IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2341-d333520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Sharing Platforms: An Empirical Study of the Factors Affecting Continued Use Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Shichao Pang

    (Electronic Commerce, Kongju National University, Kongju 32588, Korea)

  • Peng Bao

    (Electronic Commerce, Kongju National University, Kongju 32588, Korea)

  • Wenyuan Hao

    (Computer Science & Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea)

  • Jaewoong Kim

    (Computer Science & Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea)

  • Wei Gu

    (Electronic Commerce, Kongju National University, Kongju 32588, Korea)

Abstract

Under the background of the constant development of sharing economy and constant upgrade of Internet technologies, various knowledge sharing platforms have emerged in recent years. As a new form for sharing economy, knowledge sharing platforms have made great strides, thus, providing new channels of knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and individual knowledge storage for users. Nevertheless, knowledge sharing platforms are still faced with problems, such as uneven product quality (Content quality) and poor user experience. Therefore, how to maintain consumers’ continued use intention without impairing consumer satisfaction has obviously become an issue of great concern on the development path of knowledge sharing platforms. Based on the expectation confirmation theory (ECT) and information system (IS) success model, and integrating major characteristics of knowledge sharing platforms, the conceptual models and hypotheses influencing consumers’ continued use intention of knowledge sharing platforms are built to study primary factors affecting consumers’ continued use intention. Through online and offline questionnaires, 428 copies were collected online, and 150 copies were collected offline, with a total of 578 copies recovered. We deleted some questionnaires with untrue and contradictory answers, because these interviewees might not have carefully read. A questionnaire is conducted with 512 valid copies collected from respondents. At the same time, the structural equation model (SEM) is used to verify and analyze hypotheses. Results show that various variables have a direct or indirect influence on consumers’ continued our intention. Meanwhile, it is observed that perceived usefulness and satisfaction degree have a significant influence on continued use intention of knowledge sharing platforms. The higher the satisfaction degree is, the more likely the consumers will continue using knowledge sharing platforms. The expectation confirmation degree exerts an indirect influence on consumers’ continued use intention of knowledge sharing platforms via perceived usefulness. The IS success model can also significantly influence consumers’ satisfaction degree of knowledge sharing platforms. Additionally, perceived usefulness is observed to have the strongest influence on consumers’ continued use intention of knowledge sharing platforms. According to the above research findings, knowledge sharing platforms should strengthen their content quality control, ensure the consistency between service quality and payment, and improve the platform quality. To sum up, this research can provide theoretical bases for sustainable development and follow-up research of the knowledge sharing platform industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Shichao Pang & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim & Wei Gu, 2020. "Knowledge Sharing Platforms: An Empirical Study of the Factors Affecting Continued Use Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2341-:d:333520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Zhang & Shan Jiang & Yuting Xiao & Yihang Cheng, 2018. "Global challenges and developmental lessons in the knowledge sharing economy," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 167-171, July.
    2. Efraim Turban & Jon Outland & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2018. "Electronic Commerce 2018," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 9, number 978-3-319-58715-8, August.
    3. Amedeo Maizza & Monica Fait & Paola Scorrano & Antonio Iazzi, 2019. "How Knowledge Sharing Culture Can Become a Facilitator of the Sustainable Development in the Agrifood Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Nascimento, Bruno & Oliveira, Tiago & Tam, Carlos, 2018. "Wearable technology: What explains continuance intention in smartwatches?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 157-169.
    5. Efraim Turban & Jon Outland & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2018. "Innovative EC Systems: From E-Government to E-Learning, E-Health, Sharing Economy, and P2P Commerce," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Electronic Commerce 2018, edition 9, chapter 5, pages 167-201, Springer.
    6. Chen, Ching-Fu, 2008. "Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: Evidence from Taiwan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 709-717, May.
    7. Jonathon N. Cummings, 2004. "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 352-364, March.
    8. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    9. DeLone, William H. & McLean, Ephraim R., 2016. "Information Systems Success Measurement," Foundations and Trends(R) in Information Systems, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 1-116, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hari Tri Wibowo, 2020. "The effect of e-local tax return usage towards local tax compliance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Master in Accounting Program, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, vol. 2(2), pages 81-96, May.
