IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2014_75.html

The Dutch Land Market: A Regional Tool for Policy Impact on Vacancy and Grant Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Bob van Bronkhorst
  • Brano Glumac
  • Tristan Kunen
  • Michel van Rhee
  • Wim Schaefer

Abstract

Purpose – The land market in the Netherlands uses a model in which the municipalities are the land use policy makers, but also act as active stakeholder in the development, and so grant land for profits. The acquisition and granting of this type of land has been very lucrative, this enticed the municipalities to become the largest land owner in the Dutch land market. Municipalities started to act speculatively and rely on these extra incomes. Now, that demand is not evolving as expected, it becomes apparent that even after the crisis there will be a large oversupply. To ensure incomes on business land, municipalities are searching for methods to increase demand. There is large inter-municipal competition for attracting new, but mostly relocating, firms. It is therefore important to examine the effects of policy deployment on the total business property stock, to prevent excessive vacancy in the current stock.Design/methodology/approach – For this paper demand and supply are extruded into two dimensions, quantitative and qualitative. The qualitative aspects are identified with location theory representing the demand on the micro-scale. These aspects influence the companies’ preferences for a location that again vary over different industry sectors. Further, these preferences were quantified with a ‘Bayesian classifier network’ in combination with ‘random utility theory’. On the macro scale, the demand is quantified by using the employment indicators for a certain industry sector. On the other hand, supply is simply represented with the existing business parks stock. Demand and supply are then combined in an agent based model in which simulated companies make microeconomic decisions based on previously determined variables. To verify and indicate the applicability of the developed approach, a real case study was conducted for the conurbation of Eindhoven in the province of Noord Brabant in the Netherlands.Findings – The model approximates the demand and vacancy of the municipal land supply and investigates the applicability of certain land use intervention policies. The developed model is supplied with an interface which allows decision makers to use it as a decision support tool.Originality/value – As previous research has identified the quantitative demand on the macro scale, this research incorporates also ‘qualitative aspects’ such as the location and allocation. These aspects reflect the micro scale supply and demand of business land.

Suggested Citation

  • Bob van Bronkhorst & Brano Glumac & Tristan Kunen & Michel van Rhee & Wim Schaefer, 2014. "The Dutch Land Market: A Regional Tool for Policy Impact on Vacancy and Grant Rates," ERES eres2014_75, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2014-75
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2014_75.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouke van Dijk & Piet H. Pellenbarg, 2000. "Firm relocation decisions in The Netherlands: An ordered logit approach," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 79(2), pages 191-219.
    2. Filipe Batista e Silva & Eric Koomen & Vasco Diogo & Carlo Lavalle, 2014. "Estimating Demand for Industrial and Commercial Land Use Given Economic Forecasts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Huub Ploegmakers & Erwin van der Krabben & Edwin Buitelaar, 2013. "Understanding industrial land supply: how Dutch municipalities make decisions about supplying serviced building land," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 324-344, December.
    5. David Adams & Alan Disberry & Norman Hutchison & Thomas Munjoma, 2001. "Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(3), pages 453-477, March.
    6. Pellenbarg, P.H. & Wissen, L.J.G. van & Dijk, J. van, 2002. "Firm relocation: state of the art and research prospects," Research Report 02D31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngsoo An & Li Wan, 2019. "Monitoring Spatial Changes in Manufacturing Firms in Seoul Metropolitan Area Using Firm Life Cycle and Locational Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod & Miguel Manjón-Antolín & Óscar Martínez, 2015. "The Relocation of R&D Establishments in France: An Empirical Analysis," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 33, pages 97-119.
    3. Hanna Maoh & Pavlos Kanaroglou, 2007. "Business establishment mobility behavior in urban areas: a microanalytical model for the City of Hamilton in Ontario, Canada," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 229-252, September.
    4. Federica Rossi & Magdalena Dej, 2020. "Where do firms relocate? Location optimisation within and between Polish metropolitan areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 615-640, June.
    5. Miguel Manjón-Antolín & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2011. "Locations and relocations: determinants, modelling, and interrelations," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(1), pages 131-146, August.
    6. Tessa Conroy & Steven Deller & Alexandra Tsvetkova, 2017. "Interstate Relocation Of Manufacturers And Business Climate," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 18-45, March.
    7. Sung Hyo Hong, 2014. "Agglomeration and relocation: Manufacturing plant relocation in Korea," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 803-818, November.
    8. Manuel Artis & Raul Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2006. "Job losses, outsourcing and relocation, empirical evidence using microdata," IREA Working Papers 200601, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2006.
    9. Balbontin, Camila & Hensher, David A., 2021. "Understanding business location decision making for transport planning: An investigation of the role of process rules in identifying influences on firm location," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Conroy, Tessa & Deller, Steven & Tsvetkova, Alexandra, 2016. "Regional business climate and interstate manufacturing relocation decisions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 155-168.
    11. Jung Hun Yang & Dick Ettema & Koen Frenken & Frank van Oort & Evert-Jan Visser, 2011. "A geosimulation model of economic activity for supporting spatial planning and economic policy," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1016, European Regional Science Association.
    12. repec:rre:publsh:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:67-88 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Kristin Kronenberg, 2013. "Firm relocations in the Netherlands: Why do firms move, and where do they go?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 691-713, November.
    14. Antonin BERGEAUD & Simon RAY, 2018. "Adjustment costs and factor demand: some lessons from corporate real estate," Rue de la Banque, Banque de France, issue 64, June.
    15. David Adams & Christopher De Sousa & Steven Tiesdell, 2010. "Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 75-104, January.
    16. Kristjan Liivamägi, 2015. "Investor Education and Portfolio Diversification on the Stock Market," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 7(1).
    17. Pascal Beckers & Bart Sleutjes, 2014. "Neighbourhood Spatial Order, the Local Economy and Firm Mobility in Urban Areas of the Netherlands," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2103-2122, November.
    18. Jean-David Gerber & Stéphane Nahrath & Patrick Csikos & Peter Knoepfel, 2011. "The Role of Swiss Civic Corporations in Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 185-204, January.
    19. Jean-David Gerber & Stéphane Nahrath & Thomas Hartmann, 2017. "The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1684-1703, July.
    20. Jehling, Mathias & Krehl, Angelika & Krüger, Tobias, 2021. "The more the merrier? Questioning the role of new commercial and industrial locations for employment growth in German city regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    21. Gallagher, Rachel & Liu, Yan & Sigler, Thomas, 2019. "Parcel amalgamation as a mechanism for achieving urban consolidation through densification: The fixity of property boundaries over time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.