IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10938-d1543119.html

Investor–Firm Interactions and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofeng Liu

    (School of Accounting, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
    Department of Economics, The Engineering & Technical College, Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, China)

  • Zhi Wang

    (School of Accounting, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Shichi Ren

    (School of Accounting, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Drawing from a dataset of companies listed on the A-share market from 2010 to 2022 in China, this study explores how investor–firm interactions on Hudongyi and E-hudong affect corporate ESG performance. The findings demonstrate that interactions between investors and companies significantly enhance the ESG performance of corporations. The impact is particularly pronounced for firms with greater institutional investment, heightened media scrutiny, and those operating in more polluting sectors. We also confirm that ESG-related interactions enhance firms’ ESG performance more significantly than non-ESG-related interactions. Potential mechanisms encompass the “oversight and governance” mechanism and the “reputational compensation” mechanism. Further analysis reveals that investor–firm interactions have a greater positive effect on the S- and G-aspects of ESG. Additionally, we also rule out the “pandering hypothesis”, “noise hypothesis”, and “surplus manipulation hypothesis”, thus ensuring the robustness of the conclusions. The core findings remain consistent, even after conducting various tests for endogeneity and robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofeng Liu & Zhi Wang & Shichi Ren, 2024. "Investor–Firm Interactions and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-33, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10938-:d:1543119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiang Li & Tian Li & Hongtao Chen & Erwei Xiang & Wenjuan Ruan, 2019. "Executives' excess compensation, legitimacy, and environmental information disclosure in Chinese heavily polluting companies: The moderating role of media pressure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 248-256, January.
    2. Chen, Tao & Dong, Hui & Lin, Chen, 2020. "Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 483-504.
    3. David S. Lee & Justin McCrary & Marcelo J. Moreira & Jack Porter, 2022. "Valid t-Ratio Inference for IV," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(10), pages 3260-3290, October.
    4. Bushee, Brian J. & Matsumoto, Dawn A. & Miller, Gregory S., 2003. "Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 149-180, January.
    5. Borghesi, Richard & Houston, Joel F. & Naranjo, Andy, 2014. "Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 164-181.
    6. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1643-1671, August.
    7. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    8. Green, T. Clifton & Jame, Russell & Markov, Stanimir & Subasi, Musa, 2014. "Access to management and the informativeness of analyst research," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 239-255.
    9. Baloria, Vishal P. & Heese, Jonas, 2018. "The effects of media slant on firm behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 184-202.
    10. Ioanna Boulouta, 2013. "Hidden Connections: The Link Between Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 185-197, March.
    11. Hales, Jeffrey, 2009. "Are investors really willing to agree to disagree? An experimental investigation of how disagreement and attention to disagreement affect trading behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 230-241, March.
    12. Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2000. "Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 773-806, April.
    13. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    14. Wang, Yizhi & Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Songhe, 2023. "Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    15. Michael S. Drake & Darren T. Roulstone & Jacob R. Thornock, 2012. "Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches Around Earnings Announcements," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(4), pages 1001-1040, September.
    16. Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2008. "All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 785-818, April.
    17. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    18. Arno Riedl & Paul Smeets, 2017. "Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(6), pages 2505-2550, December.
    19. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    20. Ying Wu & Haiyan Li & Qinglong Gou & Jibao Gu, 2017. "Supply chain models with corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6732-6759, November.
    21. Blankespoor, Elizabeth, 2022. "Understanding investor interaction with firm information: A discussion of Lee and Zhong (2022)," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    22. Brian J. Bushee & Michael J. Jung & Gregory S. Miller, 2011. "Conference Presentations and the Disclosure Milieu," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 49(5), pages 1163-1192, December.
    23. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y. & Mishra, Dev R., 2011. "Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2388-2406, September.
    24. Maria Baldini & Lorenzo Dal Maso & Giovanni Liberatore & Francesco Mazzi & Simone Terzani, 2018. "Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 79-98, June.
    25. Xu, Weidong & Luo, Zijun & Li, Donghui, 2024. "Investor–firm interactions and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    26. George Serafeim & Aaron Yoon, 2023. "Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreement," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1500-1530, September.
