IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jossai/v9y2021i6p660-680n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Analysis of Industrial Water Treatment in China Based on Two-stage Undesirable Fixed-sum Output DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ma Hewen
  • Geng Baoxia
  • Fu Yingxiong

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Hubei University, Wuhan430062, China)

  • Sun Yi

    (School of Finance, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu233030, China)

  • Sun Zhao

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau999078, China)

Abstract

China is a country with the most water consumption, so it is lack of water resources. Industry has brought serious water pollution while driving economic development, which leads to the destruction of ecological environment. With the improvement of environmental awareness, many scholars have shifted their research direction to how to improve the ecological environment. Most studies consider the whole system as a “black box”, regardless of its internal structure. Therefore, a method to identify inefficiency is necessary and some suggestions for optimization are given. In this paper, a two-stage undesirable fixed-sum output data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is proposed. The industrial chemical oxygen demand (COD) emission during 2011–2015 are adjusted, and the efficiency values are calculated by heuristic search algorithm. The efficiency of 30 provinces and cities is divided into eastern, central and western regions. The model can identify the inefficient stage in industrial system, and find the source of low efficiency in the system. The analysis shows that the efficiency of eastern region is the highest, while the overall efficiency is inclined to the pollutant treatment stage. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions for the low efficiency areas, which can save water while ensuring economic benefits, and provide new direction for water pollution reduction and improve the ecological environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma Hewen & Geng Baoxia & Fu Yingxiong & Sun Yi & Sun Zhao, 2021. "Efficiency Analysis of Industrial Water Treatment in China Based on Two-stage Undesirable Fixed-sum Output DEA Model," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(6), pages 660-680, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:660-680:n:2
    DOI: 10.21078/JSSI-2021-660-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2021-660-21
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21078/JSSI-2021-660-21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongjun Li & Xiao Shi & Ali Emrouznejad & Liang Liang, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation of Chinese industrial systems: a network SBM approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(6), pages 825-839, June.
    2. Yang, Min & Li, Yong Jun & Liang, Liang, 2015. "A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 209-217.
    3. Xie, Qiwei & Hu, Ping & Jiang, An & Li, Yongjun, 2019. "Carbon emissions allocation based on satisfaction perspective and data envelopment analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 254-264.
    4. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 217-234, Springer.
    5. Liang Liang & Feng Yang & Wade Cook & Joe Zhu, 2006. "DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 35-49, July.
    6. Atakelty Hailu & Terrence S. Veeman, 2001. "Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 605-616.
    7. Meiqiang Wang & Yingwen Chen & Zhixiang Zhou, 2020. "A Novel Stochastic Two-Stage DEA Model for Evaluating Industrial Production and Waste Gas Treatment Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Xie, Qiwei & Xu, Qifan & Zhu, Da & Rao, Kaifeng & Dai, Qianzhi, 2020. "Fair allocation of wastewater discharge permits based on satisfaction criteria using data envelopment analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Liang Liang & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2008. "DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 643-653, October.
    10. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2008. "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 418-429, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Tsaples & Jason Papathanasiou & Andreas C. Georgiou, 2022. "An Exploratory DEA and Machine Learning Framework for the Evaluation and Analysis of Sustainability Composite Indicators in the EU," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Joe Zhu, 2022. "DEA under big data: data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 761-783, February.
    3. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    4. Jianhui Xie & Qiwei Xie & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2021. "Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 453-480, September.
    5. Yu Shi & Anyu Yu & Huong Ngo Higgins & Joe Zhu, 2021. "Shared and unsplittable performance links in network DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 507-528, August.
    6. Mohammad Amirkhan & Hosein Didehkhani & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Ashkan Hafezalkotob, 2018. "Measuring Performance of a Three-Stage Network Structure Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Nash Bargaining Game: A Supply Chain Application," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1429-1467, September.
    7. Hadi Ghafoorian & NikIntan Norhan & Mohammed Ndaliman Abubakar & Fazel Mohammadi Nodeh, 2013. "Efficiency Considering Credit Risk in Banking Industry, Using Two-stage DEA," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(8), pages 356-360.
    8. Ang, Sheng & Liu, Pei & Yang, Feng, 2020. "Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Milan Andrejić, 2023. "Modeling Retail Supply Chain Efficiency: Exploration and Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Li, Feng & Zhang, Danlu & Zhang, Jinyu & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Measuring the energy production and utilization efficiency of Chinese thermal power industry with the fixed-sum carbon emission constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    11. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.
    12. Xiang Ji & Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Jiasen Sun, 2019. "Using a hybrid heterogeneous DEA method to benchmark China’s sustainable urbanization: an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 281-335, July.
    13. Xiaohong Liu & Feng Yang & Jie Wu, 2020. "DEA considering technological heterogeneity and intermediate output target setting: the performance analysis of Chinese commercial banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 605-626, August.
    14. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Chen, Xiafei & Liu, Zhiying & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Reprint of "Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process :Analysis based on the innovation value chain"," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    16. Wang, Ya & Pan, Jiao-feng & Pei, Rui-min & Yi, Bo-Wen & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Galagedera, Don U.A., 2019. "Modelling social responsibility in mutual fund performance appraisal: A two-stage data envelopment analysis model with non-discretionary first stage output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 376-389.
    18. Halkos, George & Argyropoulou, Georgia, 2024. "Use of indexes in evaluating environmental and health efficiency," MPRA Paper 119800, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Chen, Xiafei & Liu, Zhiying & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2018. "Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 42-53.
    20. Yalei Fei & Gongbing Bi & Wen Song & Yan Luo, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Two-Stage Production Process in the Presence of Undesirable Outputs," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 1343-1358, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:660-680:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.