IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v8y2019i3p83-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Servisscape in the Finest Cinema: Is It Works for Young Customers?

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Pandowo

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Manado Indonesia)

  • Merinda H. C. Pandowo

    (Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia)

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the consequences of servicescape and to explore the application of it in the premium cinema. Several stimuli related to cinemas’ physical attraction are added to determine their relation such as ambiances, spatial layouts, and signs. 154 visitors are taken by purposive sampling. The respondents are the young regular audience in the finest cinema. Closed structure questioners are spread for primary data and examined with path analysis. The results show that servicescape is related to perceived quality, perceived value, and willingness to pay a premium. Meanwhile, a significant relation also is shown between perceived quality and perceived value. There is also evidence that both perceived quality and perceived value as antecedents of willingness to pay the premium price. The findings provide the applicability of servicescape in the cinema industry, especially in high-class cinema where the consumer-brand relationship is needed Key Words:Servicescape, Perceived Quality, Perceived Value, Premium Price, Hedonic Behaviour

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Pandowo & Merinda H. C. Pandowo, 2019. "Servisscape in the Finest Cinema: Is It Works for Young Customers?," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(3), pages 83-93, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:83-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/257/249
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/257
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippa Ward & Barry Davies & Dion Kooijman, 2007. "Olfaction and the retail environment: examining the influence of ambient scent," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 1(4), pages 295-316, December.
    2. Franziska Voelckner, 2006. "An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 137-149, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayer, Stefan & Klein, Robert & Seiermann, Stephanie, 2013. "A simulation-based approach to price optimisation of the mixed bundling problem with capacity constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 584-598.
    2. Kirsten, Johann F. & Vermeulen, Hester & Van Zyl, Karlien & Du Randt, Gerrie & Du Plessis, H. & Weissnar, Tessa, 2012. "The economic potential for an origin based marketing and certification system for a meat product in South Africa: Perceptions, preferences, and experiments," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 125764, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Müller, Holger & Kroll, Eike B. & Vogt, Bodo, 2012. "Violations of procedure invariance—The case of preference reversals in monadic and competitive product evaluations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 406-412.
    4. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    5. Roll, Oliver & Loh, Patrick, 2020. "Der Einfluss der Digitalisierung auf das Preismanagement – Ansatzpunkte, Modelle und Methoden," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 74(4), pages 334-348.
    6. Dost, Florian & Wilken, Robert & Eisenbeiss, Maik & Skiera, Bernd, 2014. "On the Edge of Buying: A Targeting Approach for Indecisive Buyers Based on Willingness-to-Pay Ranges," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 393-407.
    7. Kirsten, Johann & Vermeulen, Hes & van Zyl, Karlien & du Rand, Gerrie & du Plessis, Henrietta & Weissnar, Tessa, 2017. "Do South African Consumers have an Appetite for an Origin-based Certification System for Meat Products? A Synthesis of Studies on Perceptions, Preferences and Experiments," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(01), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Dost, Florian & Geiger, Ingmar, 2017. "Value-based pricing in competitive situations with the help of multi-product price response maps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 219-236.
    9. Mwiti, Florine Karuru & Okelo, Julius & Munei, Kimpei, 2015. "Assessment Of Willingness To Pay For Quality Sweetpotato Planting Materials: The Case Of Smallholder Farmers In Tanzania," Dissertations and Theses 269713, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    10. Kim, Min Sung & Kim, Eun & Hwang, ShinYoung & Kim, Junghwan & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Willingness to pay for over-the-top services in China and Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 197-207.
    11. Williams Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Renan Goetz & Victor Owusu, 2021. "Risk, ambiguity and willingness to participate in crop insurance programs: Evidence from a field experiment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(3), pages 679-703, July.
    12. Anna Bassi & Kenneth C. Williams, 2014. "Examining Monotonicity and Saliency Using Level- k Reasoning in a Voting Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Ericka Costa & Dario Montemurro & Diego Giuliani, 2019. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for green cars: a discrete choice analysis in Italy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2425-2442, October.
    14. Dost, Florian & Wilken, Robert, 2012. "Measuring willingness to pay as a range, revisited: When should we care?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 148-166.
    15. Barbara Bigliardi & Domenico Campisi & Giovanna Ferraro & Serena Filippelli & Francesco Galati & Alberto Petroni, 2020. "The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Bogicevic, Vanja & Yang, Wan & Cobanoglu, Cihan & Bilgihan, Anil & Bujisic, Milos, 2016. "Traveler anxiety and enjoyment: The effect of airport environment on traveler's emotions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 122-129.
    17. Jay Lillywhite & Chadelle Robinson, 2023. "Understanding Chile Pepper Consumers’ Preferences: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, September.
    18. Eline Jongmans & Alain Jolibert & Julie Irwin, 2014. "Estimation du poids d'un attribut environnemental : influence et effet des mesures d'évaluation," Post-Print halshs-01185772, HAL.
    19. Jonas R. Jahnert & Hato Schmeiser & Florian Schreiber, 2022. "Pricing strategies in the German term life insurance market: An empirical analysis," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 19-34, April.
    20. Kim, Yanghee & Oyunbold, Bodibold & Roh, Taewoo, 2024. "Capturing OTT users in an emerging market: Insights on quality of OTT service and behavioral intentions through extended technology acceptance model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:83-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.