IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3425-d1067300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Performance of China’s Industrial System Considering Technological Heterogeneity and Interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Li

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
    School of Business, Applied Technology College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215325, China)

  • Ruizeng Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China
    School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Feihua Huang

    (School of Business, Soochow University, Suzhou 215012, China)

Abstract

The industrial sector, the backbone of China’s economic development, is a key field that requires environmental management. The purpose of this study is to propose an improved data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to analyze the performance of provincial industrial systems (ISs) from 2011 to 2020 in China. To comprehensively characterize the operational framework of ISs, this study proposes an improved meta-frontier network DEA model. Unlike the existing models, the one proposed in this study not only considers the technical heterogeneity of ISs, but also reflects the interaction between IS subsystems. The empirical analysis yields valuable research findings. First, the overall environmental performance of Chinese ISs is generally low, with an average performance of 0.50, showing a U-shaped trend during the study period. Furthermore, significant regional differences are observed in the environmental performance of Chinese ISs. Second, the average performance of the production subsystem is 0.75, while the average performance of the pollution control subsystem (PTS) is 0.44. The low performance of the PTS pulls down the overall performance of Chinese ISs. Third, the technological level of Chinese ISs is low, with about 50% improvement potential. Finally, targeted suggestions to promote the green development of ISs are proposed on the basis of the empirical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Li & Ruizeng Zhao & Feihua Huang, 2023. "Environmental Performance of China’s Industrial System Considering Technological Heterogeneity and Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3425-:d:1067300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 217-234, Springer.
    2. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "A survey of DEA applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 893-902.
    3. Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Malin Song, 2017. "Measuring energy and environmental performance for regions in China by using DEA-based Malmquist indices," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-735, October.
    4. Zhu, Qingyuan & Aparicio, Juan & Li, Feng & Wu, Jie & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Determining closest targets on the extended facet production possibility set in data envelopment analysis: Modeling and computational aspects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 927-939.
    5. Yao, Xin & Guo, Chengwen & Shao, Shuai & Jiang, Zhujun, 2016. "Total-factor CO2 emission performance of China’s provincial industrial sector: A meta-frontier non-radial Malmquist index approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1142-1153.
    6. Tao Ding & Huaqing Wu & Qianzhi Dai & Zhixiang Zhou & Changchun Tan, 2020. "Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Urban Agglomerations in China: A Non-Parametric Meta-Frontier Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 2977-2992, October.
    7. Ning Ma & Yanrui Wu & Jianxin Wu, 2018. "Environmental efficiency and its distribution dynamics in Chinese cities," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 417-445, October.
    8. Li, Ke & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 230-241.
    9. Xiaoling Wang & Feng He & Linfeng Zhang & Lili Chen, 2018. "Energy Efficiency of China’s Iron and Steel Industry from the Perspective of Technology Heterogeneity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Yin, Jianhua & Zheng, Mingzheng & Chen, Jian, 2015. "The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-108.
    11. Chen, Lei & Huang, Yan & Li, Mei-Juan & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2020. "Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 219-229.
    12. Qu, Jingjing & Wang, Baohui & Liu, Xiaohong, 2022. "A modified super-efficiency network data envelopment analysis: Assessing regional sustainability performance in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    13. Wu, Wei & Zhang, Tingting & Xie, Xiaomin & Huang, Zhen, 2021. "Regional low carbon development pathways for the Yangtze River Delta region in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Wen, Huwei & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zhou, Fengxiu, 2021. "Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Huang, Jian-Bai & Luo, Yu-Mei & Feng, Chao, 2019. "An overview of carbon dioxide emissions from China's ferrous metal industry: 1991-2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 541-549.
    16. Yongjun Li & Xiao Shi & Ali Emrouznejad & Liang Liang, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation of Chinese industrial systems: a network SBM approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(6), pages 825-839, June.
    17. Zhang, Lin & Zhao, Linlin & Zha, Yong, 2021. "Efficiency evaluation of Chinese regional industrial systems using a dynamic two-stage DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Huang-Chu Huang & Cheng-Feng Hu, 2021. "Performance Measurement for the Recycling Production System Using Cooperative Game Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Wang, Qunwei & Hang, Ye & Su, Bin & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: An integrated decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 12-25.
    20. Jie Wu & Beibei Xiong & Qingxian An & Jiasen Sun & Huaqing Wu, 2017. "Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 257-276, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai He & Nan Zhu & Wu Jiang & Chuanjin Zhu, 2022. "Efficiency Evaluation of Chinese Provincial Industrial System Based on Network DEA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Linlin Zhao & Lin Zhang & Yong Zha, 2019. "Industrial Efficiency Evaluation in China: A Nonparametric Production-Frontier Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    4. Zha, Donglan & Yang, Guanglei & Wang, Qunwei, 2019. "Investigating the driving factors of regional CO2 emissions in China using the IDA-PDA-MMI method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Xiangyu Teng & Liang Chun Lu & Yung-ho Chiu, 2018. "Considering Emission Treatment for Energy-Efficiency Improvement and Air Pollution Reduction in China’s Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Tao Xu & Jianxin You & Hui Li & Luning Shao, 2020. "Energy Efficiency Evaluation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Zhang, Lin & Zhao, Linlin & Zha, Yong, 2021. "Efficiency evaluation of Chinese regional industrial systems using a dynamic two-stage DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Zhenxiang Cao & Liqing Peng, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economics on Environmental Quality: A System Dynamics Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    9. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Alizadeh, Reza & Gharizadeh Beiragh, Ramin & Soltanisehat, Leili & Soltanzadeh, Elham & Lund, Peter D., 2020. "Performance evaluation of complex electricity generation systems: A dynamic network-based data envelopment analysis approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    12. Boccali, Filippo & Mariani, Marcello M. & Visani, Franco & Mora-Cruz, Alexandra, 2022. "Innovative value-based price assessment in data-rich environments: Leveraging online review analytics through Data Envelopment Analysis to empower managers and entrepreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Cheng, Zhonghua & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Jun & Zhang, Huiming, 2018. "Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 330-339.
    14. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2021. "The win-win ability of environmental protection and economic development during China's transition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Ze Tian & Fang-Rong Ren & Qin-Wen Xiao & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Ma Hewen & Geng Baoxia & Fu Yingxiong & Sun Yi & Sun Zhao, 2021. "Efficiency Analysis of Industrial Water Treatment in China Based on Two-stage Undesirable Fixed-sum Output DEA Model," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(6), pages 660-680, December.
    17. Li, Ding & Gao, Ming & Hou, Wenxuan & Song, Malin & Chen, Jiandong, 2020. "A modified and improved method to measure economy-wide carbon rebound effects based on the PDA-MMI approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Fengyi Lin & Sheng-Wei Lin & Wen-Min Lu, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry: A New Hybrid Model Using Combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Two-Stage Additive Network Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Khalil Md Nor & Seyed Meysam Khoshnava, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Economics: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art and Recent Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Jiasen Sun & Guo Li, 2022. "Optimizing emission reduction task sharing: technology and performance perspectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 581-602, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3425-:d:1067300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.