IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v3y2022i4p59-1052d994702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Lactation Curve Characteristics of Dairy Cows Managed under Contrasting Husbandry Practices and Stressful Environments in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Dismas Said Shija

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, Njoro P.O. Box 536-20115, Kenya
    Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro P.O. Box 3004, Tanzania)

  • Okeyo A. Mwai

    (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya)

  • Julie M. K. Ojango

    (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 30709-00100, Kenya)

  • Daniel M. Komwihangilo

    (Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Dodoma P.O. Box 834, Tanzania)

  • Bockline Omedo Bebe

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, Njoro P.O. Box 536-20115, Kenya)

Abstract

The ability of smallholder dairy farming systems (SHDFS) to achieve desirable lactation-curve characteristics is constrained or reduced by environmental stresses. Under stressful production environments in the tropics, the better lactation-curve characteristics in smallholder dairy farms are a result of improved dairy genetics and husbandry practices. Better husbandry practices improve animal health and welfare status, which is important to sustain SHDFS in the tropics where dairy cattle are constantly exposed to multiple environmental stresses of feed scarcity, disease infections and heat load. In this case, lactating cows in smallholder dairy farms labelled positive deviants are expected to express lactation curve characteristics differently from typical farms, regardless of the stress levels confronted. Thus, this study tested this hypothesis with Holstein–Friesian and Ayrshire cows in two milksheds in Tanzania classified them into low-and high-stress environments. A two-factor nested research design was used, with farm (positive deviant and typical) nested within the environment. Positive deviant farms were farms that performed above the population average, attaining ≥0.35 Mcal NE L /d energy balance, ≥6.32 L/cow/day milk yield, ≤1153.28 days age at first calving, ≤633.68 days calving interval and ≤12.75 per 100 animal-years at risk disease-incidence density. In this study, a total of 3262 test-day milk production records from 524 complete lactations of 397 cows in 332 farms were fitted to the Jenkins and Ferrell model to estimate lactation curve parameters. In turn, the outcome parameters a and k were used to estimate lactation curve characteristics. The lactation curve characteristic estimates proved the study hypothesis. Regardless of the stress levels, cows in positive deviant farms expressed lactation curve characteristics differently from cows managed in typical farms. The scale ( a ) and shape ( k ) parameters together with peak yield and time to peak yield indicated higher lactation performance in positive deviant farms than in typical farms under low- and high-stress environments ( p < 0.05). Lactation persistency was higher in positive deviants than typical farms by 14.37 g/day and 2.33 g/day for Holstein–Friesian cows and by 9.91 g/day and 2.16 g/day for Ayrshire cows in low- and high-stress environments. Compared to cows managed in typical farms, cows in positive deviant farms attained higher lactation performance under low- and high-stress; Holstein–Friesian produced 50.2% and 36.2% more milk, respectively, while Ayrshire produced 52.4% and 46.0% more milk, respectively. The higher milk productivity in positive deviant farms can be associated with the deployment of husbandry practices that more effectively ameliorated feed scarcity, heat load and disease infections stresses, which are prevalent in tropical smallholder dairy farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Dismas Said Shija & Okeyo A. Mwai & Julie M. K. Ojango & Daniel M. Komwihangilo & Bockline Omedo Bebe, 2022. "Assessing Lactation Curve Characteristics of Dairy Cows Managed under Contrasting Husbandry Practices and Stressful Environments in Tanzania," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:3:y:2022:i:4:p:59-1052:d:994702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/4/59/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/4/59/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birhanu, Mulugeta Yitayih & Girma, Anteneh & Puskur, Ranjitha, 2017. "Determinants of success and intensity of livestock feed technologies use in Ethiopia: Evidence from a positive deviance perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 15-25.
    2. María Gabriela Pizarro Inostroza & Francisco Javier Navas González & Vincenzo Landi & José Manuel León Jurado & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo & Javier Fernández Álvarez & María del Amparo Martínez Mart, 2020. "Software-Automatized Individual Lactation Model Fitting, Peak and Persistence and Bayesian Criteria Comparison for Milk Yield Genetic Studies in Murciano-Granadina Goats," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Gellynck, Xavier & Kuhne, Bianka, 2010. "Horizontal and Vertical Networks for Innovation in the Traditional Food Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10.
