IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13618-d1238137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer-to-Peer Lending as a Determinant of Federal Housing Administration-Insured Mortgages to Meet Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelia Avgeri

    (Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli and Dimitriou St., 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Maria Psillaki

    (Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli and Dimitriou St., 18534 Piraeus, Greece
    Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Economics, Business and Computer Science, Neapolis University Pafos, Paphos 8042, Cyprus)

  • Evanthia Zervoudi

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Hellenic Meditarenean University, 71410 Heraclion, Greece)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the influential factors of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage loans, focusing our research interest on peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, the most successful FinTech lending model. We consider P2P lending an alternative source of financing that marginal borrowers use to pay the increased mortgage down payment, making them eligible to receive a mortgage from conventional banks. In other words, we examine whether and to what extent P2P lending has a positive impact on the FHA loans volume by providing the ability to circumvent the loan-to-value (LTV) cap policy. As a result, P2P lending can be seen as a means for ”rationed” borrowers to have access to the market by reducing inequalities and promoting financial inclusion, thus achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We employ hand-collected data from FHA mortgages, P2P loans, and other economic factors from all 50 U.S. states during 2007–2017 and use panel data techniques for this purpose. Research shows that P2P lending, GDP per capita, population growth, broad money growth rate, interest rate, unemployment rate, new housing units, and consumer confidence Index produce effects on FHA loans. We show that P2P lending, a nonconventional determinant, is causally associated with a significant increase in the count and volume of FHA loans, implying that P2P lending has a positive impact on them. The ability of P2P to bypass mortgage supply constraints (tightened LTV caps) by providing small loans to borrowers to meet the increased down payment requirements is very important to policy-makers, as it shows that constraining the volume of mortgage loans may be not achieved. Macroprudential tools designed to control credit growth may prove ineffective, as the use of alternative forms of lending helps circumvent them and ultimately leads to excessive household leverage with all the risks that it poses to the financial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelia Avgeri & Maria Psillaki & Evanthia Zervoudi, 2023. "Peer-to-Peer Lending as a Determinant of Federal Housing Administration-Insured Mortgages to Meet Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13618-:d:1238137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin A. Park, 2017. "Temporary Loan Limits as a Natural Experiment in Federal Housing Administration Insurance," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 449-466, May.
    2. Kuttner, Kenneth N. & Shim, Ilhyock, 2016. "Can non-interest rate policies stabilize housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 31-44.
    3. Andreas Fuster & Matthew Plosser & Philipp Schnabl & James Vickery, 2019. "The Role of Technology in Mortgage Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1854-1899.
    4. Bengt Holmstrom & Jean Tirole, 1997. "Financial Intermediation, Loanable Funds, and The Real Sector," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(3), pages 663-691.
    5. Morgan, Peter J. & Regis, Paulo José & Salike, Nimesh, 2019. "LTV policy as a macroprudential tool and its effects on residential mortgage loans," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 89-103.
    6. Jagtiani, Julapa & Lemieux, Catharine, 2018. "Do fintech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 43-54.
    7. Gabriel Jiménez & Steven Ongena & José-Luis Peydró & Jesús Saurina, 2017. "Macroprudential Policy, Countercyclical Bank Capital Buffers, and Credit Supply: Evidence from the Spanish Dynamic Provisioning Experiments," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(6), pages 2126-2177.
    8. Cerutti, Eugenio & Claessens, Stijn & Laeven, Luc, 2017. "The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 203-224.
    9. Ranoua Bouchouicha, 2012. "Linkages between real estate markets and the macroeconomy: A dynamic coherence framework," Post-Print halshs-00697157, HAL.
    10. Bouchouicha, Ranoua & Ftiti, Zied, 2012. "Real estate markets and the macroeconomy: A dynamic coherence framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1820-1829.
    11. Buchak, Greg & Matvos, Gregor & Piskorski, Tomasz & Seru, Amit, 2018. "Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 453-483.
    12. Huan Tang, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1900-1938.
    13. Marco Di Maggio & Vincent Yao, 2021. "Fintech Borrowers: Lax Screening or Cream-Skimming?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(10), pages 4565-4618.
    14. Claessens, Stijn & Ghosh, Swati R. & Mihet, Roxana, 2013. "Macro-prudential policies to mitigate financial system vulnerabilities," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 153-185.
    15. Anthony A Defusco & Stephanie Johnson & John Mondragon, 2020. "Regulating Household Leverage," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(2), pages 914-958.
