IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v24y2005i3p313-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 2004 ISMS Practice Prize Winner—Sales Territory Design: Thirty Years of Modeling and Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Andris A. Zoltners

    (Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201)

  • Prabhakant Sinha

    (ZS Associates, 1800 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, Illinois 60201)

Abstract

Sales territory alignment is the assignment of accounts and their associated selling activities to salespeople and teams. Models, systems, processes, and wisdom have evolved over 1,500 project implementations for 500 companies with 500,000 sales territories. Optimization models have evolved over time to explicitly consider travel time along road networks and customer disruption. Personal computers with continually increasing speeds and storage capabilities, the Internet, and mapping databases have enabled the development of systems that communicate alignments visually to sales managers. Because of their combinatorial complexity, multiple conflicting objectives, and personnel aspects that touch everyone in the salesforce, the alignment models were unable to completely solve the sales territory alignment issues faced by companies. Consequently, processes that add local managerial knowledge were used to communicate and enhance model-derived solutions, while achieving very high implementation rates. The territory alignment team gains knowledge with every sales territory alignment. Alignment insights get codified. Alignment experts improve every model-derived solution. This wisdom becomes part of subsequent alignments and triggers further innovation. Over time, the role of processes and wisdom becomes larger than the role of the models and systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Andris A. Zoltners & Prabhakant Sinha, 2005. "The 2004 ISMS Practice Prize Winner—Sales Territory Design: Thirty Years of Modeling and Implementation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 313-331, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:24:y:2005:i:3:p:313-331
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.1050.0133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernd Skiera & Sönke Albers, 1998. "COSTA: Contribution Optimizing Sales Territory Alignment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 196-213.
    2. Roy J. Shanker & Ronald E. Turner & Andris A. Zoltners, 1975. "Sales Territory Design: An Integrated Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 309-320, November.
    3. John D. C. Little, 1970. "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(8), pages 466-485, April.
    4. Prabhakant Sinha & Andris A. Zoltners, 1979. "The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 503-515, June.
    5. Sidney W. Hess & Stuart A. Samuels, 1971. "Experiences with a Sales Districting Model: Criteria and Implementation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4-Part-II), pages 41-54, December.
    6. Andris A. Zoltners & Prabhakant Sinha, 1983. "Sales Territory Alignment: A Review and Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(11), pages 1237-1256, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastián Moreno & Jordi Pereira & Wilfredo Yushimito, 2020. "A hybrid K-means and integer programming method for commercial territory design: a case study in meat distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 87-117, March.
    2. Echchakoui Said, 2019. "Salespeople’s reward preference methodological analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 24-39, March.
    3. Steven M. Shugan, 2006. "Editorial: Errors in the Variables, Unobserved Heterogeneity, and Other Ways of Hiding Statistical Error," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 203-216, 05-06.
    4. Lilien, Gary L., 2010. "Is academic marketing losing its way? Embrace intermediaries," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 174-176.
    5. Yao, Ming-Jong & Lin, Jen-Yen & Lin, Yu-Liang & Fang, Shu-Cherng, 2020. "An integrated algorithm for solving multi-customer joint replenishment problem with districting consideration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Marc Fischer & Sönke Albers & Nils Wagner & Monika Frie, 2011. "Practice Prize Winner --Dynamic Marketing Budget Allocation Across Countries, Products, and Marketing Activities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 568-585, July.
    7. V. Kumar & Rajkumar Venkatesan & Tim Bohling & Denise Beckmann, 2008. "—The Power of CLV: Managing Customer Lifetime Value at IBM," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 585-599, 07-08.
    8. Syam, Siddhartha S. & Bhatnagar, Amit, 2015. "A decision support model for determining the level of product variety with marketing and supply chain considerations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 12-21.
    9. Gary L. Lilien & John H. Roberts & Venkatesh Shankar, 2013. "Effective Marketing Science Applications: Insights from the ISMS-MSI Practice Prize Finalist Papers and Projects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 229-245, March.
