IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Seeds of Dissolution: Discrepancy and Incoherence in Buyer-Supplier Exchange


  • Qiong Wang

    () (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Ujwal Kayande

    () (Research School of Business, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia)

  • Sandy Jap

    () (Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322)


In this research, we examine a novel mechanism of interorganizational relationship dissolution: incoherence in a partner's behavior. We propose that the discrepancy between an exchange partner's opportunistic behavior and the focal firm's expectations may create a state of incoherence and uncertainty and that this effect can be damaging to the exchange even when the partner's behavior is better than expected. Using nearly 500 longitudinal, confidential reports of industrial buyers and sellers, we find supportive evidence that (1) the net effect of the discrepancy is initially positive when behavior is better than expected but becomes rapidly negative thereafter, and (2) the net effect of the discrepancy is always negative when behavior is worse than expected. Thus, these effects will generally damage the exchange even as the partner tries to improve the relationship. This gives insight into why exchange relationships that hit a downward spiral can be difficult, if not impossible, to salvage. We also show that the dysfunctional consequences of discrepancy are mitigated through exchange structures such as the magnitude of dependence on an organizational partner, the development phase of the relationship, and the presence of bilateral idiosyncratic investments. Implications for theory and the management of interorganizational relationships are developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiong Wang & Ujwal Kayande & Sandy Jap, 2010. "The Seeds of Dissolution: Discrepancy and Incoherence in Buyer-Supplier Exchange," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1109-1124, 11-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:29:y:2010:i:6:p:1109-1124

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Artz, Kendall W. & Brush, Thomas H., 2000. "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 337-362, April.
    2. Broniarczyk, Susan M & Alba, Joseph W, 1994. " The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 393-407, December.
    3. Ujwal Kayande & John H. Roberts & Gary L. Lilien & Duncan K. H. Fong, 2007. "Mapping the Bounds of Incoherence: How Far Can You Go and How Does It Affect Your Brand?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 504-513, 07-08.
    4. Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1989. "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 310-323.
    5. Joachim Vosgerau & Erin Anderson & William T. Ross, Jr., 2008. "Can Inaccurate Perceptions in Business-to-Business (B2B) Relationships Be Beneficial?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 205-224, 03-04.
    6. Joskow, Paul L, 1987. "Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments: Empirical Evidence from Coal Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(1), pages 168-185, March.
    7. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. " Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    8. Bruce G. S. Hardie & Eric J. Johnson & Peter S. Fader, 1993. "Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 378-394.
    9. Dick, Alan & Chakravarti, Dipankar & Biehal, Gabriel, 1990. " Memory-Based Inferences during Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 82-93, June.
    10. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Sandy D. Jap & Erin Anderson, 2003. "Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1684-1701, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:spr:manint:v:53:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11575-012-0149-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:kap:mktlet:v:28:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-016-9414-1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Young K. Ro & Hung-Chung Su & Yi-Su Chen, 2016. "A Tale of Two Perspectives on an Impending Supply Disruption," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 3-20, January.
    4. repec:eee:jbrese:v:76:y:2017:i:c:p:14-23 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:29:y:2010:i:6:p:1109-1124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.