IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i1p414-433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Task Characteristics and Incentives in Collaborative Problem Solving: Evidence from Three Field Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Jayarajan Samuel

    (Information Systems and Operations Management, College of Business, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019)

  • Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng

    (Information Systems and Operations Management, Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Vijay Mookerjee

    (Information Systems and Operations Management, Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

Abstract

We study, using three sequential field experiments, collaborative problem solving in knowledge work enabled by information technology within the context of the customer support function in a leading high-technology firm. Experiment one examines the performance change after introducing a new collaborative problem-solving process, specifically whether the use of a team of experts across departments to solve problems can help reduce problem-solving costs. In addition to the extant process of supporting customers using problem solvers within a specific department, the experiment allowed two forms of engaging problem solvers outside the department: (1) formal handover (transferring the task to experts in an external department) and (2) using a new, collaborative process in which experts across two departments jointly work on the task. Interestingly, we find that the cost reduction occurs not because the collaborative process is always superior to formal handover, but because there is a shift of intradepartmental customer support work toward the new collaborative process. Building upon the findings of experiment one, experiment two aims to identify the conditions under which the new collaborative process works or fails. We discover that task features, such as novelty and time constraints, play a significant role in determining the appropriate mode of engaging an external department for problem solving. These findings are then utilized to develop an information system that provides recommendations on how to seek help through either formal handover or collaboration. In experiment three, we examine how users react to the recommendation. We find that local (department level) incentives can cause problem solvers to deviate from machine recommendations. We analyze the underlying reasons for this deviation and demonstrate how global (firm level) incentives can be aligned with local incentives to increase compliance with machine recommendations. The findings of this study offer practical implications for firms that aim to develop and implement information systems to support knowledge-intensive problem-solving tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayarajan Samuel & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Vijay Mookerjee, 2024. "Task Characteristics and Incentives in Collaborative Problem Solving: Evidence from Three Field Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 414-433, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:414-433
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0118
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.0118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:414-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.