IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9060-d1769980.html

Digital Learning Empowering Sustainable Education: Evidence from the Determinants of Chinese College Students’ Knowledge Innovation Capability

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Huang

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Zhihui Zhang

    (School of Marxism, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Bingqian Xu

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Xinyu Zhou

    (School of Marxism, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Jiayu Zhai

    (School of Marxism, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Da Gao

    (School of Law and Business School, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technology, the role of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) applications within digital learning communities has become increasingly significant. Enhancing the level of knowledge innovation through the integration of human and artificial intelligence has emerged as a critical issue. Grounded in social cognitive theory, this study utilizes a sample of 407 Super Star Learn community learners as a case study. It applies the Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method to investigate the synergistic effects of technological environment, cultural context, and individual cognitive factors in promoting learners’ knowledge innovation capabilities. The results show the following: (1) No single condition constitutes a prerequisite for learners to achieve high-level knowledge innovation when acting in isolation. However, enhancing technical capabilities has a relatively universal impact on promoting learners to achieve these results. (2) The multiple concurrency of the technological environment, cultural environment, and individual cognitive conditions has generated multiple configuration patterns that promote knowledge innovation, indicating that the paths leading to learners’ high-level innovation exhibit the characteristic of numerous concurrency. Therefore, it is suggested that digital learning communities actively explore new paths for sustainable knowledge innovation and development driven by generative artificial intelligence technology, thereby injecting sustainable impetus into the development and innovation process of learners, contributing to the goals of sustainable education.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Huang & Zhihui Zhang & Bingqian Xu & Xinyu Zhou & Jiayu Zhai & Da Gao, 2025. "Digital Learning Empowering Sustainable Education: Evidence from the Determinants of Chinese College Students’ Knowledge Innovation Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9060-:d:1769980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9060/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9060/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beynon, Malcolm & Pickernell, David & Battisti, Martina & Jones, Paul, 2024. "A panel fsQCA investigation on European regional innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Víctor Yepes & Salvador López, 2023. "The Knowledge Sharing Capability in Innovative Behavior: A SEM Approach from Graduate Students’ Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Mohamamd Alamgir Hossain & Mohammed Quaddus & Md Moazzem Hossain & Gopika Gopakumar, 2024. "Data-driven innovation development: an empirical analysis of the antecedents using PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 895-937, February.
    4. Shichao Pang & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim & Wei Gu, 2020. "Knowledge Sharing Platforms: An Empirical Study of the Factors Affecting Continued Use Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Majid Zamiri & Ali Esmaeili, 2024. "Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    6. Helena Yli‐Renko & Erkko Autio & Harry J. Sapienza, 2001. "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 587-613, June.
    7. Yan Huang & Yang Feng & Da Gao & Jiawen Wei & Kai Wu, 2025. "The Power of Knowledge: How Can Educational Competitiveness Improve Urban Energy Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    2. Shao, Yan & Sun, Lingxia, 2021. "Entrepreneurs’ social capital and venture capital financing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 499-512.
    3. Tommaso Pucci & Mara Brumana & Tommaso Minola & Lorenzo Zanni, 2020. "Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 205-227, February.
    4. Valérie François & Christophe Lafaye & Matthieu Belarouci, 2021. "The role of social capital in the growth of innovative nascent firms: the moderating effect of incubators," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(4/5), pages 326-345.
    5. Junfu Zhang, 2011. "The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 187-208, February.
    6. George A Shinkle & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2019. "Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 248-281, May.
    7. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.
    8. Changbyung Yoon & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon & Omar Toulan, 2017. "Typology and Success Factors of Collaboration for Sustainable Growth in the IT Service Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    9. repec:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:450-458 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    11. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    12. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Stephen X., 2024. "Too much of two good things: The curvilinear effects of self-efficacy and market validation in new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Maria Rumyantseva & Catherine Welch, 2023. "The born global and international new venture revisited: An alternative explanation for early and rapid internationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(7), pages 1193-1221, September.
    14. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Luis Enrique Valdez-Juárez & José Luis Lizcano-Álvarez, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital: Sources of Competitiveness and Legitimacy in Organizations’ Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Ortiz García Navas, Beatriz & Donate Manzanares, Mario Javier & Guadamillas Gómez, Fátima, 2019. "Social capital as a theoretical approach in Strategic Management," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    16. Nguyen ThiThuy Van & Le Ba Phong & Luu Thi Loan, 2018. "Antecedents of Innovation Capability: The Role of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Learning," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, September.
    17. Chengguang Li & Rodrigo Isidor & Luis Alfonso Dau & Rudy Kabst, 2018. "The More the Merrier? Immigrant Share and Entrepreneurial Activities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(5), pages 698-733, September.
    18. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    19. D’Angelo, Alfredo & Presutti, Manuela, 2019. "SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 613-624.
    20. Gao, Junzhe & Opute, Abdullah Promise & Jawad, Caroline & Zhan, Meng, 2025. "The influence of artificial intelligence chatbot problem solving on customers’ continued usage intention in e-commerce platforms: an expectation-confirmation model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    21. Laamanen, Tomi, 2005. "Dependency, resource depth, and supplier performance during industry downturn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-140, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9060-:d:1769980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.