IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9504-d1779665.html

How Does Digital Consumption Affect Corporate Innovation Activity? Evidence from China’s Information Consumption Pilot Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Aobo Pi

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430048, China)

  • Siyuan Deng

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430048, China)

  • Weifeng Zhao

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430048, China)

  • Jiahui Wang

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430048, China)

Abstract

Amid rapid technological change and industrial transformation, digital consumption (DC) has become both a driver of domestic demand and a potential catalyst for corporate innovation. Yet, systematic evidence on how DC shapes innovation behavior remains limited. This study investigates the causal effect of DC on corporate innovation activity (CIA) by exploiting China’s Information Consumption Pilot Policy (ICPP) as a quasi-natural experiment with firm-level panel data from 2008 to 2022. The results show that DC significantly enhances CIA through three mechanisms: strengthening government attention to science and technology talent, advancing the circulation and utilization of regional data, and promoting corporate data assetization. Moreover, the effect is stronger in eastern regions, in areas with greater governmental digital engagement, and among firms with stronger managerial incentives. Further analysis indicates that DC not only increases overall innovation activity but also disproportionately fosters substantive innovation, as reflected in invention patents. These findings provide new empirical evidence on the differentiated role of DC in shaping both the quantity and quality of corporate innovation, offering insights for the design of digital economy policies in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Aobo Pi & Siyuan Deng & Weifeng Zhao & Jiahui Wang, 2025. "How Does Digital Consumption Affect Corporate Innovation Activity? Evidence from China’s Information Consumption Pilot Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9504-:d:1779665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728.
    2. Lu, Hui Ting & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Digital transformation as an enabler of sustainability innovation and performance – Information processing and innovation ambidexterity perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Luo, Kang & Liu, Yaobin & Chen, Pei-Fen & Zeng, Mingli, 2022. "Assessing the impact of digital economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Hyongmook Cheong & Boyoung Kim & Ivan Ureta Vaquero, 2023. "Data Valuation Model for Estimating Collateral Loans in Corporate Financial Transaction," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    6. Zhang, Jun & Xie, Tangkun & Kong, Xiaoran & Liu, Bo & Zhang, Wenke, 2025. "Can data assets promote green innovation in enterprises?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 625-648, April.
    8. Liu, Jingling & Chen, Yanying & Liang, Feng Helen, 2023. "The effects of digital economy on breakthrough innovations: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    10. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    11. Ndubuisi, Gideon & Otioma, Chuks & Tetteh, Godsway Korku, 2021. "Digital infrastructure and employment in services: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8).
    12. Erik Brynjolfsson & Brian Kahin (ed.), 2002. "Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262523302, December.
    13. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    14. Carmen Elena Stoenoiu & Lorentz Jäntschi, 2024. "Connecting the Computer Skills with General Performance of Companies—An Eastern European Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Yannis Bakos & Erik Brynjolfsson, 1999. "Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits, and Efficiency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(12), pages 1613-1630, December.
    16. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    17. Jingjing Qian & Xiaomin Zhang & Xiang-Wu Yan & Ning Xu, 2024. "Can Information Consumption Promote the Digital Transformation of Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    19. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    20. Guangyao Deng & Jiao Qian, 2025. "How Does the Pilot Information Consumption Policy Affect Urban Carbon Productivity? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from 275 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    21. Yunpeng Fu & Zixuan Wang & Wenjia Zhao, 2025. "The Impact of Information Consumption Pilot Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency: An Empirical Study from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-31, April.
    22. Lili Chen, 2024. "Data assetization and capital market information efficiency: evidence from Hidden Champion SMEs in China," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, December.
    23. Uršič, Dejan & Čater, Tomaž, 2025. "Digital innovation in management and business: A comprehensive review, multi-level framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Yi-Ling Cheng & Juin-Jen Chang, 2017. "The Quality of Intermediate Goods: Growth and Welfare Implications," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(302), pages 434-447, September.
    3. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
    4. Bruno Amable & Jean-Bernard Chatelain & Kirsten Ralf, 2004. ""Deep Pockets": Research and Development Persistence and Economic Growth," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2004 47, Money Macro and Finance Research Group, revised 13 Oct 2004.
    5. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    6. Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall & Andreas Poldahl, 2006. "Is there really an inverted U-shaped relation between competition and R&D?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 101-118.
    7. Zheng, Mingbo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Feng, Suling & Yuan, Xuemei, 2019. "The road to innovation vs. the role of globalization: A dynamic quantile investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 65-83.
    8. Kong, Dongmin & Zhang, Bohui & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "Higher education and corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Jerbashian Vahagn, 2016. "Knowledge licensing in a model of R&D-driven endogenous growth," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 555-579, June.
    10. Trew, Alex, 2009. "Institutions and the Scale Effect," SIRE Discussion Papers 2009-51, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    11. Di Fan & Long Zhao, 2023. "The role of business locations in international patenting," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 43-69, June.
    12. Chen, Jie & Leung, Woon Sau & Evans, Kevin P., 2016. "Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 61-79.
    13. Bessonova, Evguenia & Gonchar, Ksenia, 2019. "How the innovation-competition link is shaped by technology distance in a high-barrier catch-up economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 15-32.
    14. Maha Kalai & Hamdi Becha & Kamel Helali, 2024. "Effect of artificial intelligence on economic growth in European countries: a symmetric and asymmetric cointegration based on linear and non-linear ARDL approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 13(1), pages 1-37, December.
    15. Amable, Bruno & Ledezma, Ivan & Robin, Stéphane, 2016. "Product market regulation, innovation, and productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2087-2104.
    16. Xavier Vives, 2008. "Innovation And Competitive Pressure," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 419-469, December.
    17. Shuai Wang & Fayyaz Ahmad & Yanlong Li & Nabila Abid & Abbas Ali Chandio & Abdul Rehman, 2022. "The Impact of Industrial Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Yang, Jun & Yang, Dingjian & Cheng, Jixin, 2024. "The non-rivalry of data, directed technical change and the environment: A theoretical study incorporating data as a production factor," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 417-448.
    19. Akcigit, Ufuk & Ates, Sina T. & Lerner, Josh & Townsend, Richard R. & Zhestkova, Yulia, 2024. "Fencing off Silicon Valley: Cross-border venture capital and technology spillovers," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 14-39.
    20. Xiaoyang Zhu, 2022. "Corporate tax competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 447-457.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9504-:d:1779665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.