IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i20p2608-d657831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Universally Applicable Service Quality Assessment Model Based on the Theory of Consumption Values, and Using Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations to Empirically Test Three Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Tsuen-Ho Hsu

    (Department of Marketing and Distribution Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Dasyue Rd., Yanchao Dist., Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan)

  • Sen-Tien Her

    (College of Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Dasyue Rd., Yanchao Dist., Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan)

  • Jia-Jeng Hou

    (Department of Business Administration, National Chiayi University, No. 580, Xinmin Rd., West Dist., Chiayi City 600, Taiwan)

Abstract

Service quality is an important factor for a successful company. The SERVQUAL model is widely used. However, it has been controversial over the past 30 years. This research aims to develop a service quality measurement model that can be supported in conceptualization and universal applicability, and uses this model to identify the most important key factors of service quality for three industries. First, based on the theory of consumption values, this study used conceptualization and the modified Delphi method to develop a service quality assessment model—the consumption values-based service quality model (CV-SQ). The CV-SQ model was then used in conjunction with the fuzzy linguistic preference relations (Fuzzy LinPreRa) method to address MCDM problems. The findings suggested that the most important key factors of service quality comprised safety in the aviation companies, innovativeness in the travel agencies, and comfort in the hotels. The CV-SQ model can be supported by theoretical and empirical tests in conceptualization and universal applicability, and has made theoretical contributions to service quality management. The research results have provided practical contributions to the improvement of service quality in the three industries. What is more noteworthy is the weight of epistemic value ranked first and second among the three industries, but it had not been included in any service quality aspect classification schemes during the past three or four decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Sen-Tien Her & Jia-Jeng Hou, 2021. "Developing Universally Applicable Service Quality Assessment Model Based on the Theory of Consumption Values, and Using Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations to Empirically Test Three Industries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:20:p:2608-:d:657831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/20/2608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/20/2608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ai-Hsuan Chiang & Silvana Trimi, 2020. "Impacts of service robots on service quality," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(3), pages 439-459, September.
    2. Hong, Seock-Jin & Choi, Dongho & Chae, Junjae, 2020. "Exploring different airport users’ service quality satisfaction between service providers and air travelers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Shiu-Li Huang & Ming-Yen Kuo, 2020. "Critical success factors in the sharing economy: a customer perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 553-576, December.
    4. Tolga, Ethem & Demircan, Murat Levent & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2005. "Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 89-117, July.
    5. Željko Stević & Ilija Tanackov & Adis Puška & Goran Jovanov & Jovica Vasiljević & Darko Lojaničić, 2021. "Development of Modified SERVQUAL–MCDM Model for Quality Determination in Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Li, L. X., 1997. "Relationships between determinants of hospital quality management and service quality performance--a path analytic model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 535-545, October.
    7. Rodríguez, Pablo Gutiérrez & Villarreal, Ricardo & Valiño, Pedro Cuesta & Blozis, Shelley, 2020. "A PLS-SEM approach to understanding E-SQ, E-Satisfaction and E-Loyalty for fashion E-Retailers in Spain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Chiclana, F. & Luque, M., 2004. "Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 98-109, April.
    9. Spiros Gounaris, 2005. "An alternative measure for assessing perceived quality of software house services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 803-823, September.
    10. Malhotra, Neeru & Mavondo, Felix & Mukherjee, Avinandan & Hooley, Graham, 2013. "Service quality of frontline employees: A profile deviation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1338-1344.
    11. Bostancı, Bülent & Erdem, Nuri, 2020. "Investigating the satisfaction of citizens in municipality services using fuzzy modelling," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Wang, Anbang & Chang, Huayi, 2020. "Rural households’ perceived value of energy utilization of crop residues: A case study from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 286-295.
    13. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Lucía Melián-Alzola & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Service quality in blood donation: satisfaction, trust and loyalty," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(1), pages 101-129, March.
    15. Fan Zhang & Yanbing Ju & Ernesto D.R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Aihua Wang & Peiwu Dong & Mihalis Giannakis, 2021. "Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment: A fuzzy heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making approach," Post-Print hal-03320128, HAL.
    16. Mels Gerhard & BOSHOFF CHRIST0 & NEL DEON, 1997. "The Dimensions of Service Quality: The Original European Perspective Revisited," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 173-189, January.
    17. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Gao, Yanan, 2016. "Innovative service satisfaction and customer promotion behaviour in the Chinese budget hotel: an empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 201-210.
    18. Ocampo, Lanndon & Alinsub, Jovir & Casul, Ruselle Anne & Enquig, Germellie & Luar, Mitzi & Panuncillon, Noche & Bongo, Miriam & Ocampo, Christine Omela, 2019. "Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Pandey, Mukesh Mohan, 2016. "Evaluating the service quality of airports in Thailand using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 241-249.
