IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5354-d1675780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interaction Effects of Income Tax Incentives and Environmental Tax Levies on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenshuai Wang

    (School of Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Fanchen Meng

    (School of Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Faculty of Economics, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 518000, China)

  • Shang Gao

    (School of Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The enhancements of tax policies and their coordination have emerged as a significant way to promote corporate sustainability, especially in developing economies worldwide. Using panel data from Chinese non-financial A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2022, this study empirically explores the promoting effects of corporate income tax (CIT) incentives and environmental protection tax (EPT) levies on corporate ESG performance. We find that the CIT incentive has a notable positive impact on firms’ ESG behavior, acting on the micro-mechanisms of increasing corporate cash flow and reducing agency costs, and its promoting effect is more salient with regard to the social and governance dimensions. This study also traces the interactive effects between the EPT levy and CIT incentive policies, which boost corporate ESG behavior synergistically. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that these effects are more noticeable in manufacturing firms and non-state-owned firms with severe financing constraints. Environmental tests show that CIT incentive policies have positive effects on green technological innovation, and Chinese enterprises are still experiencing relatively serious negative impacts. The conclusions of this study are conducive to providing theoretical support and policy suggestions for encouraging the sustainable development of companies through the policy combination of environmental regulation and tax incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenshuai Wang & Fanchen Meng & Shang Gao, 2025. "The Interaction Effects of Income Tax Incentives and Environmental Tax Levies on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5354-:d:1675780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5354/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5354/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiaolin & Ye, Yingying, 2024. "Environmental protection tax and firms’ ESG investment: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Ambec, Stefan & Coria, Jessica, 2021. "The informational value of environmental taxes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Qi, Yu & Zhang, Jianshun & Chen, Jianwei, 2023. "Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms’ emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Dittmar, Amy & Mahrt-Smith, Jan, 2007. "Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 599-634, March.
    5. Yongzheng Liu & Jie Mao, 2019. "How Do Tax Incentives Affect Investment and Productivity? Firm-Level Evidence from China," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 261-291, August.
    6. Leming Hu, 2020. "The integration between and common prosperity of government and market: China's experience of economic development," China Political Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(2), pages 289-302, December.
    7. Karen Palmer & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney & Karen Palmer & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney, 2004. "Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 3, pages 53-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. repec:hal:journl:hal-04755369 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lori Bennear & Robert Stavins, 2007. "Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 37(1), pages 111-129, May.
    10. Jinhua Xu & Feisan Ye & Xiaoxia Li, 2024. "Carbon intensity constraint policy and firm green innovation in China: a quasi-DID analysis," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 704-730, February.
    11. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu, 2020. "How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Christian Espinosa-Méndez & Carlos P. Maquieira & José T. Arias, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Performance on the Value of Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Xin Jin & Xue Lei, 2023. "A Study on the Mechanism of ESG’s Impact on Corporate Value under the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Roman Lanis & Grant Richardson & Chelsea Liu & Ross McClure, 2019. "The Impact of Corporate Tax Avoidance on Board of Directors and CEO Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 463-498, December.
    15. Singh, Manohar & Davidson III, Wallace N., 2003. "Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 793-816, May.
    16. Wang, Kai & Li, Tingting & San, Ziyao & Gao, Hao, 2023. "How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Dongheng Han & Zhihui Li & Xun Cui & Lin Liang, 2025. "How Can We Improve the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises?—The Carbon Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Seyedesmaeil Mousavi & Bart Bossink & Mario van Vliet, 2019. "Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high‐tech innovation in science‐based companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 366-387, February.
    19. Tang, Meili & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Tax incentives and corporate social responsibility: The role of cash savings from accelerated depreciation policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    21. Marco Amendola, 2024. "Input additionality of R&D tax reliefs: results from a panel LP-IV approach," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 736-753, July.
