IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1233-d1672983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Agricultural Mechanization Services on the Technical Efficiency of Cotton Production

Author

Listed:
  • Yaxue Zhu

    (College of Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Guangyao Wang

    (College of Marxism, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    Border Development and Security Governance Research Institute, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    National Ethnic Affairs Commission Shihezi University Research Base for the Chinese National Community, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Huijuan Du

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumchi 830000, China)

  • Jiajia Liu

    (College of Marxism, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Qingshan Yang

    (College of Marxism, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

Abstract

As the process of agricultural modernization accelerates, exploring the impact of agricultural mechanization services on production technology efficiency has become a key issue for enhancing agricultural productivity and promoting sustainable agricultural development. The study focuses on cotton growers in the Tarim River Basin and systematically explores the impact and driving mechanisms of agricultural mechanization services (AMSs) on cotton production’s technical efficiency within the framework of the social–ecological system (SES). By employing a combination of stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and propensity score matching (PSM), the research indicates that the adoption of AMSs significantly enhances the production technical efficiency of cotton farmers. Among the sample that adopted this service, as much as 53.04% of the farmers have their production efficiency within the range of [0.8, 0.9], demonstrating a high production capability. In contrast, the production efficiency values of the farmers who did not adopt such services are more dispersed, with inefficient samples accounting for 11.48%. Furthermore, while the technical efficiency levels across different regions are similar, there are significant efficiency differences within regions. A further analysis indicates that the age of the household head, their education level, the number of agricultural laborers in the family, the proportion of income from planting, and irrigation convenience have a positive impact on farmers’ adoption of AMSs, while the degree of land fragmentation has a negative impact. Therefore, AMSs are not only a core pathway to enhance cotton production’s technical efficiency but also an important support for promoting agricultural modernization in arid areas and strengthening farmers’ risk-resistance capabilities. Future policies should focus on optimizing service delivery, enhancing technical adaptability, and promoting regional collaboration to drive the high-quality development of the cotton industry and support sustainable rural revitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaxue Zhu & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Jiajia Liu & Qingshan Yang, 2025. "The Effect of Agricultural Mechanization Services on the Technical Efficiency of Cotton Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1233-:d:1672983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taylor, Timothy G. & Scott Shonkwiler, J., 1986. "Alternative stochastic specifications of the frontier production function in the analysis of agricultural credit programs and technical efficiency," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 149-160, April.
    2. Kirui, Oliver K. & Kornher, Lukas & Bekchanov, Maksud, 2023. "Productivity growth and the role of mechanisation in African agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(01), February.
    3. Belton, Ben & Win, Myat Thida & Zhang, Xiaobo & Filipski, Mateusz, 2021. "The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Siyu Yang & Wei Li, 2022. "The Impact of Socialized Agricultural Machinery Services on Land Productivity: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Bekele Hundie Kotu & Julius Manda & Christopher Mutungi & Gundula Fischer & Audifas Gaspar, 2023. "Farmers' willingness to invest in mechanized maize shelling and potential financial benefits: Evidence from Tanzania," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 854-874, July.
    6. Zhang, Xiaobo & Yang, Jin & Reardon, Thomas, 2020. "Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 2, pages 71-96, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Alberto Abadie & Guido W. Imbens, 2016. "Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 781-807, March.
    8. Hiroyuki Takeshima, 2018. "Mechanize or exit farming? Multiple‐treatment‐effects model and external validity of adoption impacts of mechanization among Nepalese smallholders," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 1620-1641, November.
    9. Kopp, Raymond J., 1981. "Measuring the technical efficiency of production: A comment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 450-452, December.
    10. Ben Belton & Peixun Fang & Thomas Reardon, 2025. "Combine harvester outsourcing services and seasonal rural non‐farm employment in Myanmar," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 97-124, March.
    11. Yumei Liu & Wuyang Hu & Simon Jetté-Nantel & Zhihong Tian, 2014. "The Influence of Labor Price Change on Agricultural Machinery Usage in Chinese Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(2), pages 219-243, June.
    12. Raymond J. Kopp, 1981. "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: A Reconsideration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 96(3), pages 477-503.
