IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p194-d1307212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Thinking Green to Riding Green: A Study on Influencing Factors in Electric Vehicle Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Farrukh Rafiq

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Jeddah-M Campus, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eden Samuel Parthiban

    (Department of Management Studies, NIT Hamirpur, Hamirpur 177005, India)

  • Yaisna Rajkumari

    (Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities & Management, NIT Delhi, Delhi 110036, India)

  • Mohd Adil

    (Department of Management Studies, NIT Hamirpur, Hamirpur 177005, India)

  • Mohd Nasir

    (Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar 144411, India)

  • Nikhil Dogra

    (Department of Management Studies, NIT Hamirpur, Hamirpur 177005, India)

Abstract

Recent changes in national and international environmental policy place a lot of emphasis on electric vehicles (EVs) as they reduce ecological damage by eliminating emissions. However, given the products’ novelty, consumers have expressed mixed emotions about EV purchases. Skepticism surrounding EV reliability is a significant concern for potential adopters, primarily due to a lack of essential support. As a result, to resolve the problem of consumers’ mixed emotions toward EVs, it is necessary to understand how consumer environmental concerns (EC), attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control shape consumers’ intentions. Leveraging the modified and expanded version of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the current study developed and validated a conceptual model and hypotheses through cross-sectional research. Employing the snowball sampling method, we collected data from 274 respondents via an online survey. The study establishes that social pressure can impact individual ATT, fostering enduring benefits for respondentsʹ EC and behavioral intentions. Consequently, active involvement by EV manufacturers in advocating sustainable consumption is paramount to catalyzing future market growth. Our research is a ground-breaking attempt to determine EV interest among consumers. The nuanced findings hold implications for marketers/practitioners involved on the supply side of the EV business.

Suggested Citation

  • Farrukh Rafiq & Eden Samuel Parthiban & Yaisna Rajkumari & Mohd Adil & Mohd Nasir & Nikhil Dogra, 2023. "From Thinking Green to Riding Green: A Study on Influencing Factors in Electric Vehicle Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:194-:d:1307212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Muhammad Fazal‐e‐Hasan & Hormoz Ahmadi & Harjit Sekhon & Gary Mortimer & Mohd Sadiq & Husni Kharouf & Muhammad Abid, 2023. "The role of green innovation and hope in employee retention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 220-239, January.
    2. Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Noel, Lance & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "The market case for electric mobility: Investigating electric vehicle business models for mass adoption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Anil Khurana & V. V. Ravi Kumar & Manish Sidhpuria, 2020. "A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 23-34, March.
    4. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    5. Xiong, Hang & Payne, Diane & Kinsella, Stephen, 2016. "Peer effects in the diffusion of innovations: Theory and simulation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2021. "Improving companies' impacts on sustainable development: A nexus approach to the SDGS," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3703-3720, December.
    7. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & David P. McIntyre & Arati Srinivasan, 2017. "Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 141-160, January.
    8. Nikhil Dogra & Mohd Adil & Aruna Dhamija & Mukesh Kumar & Mohd Nasir, 2022. "What makes a community sustainably developed? A review of 25 years of sustainable community tourism literature," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 585-606, October.
    9. Marco Bardus & May A. Massoud, 2022. "Predicting the Intention to Sort Waste at Home in Rural Communities in Lebanon: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    2. Paolo E. Giordani & Francesco Rullani, 2020. "The Digital Revolution and COVID-19," Working Papers 06, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    3. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy & Anna Roberts & Le Xu, 2022. "Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 447-475, March.
    5. Chang Jing & Hou Ke & Zhu Yangpeng, 2023. "Performance investment and price decisions of two‐sided platforms under multiple quality regulation strategies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2148-2158, June.
    6. van de Kaa, Geerten & Papachristos, George & de Bruijn, Hans, 2019. "The governance of platform development processes: A metaphor and a simulation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 190-203.
    7. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    8. Jingtao Yi & Jinqiu He & Lihong Yang, 2019. "Platform heterogeneity, platform governance and complementors’ product performance: an empirical study of the mobile application industry," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Mosterd, Lars & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Ding, Aaron Yi & de Reuver, Mark, 2021. "Context dependent trade-offs around platform-to-platform openness: The case of the Internet of Things," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Knudsen, Eirik Sjåholm & Lien, Lasse B. & Timmermans, Bram & Belik, Ivan & Pandey, Sujit, 2021. "Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 360-369.
    11. Liang Chen & Noman Shaheer & Jingtao Yi & Sali Li, 2019. "The international penetration of ibusiness firms: Network effects, liabilities of outsidership and country clout," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 172-192, March.
    12. Jørgen Veisdal, 2020. "The dynamics of entry for digital platforms in two-sided markets: a multi-case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 539-556, September.
    13. Saeed Khanagha & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Sotirios Paroutis & Luciano Oviedo, 2022. "Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 476-506, March.
    14. Nathalie Lazaric & Fabrice Guel & Jean Belin & Vanessa Oltra & Sébastien Lavaud & Ali Douai, 2020. "Determinants of sustainable consumption in France: the importance of social influence and environmental values," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1366, November.
    15. Daniel Fürstenau & Carolin Auschra & Stefan Klein & Martin Gersch, 2019. "A process perspective on platform design and management: evidence from a digital platform in health care," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 581-596, December.
    16. Pundziene, Asta & Gerulaitiene, Neringa & Bez, Sea Matilda & Georgescu, Irène & Mathieu, Christopher & Carrabina-Bordoll, Jordi & Rialp-Criado, Josep & Nieminen, Hannu & Varri, Alpo & Boethius, Susann, 2023. "Value capture and embeddedness in social-purpose-driven ecosystems. A multiple-case study of European digital healthcare platforms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Sinéad Monaghan & Esther Tippmann & Nicole Coviello, 2020. "Born digitals: Thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(1), pages 11-22, February.
    18. Joost Rietveld & Joe N. Ploog, 2022. "On top of the game? The double‐edged sword of incorporating social features into freemium products," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1182-1207, June.
    19. Bhatti, Waheed Akbar & Vahlne, Jan-Erik & Glowik, Mario & Larimo, Jorma Antero, 2022. "The impact of industry 4.0 on the 2017 version of the Uppsala model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4).
    20. Knudsen, Eirik Sjåholm & Belik, Ivan, 2023. "The Achilles heel of interconnected user networks: Network firms and the vulnerability of rapid decline," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:194-:d:1307212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.