IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v23y2008i1p58-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a ‘Pooled Sovereignty‘ in Community Planning in Scotland?

Author

Listed:
  • M.G. Lloyd

    (Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, UK)

Abstract

Integrated working in the public sector to achieve greater efficiencies and effectiveness in policy implementation is now a clear political objective. In practice integration of policy and institutional action requires vertical and horizontal synergies to realise its full potential. The question then arises as to how to secure these ambitions. Drawing on the experience of community planning in Scotland the paper explores the case for adopting a more formal and contractualised approach to integrated working based on devising operational agreements within the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • M.G. Lloyd, 2008. "Towards a ‘Pooled Sovereignty‘ in Community Planning in Scotland?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 58-68, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:23:y:2008:i:1:p:58-68
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940801906684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940801906684
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940801906684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucio Baccaro, 2003. "What is Alive and What is Dead in the Theory of Corporatism," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(4), pages 683-706, December.
    2. Kohei Daido, 2006. "Incentive Effects of Peer Pressure in Organizations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(14), pages 1-10.
    3. Kohei Daido, 2006. "Peer Pressure and Incentives," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 51-60, January.
    4. Heather Campbell & John Henneberry, 2005. "Planning obligations, the market orientation of planning and planning professionalism," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 37-59, September.
    5. Gabi Dei Ottati, 2002. "Social Concertation and Local Development: The Case of Industrial Districts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 449-466, June.
    6. Vincent-Jones, Peter, 2006. "The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199291274, Decembrie.
    7. Michael Oxley, 2006. "The Gain from the Planning--Gain Supplement: A Consideration of the Proposal for a New Tax to Boost Housing Supply in the UK," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 101-113, April.
    8. Angelo Pichierri, 2002. "Concertation and local development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 689-706, December.
    9. Svante Mandell, 2003. "Local property taxes and moral hazard," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 157-172, January.
    10. Philip Cooke & Nick Clifton, 2005. "Visionary, precautionary and constrained 'varieties of devolution' in the economic governance of the devolved UK territories," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 437-451.
    11. Michael Keating, 2005. "Policy convergence and divergence in Scotland under devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 453-463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Woestenburg & Erwin van der Krabben & Tejo Spit, 2019. "Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Attilio Pasetto, 2011. "Social Enterprises and Local Production Systems," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, September.
    3. Carlo J Morelli & Paul T. Seaman, 2010. "Devolution as a Policy Crucible: The Case of Universal Free School Meals," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 139-161, January.
    4. Morelli, Carlo & Seaman, Paul, 2009. "Devolution & Entrenched Household Poverty: Is Scotland less mobile?," SIRE Discussion Papers 2009-06, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    5. María José Ruiz-Ortega & Gloria Parra-Requena & Pedro Manuel García-Villaverde, 2016. "Do Territorial Agglomerations Still Provide Competitive Advantages? A Study of Social Capital, Innovation, and Knowledge," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(3), pages 259-290, July.
    6. Ariel Mendez & Delphine Mercier, 2007. "Territorial Dynamics and History Imprint : Two french Clusters in Transition in the South East Region," Working Papers halshs-00360764, HAL.
    7. Sara Belisari & Daniele Binci & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Guy Mundlak, 2009. "Addressing the Legitimacy Gap in the Israeli Corporatist Revival," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 765-787, December.
    9. Pike, Andy & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Torrisi, Gianpiero & Tselios, Vassilis & Tomaney, John, 2010. "In search of the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution: spatial disparities, spatial economic policy and decentralisation in the UK," DEMQ Working Paper Series 2010/9, University of Catania, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    10. Demetrio, Muñoz Gielen & Francisco, Blanc Clavero & Burcher, James Corbet & Juan Felipe, Pinilla, 2023. "The role of jurisprudence in public value capture in urban development: A comparative analysis from Dutch, English, Spanish and Colombian courts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. repec:ilo:ilowps:467072 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jason Coupet & Abagail McWilliams, 2017. "Integrating Organizational Economics and Resource Dependence Theory to Explain the Persistence of Quasi Markets," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Giulio Cainelli & Donato Iacobucci & Enrica Morganti, 2006. "Spatial agglomeration and business groups: New evidence from Italian industrial districts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 507-518.
    14. Jimmy Donaghey, 2008. "Deliberation, Employment Relations and Social Partnership in the Republic of Ireland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, February.
    15. Dong-One Kim & Ji-Young Ahn, 2018. "From Authoritarianism to Democratic Corporatism? The Rise and Decline of Social Dialogue in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Simon Sturn, 2011. "Labour market regimes and unemployment in OECD countries," IMK Working Paper 6-2011, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    17. Shlomit Flint Ashery & Carl Steinitz, 2022. "Issue-Based Complexity: Digitally Supported Negotiation in Geodesign Linking Planning and Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Niamh Hardiman, 2006. "Politics and Social Partnership - Flexible Network Governance," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 37(3), pages 343-374.
    19. Milan Žák & Petr Vymětal, 2006. "Institucionální aspekty nové komparativní ekonomie: ČR a EU [Institutional aspects of new comparative economy: Czech republic and European union]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(5), pages 583-609.
    20. Andy Inch, 2018. "‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1076-1092, April.
    21. Peter Matthews, 2013. "The return of place in Scottish social policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(1), pages 9-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:23:y:2008:i:1:p:58-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.