IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16351-d1289012.html

Incorporating Elicited Preferences for Equality into Electricity System Planning Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Van-Hein Sackey

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • Destenie Nock

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
    Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • Christine Cao

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • Daniel Armanios

    (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AZ, UK)

  • Alex Davis

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goal 7 of the United Nations is to achieve universal access to clean, modern and affordable electricity by 2030. However, 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) currently do not have access to electricity. As a result of this energy inequality, countries in SSA need to plan electricity systems that provide access in an equitable manner. The research question we explore in this paper is how integrating elicited preferences for equality into an electricity system planning model affects investment decisions regarding technology deployment. Our novel contribution is proposing a framework in the form of a discrete choice experiment and a statistical estimation model to determine decision makers’ preferences for equality. In our study, we find that higher preferences for equality result in an increased deployment of solar diesel mini-grids. These hybrid mini-grids, in turn, drive the carbon emissions intensity of the electricity system fourfold. As such, there is a need for stakeholders in Africa’s energy sector to consider the potential divergence between a carbon-minimizing electrification strategy and equitable electrification.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Van-Hein Sackey & Destenie Nock & Christine Cao & Daniel Armanios & Alex Davis, 2023. "Incorporating Elicited Preferences for Equality into Electricity System Planning Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16351-:d:1289012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Kamas & Anne Preston & Sandy Baum, 2008. "Altruism in individual and joint-giving decisions: What's gender got to do with it?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 23-50.
    2. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. James Andreoni & Lise Vesterlund, 2001. "Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 293-312.
    4. Helgeson, Jennifer & Dietz, Simon & Atkinson, Giles D. & Hepburn, Cameron & Sælen, Håkon, 2009. "Siblings, not triplets: social preferences for risk, inequality and time in discounting climate change," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 3, pages 1-28.
    5. repec:aen:journl:ej41-3-falchetta is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Trotter, Philipp A. & Cooper, Nathanial J. & Wilson, Peter R., 2019. "A multi-criteria, long-term energy planning optimisation model with integrated on-grid and off-grid electrification – The case of Uganda," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 288-312.
    7. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Capraro, Valerio & Rascón-Ramírez, Ericka, 2018. "Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 19-23.
    8. Simon Dietz & Giles Atkinson, 2010. "The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 86(3).
    9. Falchetta, Giacomo & Stevanato, Nicolò & Moner-Girona, Magda & Mazzoni, Davide & Colombo, Emanuela & Hafner, Manfred, "undated". "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," FEP: Future Energy Program 305213, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FEP: Future Energy Program.
    10. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goforth, Teagan & Levin, Todd & Nock, Destenie, 2025. "Incorporating energy justice and equity objectives in power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Van-Hein Sackey & Christine Cao & Destenie Nock & Daniel Armanios & Alex Davis, 2025. "Infrastructure Decision Preferences and the Influence of Social Justice Education," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 48-62, September.
    2. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Jung, Dain & Kwak, Do Won & Tang, Kam Ki & Yazbeck, Myra, 2025. "Shared lives, shared stress: Witnessing and spillover effects in spousal mental health interactions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Iván Barreda-Tarrazona & Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutiérrez & Marina Pavan & Gerardo Sabater-Grande, 2025. "Gender differences in dictator giving: A high-power laboratory test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Daniela Di Cagno & Arianna Galliera & Werner Güth & Luca Panaccione, 2018. "Gender Differences in Yielding to Social Influence: An Impunity Experiment," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Valerio Capraro, 2018. "Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(4), pages 345-355, July.
    8. Ren, Weihang & Guan, Yongpei & Qiu, Feng & Levin, Todd & Heleno, Miguel, 2025. "Energy justice and equity: A Review of definitions, measures, and practice in policy, planning, and operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Fleurbaey, Marc & Zuber, Stéphane, 2025. "Universal social welfare orderings and risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Brady, Michael P. & Chouinard, Hayley H. & Wandschneider, Philip R., "undated". "Me, the Poor or the Environment: Evaluating the Relative Strength of Social and Environmental Preferences," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258548, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Kerstin Grosch & Stephan Müller & Holger A. Rau & Lilia Wasserka-Zhurakhovska, 2020. "Gender Differences in Dishonesty Disappear When Leaders Make Decisions on Behalf of Their Team," CESifo Working Paper Series 8514, CESifo.
    12. Bernd Frick & Clarissa Laura Maria Spiess Bru & Daniel Kaimann, 2023. "Are Women (Really) More Lenient? Gender Differences in Expert Evaluations," Working Papers Dissertations 106, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    13. Chowdhury, Subhasish M. & Jeon, Joo Young & Saha, Bibhas, 2023. "Eye-image as nonverbal social cue has asymmetric gender effects in dictator taking games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Huang, Luling & Nock, Destenie, 2024. "Estimating the income-related inequality aversion to energy limiting behavior in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Steven R. Beckman & Gregory DeAngelo & W. James Smith & Ning Wang, 2016. "Is social choice gender-neutral? Reference dependence and sexual selection in decisions toward risk and inequality," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 191-211, June.
    16. Yazıcı, Gözde & Ekin Karasan, Oya & Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Stoner, Rob, 2025. "Mathematical programming models for multistage rural electrification planning: Off-grid, grid and mini-grid options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    17. Bernd Frick, 2025. "Gender Differences in the Concentration of Individual Performance: Evidence From Track and Field Athletics," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 35-54, January.
    18. Miqdad Asaria & Joan Costa-Font & Frank Cowell, 2023. "How does exposure to COVID-19 influence health and income inequality aversion?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 625-647, October.
    19. Umer, Hamza, 2020. "Revisiting generosity in the dictator game: Experimental evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16351-:d:1289012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.