    4. Dismas Said Shija & Okeyo A. Mwai & Perminus Karubiu Migwi & Daniel M. Komwihangilo & Bockline Omedo Bebe, 2022. "Identifying Positive Deviant Farms Using Pareto-Optimality Ranking Technique to Assess Productivity and Livelihood Benefits in Smallholder Dairy Farming under Contrasting Stressful Environments in Tan," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Twine, Edgar E. & Omore, Amos & Githinji, Julius, 2018. "Uncertainty in milk production by smallholders in Tanzania and its implications for investment," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dismas Said Shija & Okeyo A. Mwai & Perminus K. Migwi & Raphael Mrode & Bockline Omedo Bebe, 2022. "Characterizing Management Practices in High- and Average-Performing Smallholder Dairy Farms under Contrasting Environmental Stresses in Tanzania," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Ciliberti, Stefano & Bröring, Stefanie & Martino, Gaetano, 2015. "Drivers, effects and peculiarities of innovation activities in the food industry: a comparison across EU Member States using CIS data," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206249, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    4. Cadilhon, Jean-Joseph & Pham, Ngoc Diep & Maass, Brigitte, 2016. "The Tanga Dairy Platform: Fostering Innovations for more Efficient Dairy Chain Coordination in Tanzania," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Henchion, Maeve M. & Sorenson, Douglas, 2012. "Formal Food-related Networks in Ireland: A Case Study Analysis," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Minarelli, Francesca & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2015. "Innovation in European food SMEs: determinants and links between types," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Yang, Xin & Zhou, Xiaohe & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2022. "Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Janarthanan Balakrishnan & Pantea Foroudi, 2020. "Does Corporate Reputation Matter? Role of Social Media in Consumer Intention to Purchase Innovative Food Product," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 181-200, August.
    9. Carlos Iglesias Pastrana & Francisco Javier Navas González & Elena Ciani & María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, 2022. "Bayesian Linear Regression and Natural Logarithmic Correction for Digital Image-Based Extraction of Linear and Tridimensional Zoometrics in Dromedary Camels," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Andreas Tsakiridis & Michael Wallace & James Breen & Cathal O'Donoghue & Kevin Hanrahan, 2021. "Beef quality assurance schemes: Can they improve farm economic performance?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 451-471, July.
    11. Ricardo López-Ruiz, 2022. "Mathematical Biology: Modeling, Analysis, and Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-2, October.
    12. Ciliberti, Stefano & Bröring, Stefanie & Martino, Gaetano, 2015. "Drivers of innovation in the European Food Industry: Evidences from the Community Innovation Survey," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Kuhne, Bianka & Lambrecht, Evelien & Vanhonacker, Filiep & Pieniak, Zuzanna & Gellynck, Xavier, 2014. "Factors Underlying Farmers’ Decisions to Participate in Networks," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Zhipeng Huang & Yan Zhang & Yi Huang & Gang Xu & Shengping Shang, 2022. "Sales Scale, Non-Pastoral Employment and Herders’ Technology Adoption: Evidence from Pastoral China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Shuhong Wang & Ning Yin & Zhihai Yang, 2021. "Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10528-10546, July.
    16. Kuhne, Bianka & Lefebvre, Virginie M. & Gellynck, Xavier, 2013. "Knowledge Exchange in Innovation Networks: How Networks Support open Innovation in Food SMEs," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164742, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    17. Bianka Kühne & Xavier Gellynck & R.D. Weaver, 2015. "Enhancing Innovation Capacity Through Vertical, Horizontal, and Third‐Party Networks for Traditional Foods," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 294-313, June.
    18. Ngarava, Saul & Mushunje, Abbyssinia & Chaminuka, Petronella, 2020. "Qualitative benefits of livestock development programmes. Evidence from the Kaonafatso ya Dikgomo (KyD) Scheme in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Aron TOROK & Jozsef TOTH & Jeremias Mate BALOGH, 2018. "Networking theory of innovation in practice - The Hungarian case," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 536-545.
    20. Gao, Yang & Liu, Bei & Yu, Lili & Yang, Haoran & Yin, Shijiu, 2019. "Social capital, land tenure and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:3:y:2022:i:4:p:59-1052:d:994702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.