    2. Hong Liu & Zhihua Liu & Yongzeng Lai & Lin Li, 2021. "Factors Influencing Collaborative Innovation Project Performance: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Luiela Magdalena Csorba & Florin-Lucian Isac & Sergiu Rusu, 2023. "Managing Sustainable Sharing Economy Platforms: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Based Structural Equation Modelling on an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Xin Huang & Hui Zhi, 2023. "Factors Influencing Students’ Continuance Usage Intention with Virtual Classroom during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2020. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-5, July.
    6. Na Yu & Yi-Ting Huang, 2020. "Important Factors Affecting User Experience Design and Satisfaction of a Mobile Health App—A Case Study of Daily Yoga App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Nancyprabha Pushparaj & V. J. Sivakumar & Manoraj Natarajan & A. Bhuvaneskumar, 2023. "Two decades of DeLone and Mclean IS success model: a scientometrics analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2469-2491, June.
    8. Run-Ze Wu & Xiu-Fu Tian, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Critical Factors on Continuous Usage Intention towards Enterprise Social Networks: An Integrated Model of IS Success and TTF," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Xiu-Fu Tian & Run-Ze Wu, 2022. "Determinants of the Mobile Health Continuance Intention of Elders with Chronic Diseases: An Integrated Framework of ECM-ISC and UTAUT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. repec:eur:ejnmjr:70 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Vincenzo Corvello & Maria Cristina Chimenti & Carlo Giglio & Saverino Verteramo, 2020. "An Investigation on the Use by Academic Researchers of Knowledge from Scientific Social Networking Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Yiwen Li & Norihiro Nishimura & Hisanori Yagami & Hye-Sook Park, 2021. "An Empirical Study on Online Learners’ Continuance Intentions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinmin Kim & Jaeyoung Kim, 2021. "An Integrated Analysis of Value-Based Adoption Model and Information Systems Success Model for PropTech Service Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Lin Li & Kyung Young Lee & Emmanuel Emokpae & Sung-Byung Yang, 2021. "What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 575-599, September.
    3. Stephanie Schwipper & Severine Peche & Gertrud Schmitz, 2020. "Mobile Location-Based Services’ Value-in-Use in Inner Cities: Do a Customer’s Shopping Patterns, Prior User Experience, and Sales Promotions Matter?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 511-564, October.
    4. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Tran, Phuong Thi Kim & Le, Diem-Trinh Thi & Johnson, Lester W., 2020. "Factors influencing customer's loyalty towards ride-hailing taxi services – A case study of Vietnam," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 96-112.
    5. S Michel & A Michaud-Trévinal & F Cocula, 2019. "Net Impacts in Front Office IS: a First Operationalization of Delone and McLean Model in the Banking Sector," Post-Print hal-02467423, HAL.
    6. Xin Huang & Hui Zhi, 2023. "Factors Influencing Students’ Continuance Usage Intention with Virtual Classroom during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Arfan Shahzad & Rohail Hassan & Adejare Yusuff Aremu & Arsalan Hussain & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 805-826, June.
    8. Iannacci, Federico & Cornford, Tony, 2017. "Unravelling casual and temporal influences underpinning monitoring systems success: a typological approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84049, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Salah Jadda & Nawfal Acha & Hafid Barka, 2021. "Performance of Information Systems of Public Organizations: An exploratory study [Performance des Systèmes d'Information des Organisations Publiques : Une étude exploratoir]," Post-Print hal-03712274, HAL.
    10. Dalal Bamufleh & Amani Saud Alshamari & Asrar Saud Alsobhi & Hanan Hisham Ezzi & Waad Sultan Alruhaili, 2021. "Exploring Public Attitudes toward E-Government Health Applications Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1, August.
    11. Dung Minh Nguyen & Yen-Ting Helena Chiu & Huy Duc Le, 2021. "Determinants of Continuance Intention towards Banks’ Chatbot Services in Vietnam: A Necessity for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Hamood Mohd. Al-Hattami, 2021. "Validation of the D&M IS success model in the context of accounting information system of the banking sector in the least developed countries," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 127-153, March.
    13. Chia-Lee Yang & Ming-Chang Shieh & Chi-Yo Huang & Ching-Pin Tung, 2018. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Successful Integration of Corporate Volunteers into Public Flood Disaster Inquiry and Notification Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-31, June.
    14. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    16. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    17. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    18. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    19. Manuel E. Sosa & Steven D. Eppinger & Craig M. Rowles, 2004. "The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1674-1689, December.
    20. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2341-:d:333520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.