IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10891-d1542261.html

Towards Effective Integrated Risk Management: Enhancing Compliance and Competitiveness for Sustainable Access to the EU Citrus Market

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha A. Phologane

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, P.O. Box 1906, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Lucrecia Valentine

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, P.O. Box 1906, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Bingwen Yan

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, P.O. Box 1906, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Tatjana Tambovceva

    (Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Governance and Security Institute, Riga Technical University, Kalnciema Street 6, Room 506, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The tightening of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations, along with stringent private standards in international fresh produce trade, requires citrus producers, especially in developing regions, to adopt robust compliance mechanisms. This study examines the integration of a Risk Management System (RMS) into the existing Quality Management System (QMS) of citrus producers in the Western Cape (WC), South Africa, aimed at improving adherence to European Union (EU) market requirements. Through a comprehensive survey of citrus producers, the research identifies the primary barriers to effective risk management integration, such as financial constraints, limited human resources, and the prevalent non-compliance in the export chain, including pest infestations and exceeding Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs). The results highlight the fact that producers of varying scales face substantial challenges in resource allocation for RMS implementation. The study advocates for a strategic, top-down integration approach, which includes targeted financial support, the establishment of dedicated teams, and well-structured implementation plans. Additionally, the role of both governmental and private sector support is emphasised, particularly in providing training, technical assistance, and infrastructure investments to strengthen compliance efforts. These actions are crucial for ensuring sustained market access, enhancing the competitiveness of citrus producers, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha A. Phologane & Lucrecia Valentine & Bingwen Yan & Tatjana Tambovceva, 2024. "Towards Effective Integrated Risk Management: Enhancing Compliance and Competitiveness for Sustainable Access to the EU Citrus Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10891-:d:1542261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Engler, Alejandra & Nahuelhual, Laura & Cofré, Gabriela & Barrena, Jose, 2012. "How far from harmonization are sanitary, phytosanitary and quality-related standards? An exporter’s perception approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 162-170.
    2. Marina Murina & Alessandro Nicita, 2017. "Trading with Conditions: The Effect of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on the Agricultural Exports from Low-income Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 168-181, January.
    3. Maertens, Miet & Swinnen, Johan, 2015. "Agricultural trade and development: A value chain perspective," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2015-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Melo, Oscar & Engler, Alejandra & Nahuehual, Laura & Cofre, Gabriela & Barrena, José, 2014. "Do Sanitary, Phytosanitary, and Quality-related Standards Affect International Trade? Evidence from Chilean Fruit Exports," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 350-359.
    5. Sean D. Moore, 2021. "Biological Control of a Phytosanitary Pest ( Thaumatotibia leucotreta ): A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Geraldin M. W. Lengai & Alex M. Fulano & James W. Muthomi, 2022. "Improving Access to Export Market for Fresh Vegetables through Reduction of Phytosanitary and Pesticide Residue Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akin-Olagunju, O. & Yusuf, S. & Okoruwa, V., 2018. "Harmonization of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in Cocoa Trade: How Competitive are the Major Exporting Countries?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277463, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Pavez, Iciar & Codron, Jean-Marie & Lubello, Pasquale & Florêncio, Maria Cecilia, 2019. "Biosecurity institutions and the choice of contracts in international fruit supply chains," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. DeMaria Federica & Drogue Sophie & Lubello Pasquale, 2021. "The impact of pest risk management measures on trade: the case of apples from France and Chile," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Donald Larson & Will Martin & Sebnem Sahin & Marinos Tsigas, 2016. "Agricultural Policies and Trade Paths in Turkey," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 1194-1224, August.
    5. Jacopo Timini & Marina Conesa, 2019. "Chinese Exports and Non-Tariff Measures: Testing for Heterogeneous Effects at the Product Level," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 34(2), pages 327-345.
    6. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "On the trade effects of bilateral SPS measures in developed and developing countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(10), pages 3109-3145, October.
    7. Losilla Solano, Luis Vinicio & Brümmer, Bernhard & Engler, Alejandra & Otter, Verena, 2019. "Effects of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification and product diversification on export performance: Evidence from the Chilean fresh fruit export sector," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Anirudh Shingal & Malte Ehrich & Liliana Foletti, 2021. "Re‐estimating the effect of heterogeneous standards on trade: Endogeneity matters," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 756-787, March.
    9. Xuejun Wang & Xiaoqi Zhang & Dan Meng & Harry M. Kaiser, 2022. "The Effects of Product Standards on Trade: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from China," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 232-249, June.
    10. Dmitri Kirpichev & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "The costs of trade protectionism: evidence from Spanish firms and non-tariff measures," Working Papers 1814, Banco de España.
    11. Soliman, Salma & Papanastassiou, Marina & Saka-Helmhout, Ayse, 2023. "The role of subsidiaries in Global Value Chains (GVCs): An institutional voids perspective on LVC upgrading and integration," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    12. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Jacopo Timini & Nicola Cortinovis & Fernando López Vicente, 2022. "The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements with labour provisions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 2820-2853, September.
    14. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Armbruster, Walt & Young, Robert, . "Big Data's Potential to Improve Food Supply Chain Environmental Sustainability and Food Safety," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(A), pages 1-18.
    15. Ranjan, K.R.H.M. & Edirisinghe, J.C., . "The Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on Sri Lankan Tea Trade: A Bayesian Inference of the Gravity Model," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 21(01).
    16. Foletti, Liliana & MILE 02, Anirudh Shingal, 2014. "Stricter regulation boosts exports: the case of Maximum Residue Levels in pesticides," Papers 836, World Trade Institute.
    17. Li Li & Changyao Shan & Qiang Xu & Baishu Li & Haijun Liu & Tao Liu, 2025. "Unveiling the Regulatory Mechanisms of Irradiation Response in Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi Under Hypoxic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Jacopo Timini & Francesca Viani, 2022. "A highway across the Atlantic? Trade and welfare effects of the EU-Mercosur agreement," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 169, pages 291-308.
    19. Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor & Insa Flachsbarth & Amjad Masood & Bernhard Brümmer, 2020. "Does GlobalGAP certification promote agrifood exports? [Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 247-272.
    20. Montalbano, P. & Pietrelli, R. & Salvatici, L., 2018. "Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 81-98.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10891-:d:1542261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.