IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i9p1505-d408915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Software-Automatized Individual Lactation Model Fitting, Peak and Persistence and Bayesian Criteria Comparison for Milk Yield Genetic Studies in Murciano-Granadina Goats

Author

Listed:
  • María Gabriela Pizarro Inostroza

    (Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
    Animal Breeding Consulting, S.L., Córdoba Science and Technology Park Rabanales 21, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Francisco Javier Navas González

    (Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Vincenzo Landi

    (Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70010 Valenzano, Italy)

  • José Manuel León Jurado

    (Centro Agropecuario Provincial de Córdoba, Diputación Provincial de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo

    (Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Javier Fernández Álvarez

    (National Association of Breeders of Murciano-Granadina Goat Breed, Fuente Vaqueros, 18340 Granada, Spain)

  • María del Amparo Martínez Martínez

    (Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

Abstract

SPSS model syntax was defined and used to evaluate the individual performance of 49 linear and non-linear models to fit the lactation curve of 159 Murciano-Granadina goats selected for genotyping analyses. Lactation curve shape, peak and persistence were evaluated for each model using 3107 milk yield controls with an average of 3.78 ± 2.05 lactations per goat. Best fit (Adjusted R 2 ) values (0.47) were reached by the five-parameter logarithmic model of Ali and Schaeffer. Three main possibilities were detected: non-fitting (did not converge), standard (Adjusted R 2 over 75%) and atypical curves (Adjusted R 2 below 75%). All the goats fitted for 38 models. The ability to fit different possible functional forms for each goat, which progressively increased with the number of parameters comprised in each model, translated into a higher sensitivity to explaining curve shape individual variability. However, for models for which all goats fitted, only moderate increases in explanatory and predictive potential (AIC, AICc or BIC) were found. The Ali and Schaeffer model reported the best fitting results to study the genetic variability behind goat milk yield and perhaps enhance the evaluation of curve parameters as trustable future selection criteria to face the future challenges offered by the goat dairy industry.

Suggested Citation

  • María Gabriela Pizarro Inostroza & Francisco Javier Navas González & Vincenzo Landi & José Manuel León Jurado & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo & Javier Fernández Álvarez & María del Amparo Martínez Mart, 2020. "Software-Automatized Individual Lactation Model Fitting, Peak and Persistence and Bayesian Criteria Comparison for Milk Yield Genetic Studies in Murciano-Granadina Goats," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1505-:d:408915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Feng & Paulo, Rui & Molina, German & Clyde, Merlise A. & Berger, Jim O., 2008. "Mixtures of g Priors for Bayesian Variable Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 410-423, March.
    2. Yanguang Chen, 2016. "Spatial Autocorrelation Approaches to Testing Residuals from Least Squares Regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Durbin, J, 1970. "Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 410-421, May.
    4. Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo, 2006. "Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 225-247, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Iglesias Pastrana & Francisco Javier Navas González & Elena Ciani & María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, 2022. "Bayesian Linear Regression and Natural Logarithmic Correction for Digital Image-Based Extraction of Linear and Tridimensional Zoometrics in Dromedary Camels," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Ricardo López-Ruiz, 2022. "Mathematical Biology: Modeling, Analysis, and Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-2, October.
    3. Dismas Said Shija & Okeyo A. Mwai & Julie M. K. Ojango & Daniel M. Komwihangilo & Bockline Omedo Bebe, 2022. "Assessing Lactation Curve Characteristics of Dairy Cows Managed under Contrasting Husbandry Practices and Stressful Environments in Tanzania," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossana, Robert J., 1988. "Interrelated Demands for Buffer Stocks and Productive Inputs: Estimates for Two-Digit Manufacturing Industries," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259428, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Lucrezia Reichlin, 2011. "Market Freedom and the Global Recession," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 59(1), pages 111-135, April.
    3. Jean-Bernard Chatelain & Kirsten Ralf, 2017. "Can We Identify the Fed's Preferences?," Working Papers halshs-01549908, HAL.
    4. repec:wyi:journl:002087 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mishkin, Frederic S, 1982. "Does Anticipated Monetary Policy Matter? An Econometric Investigation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(1), pages 22-51, February.
    6. Percy, A. Jemila & Edwin, M., 2023. "Studies on the performance and emission characteristics of a dual fuel VCR engine using producer gas as secondary fuel: An optimization approach using response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    7. Ons Jedidi & Jean Sébastien Pentecote, 2015. "Robust Signals for Banking Crises," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(3), pages 1617-1629.
    8. Velilla Cerdan, Santiago, 1996. "On the cumulated periodogram goodness-of-fit test in ARMA models," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 10721, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Anna Sokolova, 2023. "Marginal Propensity to Consume and Unemployment: a Meta-analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 813-846, December.
    10. M. N. Bhattacharyya & A. P. Andersen, 1976. "A Post-Sample Diagnostic Test for a Time Services Model," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 1(1), pages 33-56, April.
    11. Hasan, Iftekhar & Horvath, Roman & Mares, Jan, 2020. "Finance and wealth inequality," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. McCracken,M.W. & West,K.D., 2001. "Inference about predictive ability," Working papers 14, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    13. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2021. "Is there a euro effect in the drivers of US FDI? New evidence using Bayesian model averaging techniques," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(4), pages 881-926, November.
    14. Ley, Eduardo & Steel, Mark F.J., 2012. "Mixtures of g-priors for Bayesian model averaging with economic applications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 251-266.
    15. Galharret, Jean-Michel & Philippe, Anne, 2023. "Bayesian analysis for mediation and moderation using g−priors," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 161-172.
    16. Jesus Crespo Cuaresma & Bettina Grün & Paul Hofmarcher & Stefan Humer & Mathias Moser, 2015. "A Comprehensive Approach to Posterior Jointness Analysis in Bayesian Model Averaging Applications," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp193, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    17. Dhruv Rawat & Sujay Patni & Ram Mehta, 2021. "Stock prices and Macroeconomic indicators: Investigating a correlation in Indian context," Papers 2112.08071, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    18. Philipp Piribauer & Jesús Crespo Cuaresma, 2016. "Bayesian Variable Selection in Spatial Autoregressive Models," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 457-479, October.
    19. Ley, Eduardo & Steel, Mark F. J., 2007. "On the effect of prior assumptions in Bayesian model averaging with applications to growth regression," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4238, The World Bank.
    20. Forte, Anabel & Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2015. "Does social capital matter for European regional growth?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 47-64.
    21. Robert Fluri, 1979. "Konjunkturdiagnose und Prognose in der Schweiz: Die Verwendung qualitativer Informationen: Konjunkturtest," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 115(III), pages 301-322, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1505-:d:408915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.