IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7430-d841335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protected Cultivation of Horticultural Crops as a Livelihood Opportunity in Western India: An Economic Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Prakash Pachiyappan

    (ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram 695017, Kerala, India)

  • Pramod Kumar

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Krishna Viswanatha Reddy

    (ICAR-Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry 533105, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Kotamraju N. Ravi Kumar

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, ANGRAU, Bapatla 522034, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Srinivasa Konduru

    (Department of Agri-Business, University of California, Fresno, CA 93740, USA)

  • Venkatesh Paramesh

    (ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Goa Velha 403402, Goa, India)

  • Gandhamanagenahalli A. Rajanna

    (ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh 362001, Gujarat, India)

  • Shashidhar K. Shankarappa

    (Unit of Livestock Farm Complex, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Rajeev Gandhi South Campus, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Duraisamy Jaganathan

    (ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram 695017, Kerala, India)

  • Sheela Immanuel

    (ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram 695017, Kerala, India)

  • Ankush L. Kamble

    (ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400061, Maharashtra, India)

  • Raman Selvakumar

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Kingsly T. Immanuelraj

    (ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Boopathy Raja Manogaran

    (Department of Livestock Production Management, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai 600051, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Anbukani Perumal

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Umamageswari Maruthanayagam

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, Karaikal 609603, Puducherry, India)