    10. J. Fabián López-Pérez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado, 2013. "Embotelladoras ARCA Uses Operations Research to Improve Territory Design Plans," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 209-220, May-June.
    11. Holtrop, Niels & Wieringa, Jakob & Gijsenberg, Maarten & Stern, P., 2016. "Competitive reactions to personal selling," Research Report 16004-MARK, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    12. Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & Bard, Jonathan F., 2019. "An exact algorithm for designing optimal districts in the collection of waste electric and electronic equipment through an improved reformulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 259-271.
    13. Sandoval, M. Gabriela & Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Pereira, Jordi & Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & Díaz, Juan A., 2022. "A novel districting design approach for on-time last-mile delivery: An application on an express postal company," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Germann, Frank & Lilien, Gary L. & Rangaswamy, Arvind, 2013. "Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 114-128.
    15. Bender, Matthias & Meyer, Anne & Kalcsics, Jörg & Nickel, Stefan, 2016. "The multi-period service territory design problem – An introduction, a model and a heuristic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 135-157.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drexl, Andreas & Haase, Knut, 1996. "Fast approximation methods for sales force deployment," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 411, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Johannes Habel & Sascha Alavi & Nicolas Heinitz, 2023. "A theory of predictive sales analytics adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 34-54, June.
    3. Rui Fragoso & Conceição Rego & Vladimir Bushenkov, 2016. "Clustering of Territorial Areas: A Multi-Criteria Districting Problem," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 14(2), pages 179-198, December.
    4. Bernd Skiera & Sönke Albers, 1998. "COSTA: Contribution Optimizing Sales Territory Alignment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 196-213.
    5. Fernando Tavares-Pereira & José Figueira & Vincent Mousseau & Bernard Roy, 2007. "Multiple criteria districting problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 69-92, October.
    6. Darmon, Rene Y., 2002. "Salespeople's management of customer information: Impact on optimal territory and sales force sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 162-176, February.
    7. Skiera, Bernd & Albers, Sönke, 1993. "COSTA: ein Entscheidungs-Unterstützungs-System zur deckungsbeitragsmaximalen Einteilung von Verkaufsgebieten," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 324, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Tavares Pereira, Fernando & Figueira, José Rui & Mousseau, Vincent & Roy, Bernard, 2009. "Comparing two territory partitions in districting problems: Indices and practical issues," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 72-88, March.
    9. Andreas Drexl & Knut Haase, 1999. "Fast Approximation Methods for Sales Force Deployment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1307-1323, October.
    10. Zhong, Tao & Young, Rhonda, 2010. "Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 128-137, May.
    11. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali & Kevin Lunday, 2012. "The coastal seaspace patrol sector design and allocation problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 483-514, November.
    12. Albers, Sönke, 2012. "Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 111-122.
    13. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2014. "Upper and lower bounds for the sales force deployment problem with explicit contiguity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 677-689.
    14. Fabio Caldieraro & Anne T. Coughlan, 2009. "Optimal Sales Force Diversification and Group Incentive Payments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1009-1026, 11-12.
    15. F Caro & T Shirabe & M Guignard & A Weintraub, 2004. "School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 836-849, August.
    16. Marc Fischer & Sönke Albers & Nils Wagner & Monika Frie, 2011. "Practice Prize Winner --Dynamic Marketing Budget Allocation Across Countries, Products, and Marketing Activities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 568-585, July.
    17. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    18. Sprecher, Arno, 1999. "Sales force deployment by genetic concepts," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 514, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Haase, Knut, 1999. "Sales force deployment by mathematical programming," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 508, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    20. Hyun Kim & Yongwan Chun & Kamyoung Kim, 2015. "Delimitation of Functional Regions Using a p-Regions Problem Approach," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 38(3), pages 235-263, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:24:y:2005:i:3:p:313-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.