    13. Feng, Meiqing & Chen, Yaning & Duan, Weili & Fang, Gonghuan & li, Zhi & Jiao, Li & Sun, Fan & Li, Yupeng & Hou, Yifeng, 2022. "Comprehensive evaluation of the water-energy-food nexus in the agricultural management of the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    14. Kwaku Boakye & Yu-Feng Lee & Festus F. Annor & Samuel K. N. Dadzie & Iddrisu Salifu, 2024. "Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to Estimate Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Smallholder Pineapple Farmers in Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Stephen F. Hamilton & Timothy J. Richards & Aric P. Shafran & Kathryn N. Vasilaky, 2022. "Farm labor productivity and the impact of mechanization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1435-1459, August.
    16. Fang Wu & Xibao Guo & Xia Guo, 2023. "Cooperative membership and new technology adoption of family farms: Evidence from China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 719-739, September.
    17. Nguyen, Huy Quynh & Warr, Peter, 2020. "Land consolidation as technical change: Economic impacts in rural Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Ludwik Wicki & Hanna Dudek & Andrzej Parzonko & Dariusz Kusz & Kaspars Naglis-Liepa, 2025. "Factors Influencing the Productivity of Direct Energy Inputs in EU Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Isabel Dinis, 2023. "Exploring the Drivers of Microregional Agricultural Labor Productivity: Empirical Insights from Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong Tang & Zhiyou Liu & Feng Huang, 2025. "Digital Literacy, Labor Force Characteristics and the Degree of Adoption of Agricultural Socialized Services: Empirical Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Meng & Zhang, Wuke & Zhu, Xi & Shi, Qinghua, 2024. "Agricultural mechanization and rural worker mobility: Evidence from the Agricultural Machinery Purchase Subsidies programme in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Adane Tufa & Arega Alene & Hambulo Ngoma & Paswel Marenya & Julius Manda & Md Abdul Matin & Christian Thierfelder & David Chikoye, 2024. "Willingness to pay for agricultural mechanization services by smallholder farmers in Malawi," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 248-276, January.
    3. Juan Ai & Lun Hu & Shuhua Xia & Hongling Xiang & Zhaojiu Chen, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Influencing the Adoption Behavior of Agricultural Productive Services Based on Logistic—ISM Model: A Case Study of Rice Farmers in Jiangxi Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Viet Ha Trinh Thi & Wenqi Zhou, 2024. "A Systematic Analysis of the Development of Agricultural Modernization and Its Effect on Crop Production in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Walter Briec & Laurent Cavaignac & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2020. "Input Efficiency Measures: A Generalized, Encompassing Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1836-1849, November.
    6. Yuewen Huo & Songlin Ye & Zhou Wu & Fusuo Zhang & Guohua Mi, 2022. "Barriers to the Development of Agricultural Mechanization in the North and Northeast China Plains: A Farmer Survey," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Kingdom Simfukwe & Moses Majid Limuwa & Friday Njaya, 2022. "Are Chilimira Fishers of Engraulicypris sardella ( Günther , 1868) in Lake Malawi Productive? The Case of Nkhotakota District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Xin Deng & Zhongcheng Yan & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2020. "Land Registration, Adjustment Experience, and Agricultural Machinery Adoption: Empirical Analysis from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Winarno, Kodrad & Sustiyo, Joko & Aziz, Ammar Abdul & Permani, Risti, 2025. "Unlocking agricultural mechanisation potential in Indonesia: Barriers, drivers, and pathways for sustainable agri-food systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Meng Meng & Leng Yu & Xiaohua Yu, 2024. "Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 223-246, March.
    12. Bowei Li & Yanjun Qian & Fanbin Kong, 2023. "Does Outsourcing Service Reduce the Excessive Use of Chemical Fertilizers in Rural China? The Moderating Effects of Farm Size and Plot Size," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Wang, Lulu & Lyu, Jie & Wang, Shanshan & Zhang, Junyan, 2025. "Unveiling the influence of agricultural mechanization on greenhouse gas emission intensity: Insights from China using causal machine learning model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Xiaoheng Zhang & Guiquan Yan & Yucheng He & Hailong Yu, 2022. "Do Disease and Pest Control Outsourcing Services Reduce Arable Land Abandonment? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Ben Belton & Peixun Fang & Thomas Reardon, 2025. "Combine harvester outsourcing services and seasonal rural non‐farm employment in Myanmar," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 97-124, March.
    16. Surendran-Padmaja, Subash & Parlasca, Martin C. & Qaim, Matin & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2025. "Private service provision contributes to widespread innovation adoption among smallholder farmers: Laser land levelling technology in northwestern India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    17. Xue Shen & Quanyu Yang & Ting Qiu & Rongjun Ao, 2023. "Off-Farm Employment, Outsourced Machinery Services, and Farmers’ Ratoon Rice Production Behavior: Evidence from Rice Farmers in Central China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Wangda Liao & Fusheng Zeng & Meseret Chanieabate, 2022. "Mechanization of Small-Scale Agriculture in China: Lessons for Enhancing Smallholder Access to Agricultural Machinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoshi & Ma, Wanglin, 2021. "Effects of Agricultural Mechanization on Land Productivity: Evidence from China," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315143, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Meng Qu & Kai Zhao & Renhui Zhang & Yuan Gao & Jing Wang, 2022. "Divergence between Willingness and Behavior of Farmers to Purchase Socialized Agricultural Services: From a Heterogeneity Perspective of Land Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1233-:d:1672983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.