IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1217-d1582706.html

Factors Influencing the Productivity of Direct Energy Inputs in EU Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwik Wicki

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Hanna Dudek

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej Parzonko

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz Kusz

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Kaspars Naglis-Liepa

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

Abstract

Agriculture is a major energy consumer and a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. As the world’s population grows, increasing food production while reducing energy use presents a critical challenge. This study examined the trends in direct energy input productivity in agriculture across European Union (EU) countries from 2010 to 2021, focusing on the impact of structural factors, including production scale, mechanization, intensity, and output composition. The results showed a gradual decline in energy productivity, averaging a 1.04% annual decrease, reaching EUR 344,000 per terajoule (TJ) in 2021. Higher mechanization and production intensity improved energy productivity, while larger production scales and a greater share of animal farming had negative effects. Given the current trends of production expansion and extensification, further progress in energy productivity in agriculture appears limited. Policy measures should prioritize optimizing animal production’s share and adopting a sustainable use of renewable energy to lower the dependency on non-renewable fossil fuel sources. Future strategies must balance high agricultural output with sustainable energy consumption per food unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwik Wicki & Hanna Dudek & Andrzej Parzonko & Dariusz Kusz & Kaspars Naglis-Liepa, 2025. "Factors Influencing the Productivity of Direct Energy Inputs in EU Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1217-:d:1582706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    2. Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana Rosa & Jongeneel, Roel & Kros, Hans & Lesschen, Jan Peter & de Vries, Marion & Reijs, Joan & Verhoog, David, 2021. "Aligning agricultural production and environmental regulation: An integrated assessment of the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Shi, Hongxu & Xu, Hao & Gao, Wei & Zhang, Jinhao & Chang, Ming, 2022. "The impact of energy poverty on agricultural productivity: The case of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Adam Wąs & Julia Tsybulska & Piotr Sulewski & Vitaliy Krupin & Grzegorz Rawa & Iryna Skorokhod, 2024. "Energy Efficiency of Polish Farms Following EU Accession (2004–2021)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Banaeian, Narges & Zangeneh, Morteza, 2011. "Study on energy efficiency in corn production of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5394-5402.
    6. Uhlin, Hans-Erik, 1998. "Why energy productivity is increasing: An I-O analysis of Swedish agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 443-465, April.
    7. Liton Chandra Voumik & Md. Azharul Islam & Samrat Ray & Nora Yusma Mohamed Yusop & Abdul Rahim Ridzuan, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions from Renewable and Non-Renewable Electricity Generation Sources in the G7 Countries: Static and Dynamic Panel Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Soltani, Shiva & Mosavi, Seyed Habibollah & Saghaian, Sayed H. & Azhdari, Somayeh & Alamdarlo, Hamed N. & Khalilian, Sadegh, 2023. "Climate change and energy use efficiency in arid and semiarid agricultural areas: A case study of Hamadan-Bahar plain in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Jinxing Wang & Wanming Li & Shamsheer ul Haq & Pomi Shahbaz, 2023. "Adoption of Renewable Energy Technology on Farms for Sustainable and Efficient Production: Exploring the Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Farmer Perception and Government Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Hayakawa, Kazuhiko, 2007. "Small sample bias properties of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 32-38, April.
    11. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    12. Yang Fan & Wu Guoyong & Noman Riaz & Kamila Radlińska, 2024. "Technical efficiency and farm size in the context of sustainable agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(9), pages 446-456.
    13. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    14. Shreesha Pandeya & Buddhi R. Gyawali & Suraj Upadhaya, 2025. "Factors Influencing Precision Agriculture Technology Adoption Among Small-Scale Farmers in Kentucky and Their Implications for Policy and Practice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Willems, Jaap & van Grinsven, Hans J.M. & Jacobsen, Brian H. & Jensen, Tenna & Dalgaard, Tommy & Westhoek, Henk & Kristensen, Ib Sillebak, 2016. "Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 122-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaxue Zhu & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Jiajia Liu & Qingshan Yang, 2025. "The Effect of Agricultural Mechanization Services on the Technical Efficiency of Cotton Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vieira, Flávio & MacDonald, Ronald & Damasceno, Aderbal, 2012. "The role of institutions in cross-section income and panel data growth models: A deeper investigation on the weakness and proliferation of instruments," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 127-140.
    2. Abonazel, Mohamed R., 2016. "Bias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects," MPRA Paper 70628, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ferdi Celikay, 2020. "Dimensions of tax burden: a review on OECD countries," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(49), pages 27-43, March.
    4. Jingping Zuo & Cuncun Qian, 2025. "Assessment for the response and uncertainty of energy poverty to climate extremes in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 16135-16153, July.
    5. Hughes Hallett, Andrew & Bernoth, Kerstin & Lewis, John, 2008. "Did Fiscal Policy Makers Know What They Were Doing? Reassessing Fiscal Policy with Real Time Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 6758, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Kufenko, Vadmin & Prettner, Klaus, 2017. "You can't always get what you want? A Monte Carlo analysis of the bias and the efficiency of dynamic panel data estimators," ECON WPS - Working Papers in Economic Theory and Policy 07/2017, TU Wien, Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Economics Research Unit.
    7. Katsushi S. Imai & Wenya Cheng & Raghav Gaiha, 2017. "Dynamic and long-term linkages among agricultural and non-agricultural growth, inequality and poverty in developing countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 318-338, May.
    8. Moritz Schularick & Solomos Solomou, 2011. "Tariffs and economic growth in the first era of globalization," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 33-70, March.
    9. Hayakawa, Kazuhiko & Nagata, Shuichi, 2016. "On the behaviour of the GMM estimator in persistent dynamic panel data models with unrestricted initial conditions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 265-303.
    10. Maurice J. G. Bun & Frank Windmeijer, 2010. "The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 13(1), pages 95-126, February.
    11. Katsushi S. Imai & Raghav GAIHA & Wenya Cheng, 2015. "Does Agricultural Growth Reduce Inequality and Poverty in Developing Countries?," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-23, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Apr 2016.
    12. Tullio Buccellato & Tomasz Marek Mickiewicz, 2007. "Oil and gas: a blessing for few hydrocarbons and within-region inequality in Russia," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 80, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES), revised Feb 2008.
    13. Seidu, Ayuba & Onel, Gulcan & Moss, Charles Britt, "undated". "Impact of International Remittance on Out-Farm Labor Migration in Developing Countries: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266531, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Kazuhiko Hayakawa & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2012. "Robust Standard Errors in Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models," Working Paper series 38_12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    15. Youssef, Ahmed & Abonazel, Mohamed R., 2015. "Alternative GMM Estimators for First-order Autoregressive Panel Model: An Improving Efficiency Approach," MPRA Paper 68674, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Rostand Arland Yebetchou Tchounkeu & Raffaella Santolini & Giulio Palomba & Elvina Merkaj, 2024. "Healthcare Efficiency And Elderly Mortality In Italy," Working Papers 485, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    17. Maudos, Joaquín & Solís, Liliana, 2009. "The determinants of net interest income in the Mexican banking system: An integrated model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1920-1931, October.
    18. Xiangdong Sun & Ziwen Cheng & Hongxu Shi & Jinhao Zhang, 2025. "Abnormal Temperature and Rural Energy Poverty: A Threshold Effect Analysis Based on the Urban–Rural Gap and the Quality of Rural Housing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Maxime Fajeau, 2021. "Too much finance or too many weak instruments?," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 165, pages 14-36.
    20. Jeffry A. Jacob & Thomas Osang, 2018. "Democracy And Growth: A Dynamic Panel Data Study," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 65(01), pages 41-80, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1217-:d:1582706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.