IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v198y2025i3d10.1007_s10551-024-05820-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?

Author

Listed:
  • Don O’Sullivan

    (Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne)

  • Leon Zolotoy

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Madhu Veeraraghavan

    (TA Pai Management Institute)

  • Jennifer R. Overbeck

    (University of Melbourne)

Abstract

In this study, we explore the relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Drawing on insights from the social psychology literature, we theorize that CEOs are cognizant that their perceived greed has implications for how observers respond to failures in workplace safety. Our theorizing points to a somewhat counterintuitive positive relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Consistent with our theorizing, we find that the relationship is attenuated when the CEO is insulated from how observers respond to firm conduct and is amplified when the CEO’s characteristics have a larger impact on how observers respond to adverse firm-level events. We contribute to business ethics research on executive greed, on the relationship between CEO traits and (ir)responsible corporate conduct, and on the antecedents of workplace safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Don O’Sullivan & Leon Zolotoy & Madhu Veeraraghavan & Jennifer R. Overbeck, 2025. "Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 655-673, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:198:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05820-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05820-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05820-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05820-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:198:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05820-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.