Africa," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 549-583, March.
    18. Stephen Willey, 2007. "Planning Appeal Processes: Reflections on a Comparative Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1676-1698, July.
    19. Zhang, Xiang & Xu, Jian-gang & Ju, Yang, 2018. "Public participation in NIMBY risk mitigation: A discourse zoning approach in the Chinese context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 559-575.
    20. Atkinson-Palombo, Carol & Kuby, Michael J., 2011. "The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 189-199.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:6:p:1053-1075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.