    16. Mr. Bin Wang & Tao Sun, 2013. "How Effective are Macroprudential Policies in China?," IMF Working Papers 2013/075, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Benjamin Born & Jörg Breitung, 2016. "Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 1290-1316, August.
    18. Francesco D’Acunto & Alberto G Rossi, 2022. "Regressive Mortgage Credit Redistribution in the Post-Crisis Era," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 482-525.
    19. D Dulani Jayasuriya & Mohamed Ayaz & Michael Williams, 2023. "The use of digital footprints in the US mortgage market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 353-401, March.
    20. Mankiw, N. Gregory & Weil, David N., 1989. "The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 235-258, May.
    21. Forster, Robert & Sun, Xiaojin, 2022. "Taming the housing crisis: An LTV macroprudential policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    22. Andrija Đurović, 2017. "Estimating Probability of Default on Peer to Peer Market – Survival Analysis Approach," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 6(2), pages 149-167.
    23. Kim Hiang Liow & Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim & Qiong Huang, 2006. "Macroeconomic risk influences on the property stock market," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 295-323, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ms. Juliana Dutra Araujo & Manasa Patnam & Ms. Adina Popescu & Mr. Fabian Valencia & Weijia Yao, 2020. "Effects of Macroprudential Policy: Evidence from Over 6,000 Estimates," IMF Working Papers 2020/067, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Kang, Qiaoling & Wu, Ji & Chen, Minghua & Jeon, Bang Nam, 2021. "Do macroprudential policies affect the bank financing of firms in China? Evidence from a quantile regression approach," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Simona Malovana & Martin Hodula & Zuzana Gric & Josef Bajzik, 2022. "Borrower-Based Macroprudential Measures and Credit Growth: How Biased is the Existing Literature?," Working Papers 2022/8, Czech National Bank.
    4. Knut Are Aastveit & Ragnar Enger Juelsrud & Ella Getz Wold, 2021. "The household effects of mortgage regulation," Working Papers No 07/2021, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    5. Mokas, Dimitris & Giuliodori, Massimo, 2023. "Effects of LTV announcements in EU economies," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Jelisaveta Lazarevic & Tanja Kuzman & Milan Nedeljkovic, 2022. "Credit cycles and macroprudential policies in emerging market economies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 633-666, September.
    7. Jacek Adamek & Ma³gorzata Solarz, 2023. "Adoption factors in digital lending services offered by FinTech lenders," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 169-212, March.
    8. Krzysztof Waliszewski & Ewa Cichowicz & £ukasz Gêbski & Filip Kliber & Jakub Kubiczek & Pawe³ Niedzió³ka & Ma³gorzata Solarz & Anna Warchlewska, 2023. "The role of the Lendtech sector in the consumer credit market in the context of household financial exclusion," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 609-643, June.
    9. Croux, Christophe & Jagtiani, Julapa & Korivi, Tarunsai & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "Important factors determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 270-296.
    10. Malovaná, Simona & Hodula, Martin & Gric, Zuzana & Bajzík, Josef, 2023. "Macroprudential policy in central banks: Integrated or separate? Survey among academics and central bankers," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Hodula, Martin & Melecký, Martin & Pfeifer, Lukáš & Szabo, Milan, 2023. "Cooling the mortgage loan market: The effect of borrower-based limits on new mortgage lending," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Chen, S. & Doerr, S. & Frost, J. & Gambacorta, L. & Shin, H.S., 2023. "The fintech gender gap," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Yavuz Arslan and Christian Upper, 2017. "Macroprudential frameworks: implementation and effectiveness," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Macroprudential frameworks, implementation and relationship with other policies, volume 94, pages 25-47, Bank for International Settlements.
    15. Claudia M Buch & Linda S Goldberg, 2017. "Cross-Border Prudential Policy Spillovers: How Much? How Important? Evidence from the International Banking Research Network," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 13(2), pages 505-558, March.
    16. Dimitris Mokas & Massimo Giuliodori, 2021. "Effects of LTV announcements in EU economies," Working Papers 704, DNB.
    17. Lilit Popoyan, 2020. "Macroprudential Policy: a Blessing or a Curse?," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 11(1-2).
    18. Paul Beaumont & Huan Tang & Éric Vansteenberghe, 2024. "Collateral Effects: The Role of FinTech in Small Business Lending [Effets collatéraux : le rôle des Fintechs dans le financement des petites et moyennes entreprises]," Débats économiques et financiers 42, Banque de France.
    19. Viral V. Acharya & Katharina Bergant & Matteo Crosignani & Tim Eisert & Fergal Mccann, 2022. "The Anatomy of the Transmission of Macroprudential Policies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2533-2575, October.
    20. Neanidis, Kyriakos C., 2019. "Volatile capital flows and economic growth: The role of banking supervision," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 77-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13618-:d:1238137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.