  • Sivalingam Niranjan

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

Protected cultivation is an innovative way of raising seasonal and off-seasonal crops under a controlled environment. Vegetables and flower crops have tremendous potential to augment productivity, generate employment, utilize land efficiently and enhance export. This study was undertaken to assess the economic feasibility of protected cultivation in the high export potential zones of the Pune and Nasik districts of Maharashtra, India, by employing project analytical tools and the regression model. The results revealed that the cultivation of flowers and vegetables under protected cultivation was highly lucrative with high investment. The protected cultivation of rose and capsicum had higher cultivation cost (300%), gross return (250%) and net return (190%) as compared to open cultivation. Moreover, most of the crops grown in polyhouses are highly profitable at different discount rates (7%, 10% and 12%), whereas a few crops were rewarding under shade net condition with subsidies. Factors such as literacy ( p < 0.05), income ( p < 0.05), access to subsidy ( p < 0.05) and the risk orientation index ( p < 0.01) were found statistically significant in technology adoption. In the context of a changing climate and shrinking land resources, water scarcity, incidence of pests and diseases, an ever-increasing population, low productivity under open conditions and changes in consumer’s preference are the drivers for switching over to protected cultivation. In the recent past, protected cultivation has been gaining importance in different parts of the country, including Maharashtra. The policy implications are creating modern infrastructure, enhanced application of ICTs, maximum crop production with minimum utilization of land and institutional support to promote technology on a commercial scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Prakash Pachiyappan & Pramod Kumar & Krishna Viswanatha Reddy & Kotamraju N. Ravi Kumar & Srinivasa Konduru & Venkatesh Paramesh & Gandhamanagenahalli A. Rajanna & Shashidhar K. Shankarappa & Duraisam, 2022. "Protected Cultivation of Horticultural Crops as a Livelihood Opportunity in Western India: An Economic Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7430-:d:841335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vijayasarathy, K. & Ashok, K.R., 2015. "Climate Adaptation in Agriculture through Technological Option: Determinants and Impact on Efficiency of Production," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 28(01).
    2. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    3. Njabulo Lloyd Ntshangase & Brian Muroyiwa & Melusi Sibanda, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Adoption of No-Till Conservation Agriculture by Small-Scale Farmers in Zashuke, KwaZulu-Natal Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Dil Bahadur Rahut & M. L. Jat, 2020. "Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: adaptation options in smallholder production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5045-5075, August.
    5. Viswanatha Reddy Krishna & Venkatesh Paramesh & Vadivel Arunachalam & Bappa Das & Hosam O. Elansary & Arjun Parab & Dendi Damodar Reddy & K. S. Shashidhar & Diaa O. El-Ansary & Eman A. Mahmoud & Moham, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainability and Priorities for Development of Indian West Coast Region: An Application of Sustainable Livelihood Security Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. N. L. Panwar & Surendra Kothari & S. C. Kaushik, 2014. "Cost-benefit and systems analysis of passively ventilated solar greenhouses for food production in arid and semi-arid regions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 160-167, March.
    7. Prakash, P. & Kumar, Pramod, 2016. "Performance of Kisan Credit Card Scheme in Tamil Nadu," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 71(2), June.
    8. Bista, Diwas Raj & Kumar, Pramod & Mathur, V.C., 2012. "Progress and Performance of Kisan Credit Card Scheme with a Case Study of Bihar," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 25(01), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leslie T. Ubaub & Mohammed A. Kader & Nandakumar Desai & Oliver C. C. Ubaub & Mayday Cai, 2025. "Protected Cultivation with Drip Fertigation Is a Feasible Option for Growing High-Value Vegetables in Samoa: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Chitra Shukla & Debaditya Gupta & Balbir Kumar Pandey & S. R. Bhakar, 2024. "Suitability assessment of different cladding materials for growing bell pepper under protected cultivation structures using multi-criteria decision-making technique," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3713-3733, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tesei, Andrea & Ponticelli, Jacopo & Gupta, Apoorv, 2019. "Technology Adoption and Access to Credit via Mobile Phones," CEPR Discussion Papers 13956, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Ruzzante, Sacha & Labarta, Ricardo & Bilton, Amy, 2021. "Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Yari Vecchio & Marcello De Rosa & Gregorio Pauselli & Margherita Masi & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The leading role of perception: the FACOPA model to comprehend innovation adoption," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Welcome Ntokozo Sifisosami Zondo & Jorine Tafadzwa Ndoro, 2023. "Attributes of Diffusion of Innovation’s Influence on Smallholder Farmers’ Social Media Adoption in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Faruque As Sunny & Linlin Fu & Md Sadique Rahman & Zuhui Huang, 2022. "Determinants and Impact of Solar Irrigation Facility (SIF) Adoption: A Case Study in Northern Bangladesh," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Mianseli Elisabeth Tankoano & Martin Sawadogo, 2022. "Farmers' perceptions and adoption of agroecological practices in the Central-North region of Burkina Faso [Perceptions des agriculteurs et adoption des pratiques agroécologiques dans la région du C," Post-Print hal-03939540, HAL.
    7. Faruque-As-Sunny & Zuhui Huang & Taonarufaro Tinaye Pemberai Karimanzira, 2018. "Investigating Key Factors Influencing Farming Decisions Based on Soil Testing and Fertilizer Recommendation Facilities (STFRF)—A Case Study on Rural Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Bola Amoke Awotide & Adebayo Ogunniyi & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju & Lateef Olalekan Bello & Amadou Youssouf Coulibaly & Alexander Nimo Wiredu & Bourémo Kone & Aly Ahamadou & Victor Manyong & Tahirou Ab, 2022. "Evaluating the Heterogeneous Impacts of Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Technologies on Rural Households’ Welfare in Mali," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Ouma, James Okuro & De Groote, Hugo & Owuor, George, 2006. "Determinants of Improved Maize Seed and Fertilizer Use in Kenya: Policy Implications," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25433, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Alexander, Corinne E., 2002. "The Role Of Seed Company Supplied Information In Farmers' Decisions," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19617, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    12. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    13. Cuong Le Van & Nguyen To The, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of organic production," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 33-59, February.
    14. Gedikoglu, Haluk & McCann, Laura M.J. & Artz, Georgeanne M., 2011. "Off-Farm Employment Effects on Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Vera Castillo, Y.B. & Pritchard, H.W. & Frija, A. & Chellattan Veettil, P. & Cuevas Sanchez, J.A. & Van Damme, P. & Van Huylenbroeck, G., 2014. "Production viability and farmers’ willingness to adopt Jatropha curcas L. as a biofuel source in traditional agroecosystems in Totonacapan, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 42-49.
    16. Anjani Kumar & Ashok K. Mishra & Sunil Saroj & Vinay K. Sonkar & Ganesh Thapa & Pramod K. Joshi, 2020. "Food safety measures and food security of smallholder dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Bihar, India," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 363-384, June.
    17. Smale, Melinda & Assima, Amidou & Kergna, Alpha & Thériault, Veronique & Weltzien, Eva, "undated". "Farm Family Effects Of Improved Sorghum Varieties In Mali: A Multivalued Treatment Approach," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259076, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    18. Michael J. Andrews, 2020. "Local Effects of Land Grant Colleges on Agricultural Innovation and Output," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture, pages 139-175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Ogada, Maurice Juma, 2012. "Forest Management Decentralization in Kenya: Effects on Household Farm Forestry Decisions in Kakamega," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126319, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Kim, Seon-Ae & Westra, John V. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2006. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Russian Varroa-Resistant Honey Bees," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35311, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7430-:d:841335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.