    27. Bouteska, Ahmed & Cardillo, Giovanni & Harasheh, Murad, 2023. "Is it all about noise? Investor sentiment and risk nexus: evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    28. Gregory S. Miller & Douglas J. Skinner, 2015. "The Evolving Disclosure Landscape: How Changes in Technology, the Media, and Capital Markets Are Affecting Disclosure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(2), pages 221-239, May.
    29. Zhihong Wang & Tien‐Shih Hsieh & Joseph Sarkis, 2018. "CSR Performance and the Readability of CSR Reports: Too Good to be True?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 66-79, January.
    30. Gu, Yan & Ho, Kung-Cheng & Yan, Cheng & Gozgor, Giray, 2021. "Public environmental concern, CEO turnover, and green investment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    31. Elizabeth Blankespoor & Ed Dehaan & John Wertz & Christina Zhu, 2019. "Why Do Individual Investors Disregard Accounting Information? The Roles of Information Awareness and Acquisition Costs," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 57(1), pages 53-84, March.
    32. Xie, Yi & Jiang, Jinwen & Wang, Dong, 2024. "Green finance policy and labor demand: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    33. Feng, Xunan & Johansson, Anders C., 2019. "Top executives on social media and information in the capital market: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 824-857.
    34. Zhice Cheng & Xinyuan Chen & Huwei Wen, 2022. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    35. Casavecchia, Lorenzo & Hulley, Hardy, 2018. "Are mutual fund investors paying for noise?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 8-23.
    36. W. Brooke Elliott & Stephanie M. Grant & Frank D. Hodge, 2018. "Negative News and Investor Trust: The Role of $Firm and #CEO Twitter Use," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(5), pages 1483-1519, December.
    37. Kim, Taehyun & Kim, Yongjun, 2024. "Does corporate environmental responsibility create value?: The role of investors’ ESG preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    38. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    39. Alexander Dyck & Natalya Volchkova & Luigi Zingales, 2008. "The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1093-1135, June.
    40. Boubakri, Narjess & El Ghoul, Sadok & Wang, He & Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y., 2016. "Cross-listing and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 123-138.
    41. Dyck, Alexander & Lins, Karl V. & Roth, Lukas & Wagner, Hannes F., 2019. "Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 693-714.
    42. Jūra Liaukonytė & Alminas Žaldokas, 2022. "Background Noise? TV Advertising Affects Real-Time Investor Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2465-2484, April.
    43. Xia, Dehua & Shi, Junfeng, 2024. "Individual investors’ online voice and corporate environmental information disclosure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinping Ji & Xinjian Huang, 2025. "ESG Performance and Corporate M&A Behavior—Based on the Dual Perspectives of the Quantity and Quality of M&As," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    2. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    3. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    4. Ruan, Lei & Yang, Liwen, 2025. "Investor-company interactions and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    6. Ma, Rufei & Chen, Yuhua & Ji, Qiang & Zhai, Pengxiang, 2025. "How does environmental regulatory stringency shape ESG? Evidence from cross-listing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB).
    7. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Zhu, Bo & Wang, Yansen, 2024. "Does social trust affect firms' ESG performance?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Lin, Le & Li, Nongwen, 2026. "Investor risk concern and opportunistic insider sales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Jonathan Taglialatela & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa & Fabio Iraldo, 2024. "Blockholders and the ESG performance of M&A targets," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 625-650, June.
    11. Lawrence, Alastair, 2013. "Individual investors and financial disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 130-147.
    12. Chaudhry, Neeru & Dhawan, Priya, 2025. "Does firms' commitment towards CSR influence idiosyncratic volatility? Evidence from India," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Li, Yi & Wang, Pengfei & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Individual investors matter: The effect of investor-firm interactions on corporate earnings management," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Cao, Qilin & Ren, Qian & Wang, Wenke & Ren, Mengxi & Jia, Haochen, 2025. "Can readability of the ESG report alleviate rating divergence?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Dongmin Kong & Jia Liu & Yanan Wang & Ling Zhu, 2024. "Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 177-199, January.
    16. Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella & Santilli, Gianluca, 2023. "Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the European banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Wang, Xunxiao & Li, Luxi & Bian, Shibo, 2024. "Irrelevant answers in customers’ earnings communication conferences and suppliers’ cash holdings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Wang, Yizhi & Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Songhe, 2023. "Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Guo, Kun & Bian, Yuan & Zhang, Dayong & Ji, Qiang, 2024. "ESG performance and corporate external financing in China: The role of rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Hyejin Park & Jiyoon Lee & Jewon Shin, 2024. "How Does Taxation Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from a Korean Tax Reform," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 745-774, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10938-:d:1543119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.