    22. James S. Ang & Rebel A. Cole & James Wuh Lin, 2000. "Agency Costs and Ownership Structure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(1), pages 81-106, February.
    23. Peng, Shuijun & Shu, Zhongqiao & Zhang, Wencheng, 2022. "Does service trade liberalization relieve manufacturing enterprises’ financial constraints? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    24. Federica Doni & Marco Fiameni, 2024. "Can innovation affect the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 546-574, February.
    25. Mandell, Svante, 2008. "Optimal mix of emissions taxes and cap-and-trade," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 131-140, September.
    26. Tan, Zhizhou & Zeng, Xianhai & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "How do multiple policy incentives influence investors’ decisions on biomass co-firing combined with carbon capture and storage retrofit projects for coal-fired power plants?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    27. Iman Babiker & Mashael Bakhit & Aida Osman Abdalla Bilal & Ayman Abdalla Mohammed Abubakr & Abubkr Ahmed Elhadi Abdelraheem, 2025. "The Effect of Female Representation on Boards on Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Highly Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
    28. Barros, Victor & Verga Matos, Pedro & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Rino Vieira, Pedro, 2022. "M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    29. Liu, Guangqiang & Zhang, Lingyun & Xie, Ziqin, 2022. "Environmental taxes and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaobing Lai & Lei Quan & Chong Guo & Fan Zhang, 2025. "Can ESG reconcile the conflicting motives of cash holding? Evidence from China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 1719-1756, April.
    2. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    3. Rossi, Fabrizio & Barth, James R. & Cebula, Richard J., 2018. "Do shareholder coalitions affect agency costs? Evidence from Italian-listed companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 181-200.
    4. Li, Xiafei & Luo, Di, 2020. "Increase in cash holdings of U.S. firms: The role of healthcare and technology industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 286-298.
    5. Fabrizio Rossi & Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2020. "Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1149-1181, October.
    6. Xueyan Dong & Kam C. Chan & Yujia Cui & Jenny Xinjiao Guan, 2021. "Strategic deviance and cash holdings," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 742-782, March.
    7. Jiraporn, Pornsit & Kim, Jang-Chul & Kim, Young Sang & Kitsabunnarat, Pattanaporn, 2012. "Capital structure and corporate governance quality: Evidence from the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS)," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 208-221.
    8. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, En-Ze, 2025. "Energy regulation and industrial robot adoption: The role of human capital," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Jiang, Lisha & Zhou, Wei & Hualiang, Wu & Deng, Wei, 2025. "Impact of business environment uncertainty on ESG performance from the perspective of resource supply and demand based on ESG performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1012-1030.
    10. Qi, Yu & Zhang, Jianshun & Chen, Jianwei, 2023. "Tax incentives, environmental regulation and firms’ emission reduction strategies: Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Tiziana La Rocca & Maurizio La Rocca & Francesco Fasano & Alfio Cariola, 2023. "Does a country's environmental policy affect the value of small and medium sized enterprises liquidity in the energy sector?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 277-290, January.
    12. Lin, Ling & Xiao, Min & Yao, Rongrong & Zhang, Xiaoying, 2024. "Product market liberalization and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Li, Xiaoxia & Lin, Jiahua & Tao, Xingye & Xu, Jinhua, 2025. "Does party organization embeddedness boost corporate environmental performance?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Lisa Schopohl, 2020. "State Pension Funds and Corporate Social Responsibility: Do Beneficiaries’ Political Values Influence Funds’ Investment Decisions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 489-516, September.
    15. Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju & Snehith Jacob Kodiyatt & P. P. Nithi Krishna & Geetha Sreelekshmi, 2023. "ESG sentiments and divergent ESG scores: suggesting a framework for ESG rating," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(12), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Walker, Thomas & Fernandes, Alisha & Karami, Moein, 2024. "Corporate resilience during crises and the role of ESG factors: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    17. Du, Kerui & Liu, Xueyue & Zhao, Cheng, 2023. "Environmental regulation mitigates energy rebound effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. McKnight, Phillip J. & Weir, Charlie, 2009. "Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 139-158, May.
    19. Samya Tahir & Mian Sajid Nazir & Muhammad Ali Jibran Qamar & M. Martin Boyer, 2022. "Ineffective implementation of corporate governance? A call for greater transparency to reduce agency cost," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1528-1547, July.
    20. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5354-:d:1675780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.