    20. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Jolita Vveinhardt & Dalia Štreimikienė & Muhammad Ashraf & Zahid Ali Channar, 2017. "Modified SERVQUAL model and effects of customer attitude and technology on customer satisfaction in banking industry: mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 974-1004, September.
    21. Seo, Kwanglim & Moon, Joonho & Lee, Seoki, 2015. "Synergy of corporate social responsibility and service quality for airlines: The moderating role of carrier type," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 126-134.
    22. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Das, Manish & Maggioni, Isabella & Sands, Sean & Dharmesti, Maria & Ferraro, Carla, 2021. "Understanding on-the-go consumption: A retail mix perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    23. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    24. Omar, Suha & Mohsen, Kholoud & Tsimonis, Georgios & Oozeerally, Adam & Hsu, Jen-Hsien, 2021. "M-commerce: The nexus between mobile shopping service quality and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    25. Liu, Chih-Hsing Sam & Lee, Tingko, 2016. "Service quality and price perception of service: Influence on word-of-mouth and revisit intention," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 42-54.
    26. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    27. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2021. "The role of customers in the gig economy: how perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 45-75, March.
    28. Boakye, Kwabena G. & Natesan, Prathiba & Prybutok, Victor R., 2020. "A correlated uniqueness model of service quality measurement among users of cloud-based service platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    29. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    30. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    31. Nojavan, Majid & Heidari, Atefeh & Mohammaditabar, Davood, 2021. "A fuzzy service quality based approach for performance evaluation of educational units," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    32. Jia-Wei Tang & Tsuen-Ho Hsu, 2018. "Utilizing the Hierarchy Structural Fuzzy Analytical Network Process Model to Evaluate Critical Elements of Marketing Strategic Alliance Development in Mobile Telecommunication Industry," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-284, April.
    33. Pietro Amenta & Antonio Lucadamo & Antonello D’Ambra, 2021. "Restricted Common Component and Specific Weight Analysis: A Constrained Explorative Approach for the Customer Satisfaction Evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 409-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    2. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Wu, Hanjun & He, Hang & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong, 2023. "Changes in perceptions of airport services’ attributes: An assessment of the impacts of COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-128.
    3. Abdul Rauf & Ameer Muhammad Aamir Abbas & Asim Rafiq & Saifullah Shakir & Saira Abid, 2022. "The Impact of Political Instability, Food Prices, and Crime Rate on Tourism: A Way toward Sustainable Tourism in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Nosica RIZKALLA & Deyna Dwitama SETIADI, 2020. "Appraising The Influence Of Theory Of Consumption Values On Environmentally-Friendly Product Purchase Intention In Indonesia," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 7-25, May.
    5. Joonho Moon & Won Seok Lee & Jimin Shim, 2022. "Chief Executive Officers and the Value of US Airlines: The Moderating Effect of Carrier Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Beata Glinka & Aldona Glińska-Neweś, 2021. "Why Do Consumers Choose Photovoltaic Panels? Identification of the Factors Influencing Consumers’ Choice Behavior regarding Photovoltaic Panel Installations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Raja Kifaya & Daniele Rama, 2023. "Determinants of organic tunisian purchasing behaviour: an application of the consumption values theory," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(2), pages 161-177, June.
    8. Chia-Liang Lin & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Yu-Yu Ma, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Karolina Bielawska & Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2021. "Consumers’ Choice Behaviour Toward Green Clothing," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 238-256.
    10. Innocent, Morgane & Francois-Lecompte, Agnès, 2018. "The values of electricity saving for consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 136-146.
    11. Xiaoyun Zhang & Feng Dong, 2020. "Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Ahsan Akbar & Saqib Ali & Muhammad Azeem Ahmad & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Danish, 2019. "Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Consumption in Pakistan: Moderating Role of Food Neophobia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Molinillo, Sebastian & Aguilar-Illescas, Rocío & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Carvajal-Trujillo, Elena, 2022. "The customer retail app experience: Implications for customer loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Han, Liu & Wang, Shanyong & Zhao, Dingtao & Li, Jun, 2017. "The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 185-197.
    15. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Confente, Ilenia & Scarpi, Daniele & Russo, Ivan, 2020. "Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 431-439.
    17. Sun, Kuo-Shun & Huang, Hsiao-Han, 2022. "The service quality of travel service centers in international airports in Taiwan," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Le Wang & Paul Benjamin Lowry & Xin (Robert) Luo & Han Li, 2023. "Moving Consumers from Free to Fee in Platform-Based Markets: An Empirical Study of Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 275-296, March.
    19. Ruan, Yanya & Mezei, József, 2022. "When do AI chatbots lead to higher customer satisfaction than human frontline employees in online shopping assistance? Considering product attribute type," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Prentice, Catherine & Kadan, Mariam, 2019. "The role of airport service quality in airport and destination choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:20:p:2608-:d:657831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.