IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i5p130-d916467.html

Each Person as an End? The Users’ Choices in the Service Delivery Process for Assistive Technology in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Nóra Menich

    (Centre for Social Sciences, 4. Tóth Kálmán str, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
    Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Social Sciences, 1/A Pázmány Péter s., H-1117 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Based on notions from the Capability Approach, this study investigates the service delivery process for assistive technology in Hungary. The research aimed to explore whether the service delivery is person-centered, with a specific focus on the users’ possible choices. In addition to a comprehensive analysis of legislative and policy documents, qualitative data were collected in semi-structured interviews with users and professionals ( n = 31) to gain a deeper understanding of personal experiences. Our findings indicate that the service delivery system is product-centered and dominated by financial considerations. The policy and legislation framework does not provide an institutional guarantee for users to be able to have their voices heard; the extent to which their opinions and preferences prevail depends on the attitude, knowledge, and goodwill of the professionals involved in the process. The realization of a person-centered approach will be hindered as long as the users’ needs are viewed from a medical point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Nóra Menich, 2022. "Each Person as an End? The Users’ Choices in the Service Delivery Process for Assistive Technology in Hungary," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:130-:d:916467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/5/130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily J Steel, 2019. "The Duplicity of Choice and Empowerment: Disability Rights Diluted in Australia’s Policies on Assistive Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, May.
    2. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp009 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ricky Buchanan & Natasha Layton, 2019. "Innovation in Assistive Technology: Voice of the User," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Dreze, Jean & Sen, Amartya, 2002. "India: Development and Participation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199257492.
    5. ., 2006. "Capability Approach," Chapters, in: David Alexander Clark (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Development Studies, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Alvaro Díaz Ruiz & Natalia Sánchez Durán & Alexis Palá, 2015. "An Analysis of the Intentions of a Chilean Disability Policy Through the Lens of the Capability Approach," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 483-500, November.
    7. Miriam Teschl & Flavio Comim, 2005. "Adaptive Preferences and Capabilities: Some Preliminary Conceptual Explorations," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(2), pages 229-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natasha Layton & Johan Borg, 2023. "Assistive Technology and the Wellbeing of Societies from a Capabilities Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-3, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gasper, D.R., 2006. "What is the capability approach?: its core, rationale, partners and dangers," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19187, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Gasper, Des, 2007. "What is the capability approach?: Its core, rationale, partners and dangers," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 335-359, June.
    3. Mohamed I. Maalim & Malcolm MacLachlan, 2022. "The Assistive Technology Passport: A Resource for Enhancing Capabilities as a Result of Better Access to Assistive Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Shivani Gupta & Agnes Meershoek & Luc P. de Witte, 2022. "Using the Capability Approach to Review the National Legislative Frameworks for Support Services for Persons with Disabilities in Four Countries in Asia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, December.
    5. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp008 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. John Dagsvik, 2013. "Making Sen’s capability approach operational: a random scale framework," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 75-105, January.
    7. Rauschmayer, Felix & Bauler, Tom & Schäpke, Niko, 2013. "Towards a governance of sustainability transitions: Giving place to individuals," UFZ Discussion Papers 17/2013, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    8. Sripad Motiram & Nayantara Sarma, 2011. "Polarization, inequality and growth: The Indian experience," Working Papers 225, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    9. Malte Dold, 2025. "Endogenous preferences: a challenge to constitutional political economy’s normative foundation?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 424-443, December.
    10. Sripad Motiram & Lars Osberg, 2010. "Gender Inequalities in Tasks and Instruction Opportunities within Indian Families," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 141-167.
    11. Reimeingam, Marchang, 2016. "MGNREGA job sustainability and poverty in Sikkim," Working Papers 374, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    12. Vizard, Polly, 2005. "The contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the field of human rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Kristian Alm & David S. A. Guttormsen, 2023. "Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 303-320, January.
    14. Prabir C. Bhattacharya & Cornilius Chikwama, 2012. "Inequalities in Child Mortality in India: A District-Level Analysis," Heriot-Watt University Economics Discussion Papers 1202, Department of Economics, School of Management and Languages, Heriot Watt University.
    15. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2011. "Entrepreneurship and human development: A capability approach," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 216-224.
    16. Ali, Muhammad Murtaza & Rouis Skandrani, Sana, 2026. "Education and poverty: The case of street-children in urban areas of Pakistan," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Sandhya R. Mahapatro & Renu Choudhary, 2022. "Intergenerational educational and occupational mobility among scheduled castes in rural Bihar," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(1), pages 65-84, June.
    18. repec:kqi:journl:2018-2-1-2 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Sijia Liu & Almas Heshmati, 2023. "Relationship between education and well-being in China," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 25(1), pages 123-151, June.
    20. Gulati, Namrata & Ray, Tridip, 2016. "Inequality, neighbourhoods and welfare of the poor," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 214-228.
    21. Bhaskar Chakrabarti, 2013. "Decentralisation and the Politics of Water Allocation in West Bengal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 8(1), pages 01-26, April.
    22. Cassan, Guilhem, 2019. "Affirmative action, education and gender: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 51-70.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:130-:d:916467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.