IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i5p1255-d1088240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Liang Lin

    (Department of Visual Communication Design, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
    General Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-34400 Euripus Campus, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Jwu-Jenq Chen

    (Department of Interaction Design, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 711, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Yu Ma

    (School of Educational Science, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China)

Abstract

The blended educational method has become a common way of teaching and learning in the post-COVID-19 era. However, the related research on the selection model for the blended design teaching service quality solution is still an important research gap during this period. Therefore, this study proposed a hybrid method of fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to analyse the dimensions, indicators and alternatives of blended design teaching service quality. As for the findings of this research, the dimension of assurance is the most vital factor, followed by responsiveness, reliability and empathy. Meanwhile, this research discovered that the top three significant alternatives are “Employees are trustworthy”, “Safe transaction mechanism and environment” and “Personalised needs of customers”. Also, we found that dimensions utilised to evaluate the quality of education service are similar whether in the post COVID-19 era, in the COVID-19 epidemic or prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The main contribution of this study is to establish a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for the ranking of the blended design teaching service quality index and solution under a fuzzy environment. Finally, the research findings of this study have a guiding role, thereby becoming a guide for the industries related to hybrid design education to maintain good service quality in similar scenarios in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Liang Lin & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Yu-Yu Ma, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:1255-:d:1088240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai-Chao Yao & Jian-Yuan Lai & Wei-Tzer Huang & Jui-Che Tu, 2022. "Utilize Fuzzy Delphi and Analytic Network Process to Construct Consumer Product Design Evaluation Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Rui Zhang, 2021. "Blended Course Evaluation in the Context of English for Specific Purposes: Accountability and Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Patrick Zou & Jie Li, 2010. "Risk identification and assessment in subway projects: case study of Nanjing Subway Line 2," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(12), pages 1219-1238.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    5. Željko Stević & Ilija Tanackov & Adis Puška & Goran Jovanov & Jovica Vasiljević & Darko Lojaničić, 2021. "Development of Modified SERVQUAL–MCDM Model for Quality Determination in Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Kim, Gyutai & Park, Chan S. & Yoon, K. Paul, 1997. "Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 23-33, May.
    7. Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei & Maryam Ghezelbash, 2020. "Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-34, December.
    8. Wu, Cheng-Shiung & Lin, Chin-Tsai & Lee, Chuan, 2010. "Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 190-196, September.
    9. Kassim, Norizan Mohd & Bojei, Jamil, 2002. "Service quality: gaps in the Malaysian telemarketing industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 845-852, October.
    10. Ocampo, Lanndon & Alinsub, Jovir & Casul, Ruselle Anne & Enquig, Germellie & Luar, Mitzi & Panuncillon, Noche & Bongo, Miriam & Ocampo, Christine Omela, 2019. "Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Huan-Ming Zhang & Rui-Qi Ma & Meng-Xiang Deng & Xian-Bei Liu & Huihua Chen, 2021. "Research on Evaluation and Improvement Policy of Higher Education Development Based on TOPSIS-Synthetic Control Method," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, June.
    12. Saaty, Thomas L., 2006. "Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 557-570, January.
    13. Fengsheng Chien & Chia-Nan Wang & Viet Tinh Nguyen & Van Thanh Nguyen & Ka Yin Chau, 2020. "An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Hydroelectric Plant Location Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.
    15. Lin, Robert & Lin, Jennifer Shu-Jen & Chang, Jason & Tang, Didos & Chao, Henry & Julian, Peter C, 2008. "Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 672-678, November.
    16. Chen, I-Shuo, 2016. "A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study based on the Taiwanese airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-18.
    17. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    18. Saaty, Thomas L. & Takizawa, Masahiro, 1986. "Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 229-237, August.
    19. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 1998. "Diagnosis with Dependent Symptoms: Bayes Theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 491-502, August.
    20. Wei Zheng & Yu-Yu Ma & Hung-Lung Lin, 2021. "Research on Blended Learning in Physical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Chinese Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    21. Jason Papathanasiou & Nikolaos Ploskas, 2018. "Multiple Criteria Decision Aid," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-3-319-91648-4, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Yu Ma & Chia-Liang Lin & Hung-Lung Lin, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Index and Solutions for Online English Teaching in the Post-COVID-19 Crisis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Jian Wan & Chia-Liang Lin, 2023. "Research on the Service Quality Index and Alternatives Evaluation and Ranking for Online Yue Kiln Celadon Art Education in Post COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Shin-Liang Chan & Wann-Ming Wey & Pin-Huai Chang, 2014. "Establishing Disaster Resilience Indicators for Tan-sui River Basin in Taiwan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 387-418, January.
    4. Yu-Yu Ma & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Chia-Liang Lin, 2022. "Research on the Priority of Service Quality Index for Online English Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dual Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Partovi, Fariborz Y. & Corredoira, Rafael A., 2002. "Quality function deployment for the good of soccer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 642-656, March.
    6. Kamvysi, Konstantina & Gotzamani, Katerina & Andronikidis, Andreas & Georgiou, Andreas C., 2014. "Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding Fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1083-1094.
    7. Saaty, Thomas L. & Shang, Jennifer S., 2011. "An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 703-715, November.
    8. Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen Emamat & Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota & Mohammad Reza Mehregan & Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam & Philippe Nemery, 2022. "Using ELECTRE-TRI and FlowSort methods in a stock portfolio selection context," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    9. Kheybari, Siamak & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Farazmand, Hadis, 2020. "Analytic network process: An overview of applications," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    10. Chia-Liang Lin & Ching-Yun Hsu & Chu-Ho Ting, 2024. "Research on the Key Influencing Goals for Visual Design Sustainability: A Dual Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.
    15. Villacreses, Geovanna & Gaona, Gabriel & Martínez-Gómez, Javier & Jijón, Diego Juan, 2017. "Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 275-286.
    16. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Manuel Casal-Guisande & Alberto Comesaña-Campos & Alejandro Pereira & José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez & Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño, 2022. "A Decision-Making Methodology Based on Expert Systems Applied to Machining Tools Condition Monitoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Prabhat Kumar & Puneet Tandon, 2019. "A paradigm for customer-driven product design approach using extended axiomatic design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 589-603, February.
    19. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    20. Pınar Kaya Samut, 2017. "Integrated FANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 427-450, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:1255-:d:1088240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.