IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v64y2018i12id60-2018-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Networking theory of innovation in practice - The Hungarian case

Author

Listed:
  • Aron TOROK
  • Jozsef TOTH

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Jeremias Mate BALOGH

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

According to the European Innovation Scoreboard (2017) report, Hungary's summarised innovation score is 67.4 against the EU28 average of 102. This implies that the Hungarian economy has got rather serious disadvantages in the European Union community. This statement is more pronounced in the case of the food industry. From an innovation point of view food industry is seen as a slow one, which is lagging behind the technology pushed possibilities, but sometimes behind the customers' desires and requirements as well. In our research, we determine why the food companies in Hungary do not engage in innovation activities and if they do so, what are the main drivers of their innovation performance? We use the Community Innovation Survey (CIS 2012a) data and employ double hurdle estimation because of the nature of the innovation distribution. This method also helps in overcoming the selection bias problem, which necessarily occurs in this situation. Results prove that networking scope as well as networking intensity, play an important role in explaining innovation performance. The size and market obstacles are also significant factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Aron TOROK & Jozsef TOTH & Jeremias Mate BALOGH, 2018. "Networking theory of innovation in practice - The Hungarian case," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 536-545.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:64:y:2018:i:12:id:60-2018-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/60/2018-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/60/2018-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/60/2018-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/60/2018-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birgit Aschhoff & Tobias Schmidt, 2008. "Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation—Happy Together?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 33(1), pages 41-62, August.
    2. Menrad, Klaus, 2001. "Innovations at the Borderline of Food, Nutrition and Health in Germany - A Systems' Theory Approach," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(06), pages 1-11.
    3. Fernandes, Cristina & Ferreira, João & Raposo, Mario, 2013. "Drivers to firm innovation and their effects on performance: An international comparison," MPRA Paper 46776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gilsing, V. & Nooteboom, B., 2004. "Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology," Working Papers 04.16, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    5. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    6. Belderbos, Rene & Carree, Martin & Diederen, Bert & Lokshin, Boris & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2004. "Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1237-1263, November.
    7. Mansfield, Edwin & Lee, Jeong-Yeon, 1996. "The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1047-1058, October.
    8. Cragg, John G, 1971. "Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(5), pages 829-844, September.
    9. Gellynck, Xavier & Kuhne, Bianka, 2010. "Horizontal and Vertical Networks for Innovation in the Traditional Food Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10.
    10. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Kentaro Nobeoka, 2000. "Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 345-367, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valeriya Vlasova & Vitaliy Roud, 2020. "Cooperative Strategies in the Age of Open Innovation: Choice of Partners, Geography and Duration," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 80-94.
    2. Toth, J. & Torok, A. & Balogh, J.M., 2018. "Networking theory of innovation in practice A Pan-European overview based on the Community Innovation Survey," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277158, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Cannavale, Chiara & Esempio, Anna & Ferretti, Marco, 2021. "Up- and down- alliances: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    4. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    5. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    6. Lhuillery, Stéphane & Pfister, Etienne, 2009. "R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 45-57, February.
    7. Spyros Arvanitis, 2009. "How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance?," KOF Working papers 09-233, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    8. Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2015. "Determinants of R&D University-Frim Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: a Perspective from the Italian Food and Drink Industry," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 225668, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Xiu SHI & Rui JING & Guang-ming HOU & Jun-peng WANG, 2019. "Network Position Advantage and Technological Innovation of China’s New Energy Vehicle Based on the Perspective of Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Debackere, Koenraad & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2005. "The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 321-342, April.
    11. García-Piqueres, Gema & García-Ramos, Rebeca, 2022. "Complementarity between CSR dimensions and innovation: behaviour, objective or both?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 475-489.
    12. Faria, Pedro & Schmidt, Tobias, 2007. "International cooperation on innovation: empirical evidence for German and Portuguese firms," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,30, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6963 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:rnp:ppaper:431503 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Taimin Li & Afzal Izzaz Zahari & Soliha Sanusi, 2023. "The Sustainability of Technological Innovation in China: From the Perspective of Network Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Mao, Chongfeng & Yu, Xianyun & Zhou, Qing & Harms, Rainer & Fang, Gang, 2020. "Knowledge growth in university-industry innovation networks – Results from a simulation study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Ascension Barajas & Elena Huergo & Lourdes Moreno, 2012. "Measuring the economic impact of research joint ventures supported by the EU Framework Programme," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 917-942, December.
    18. Geoffrey Leuridan, 2025. "« Malgré tout c'est notre chantier ! » -Enjeux et défis de la gestion des connaissances et des compétences dans les relations entre donneur d'ordre et sous-traitants," Post-Print hal-05089095, HAL.
    19. Ivano D'Antonio, 2015. "Cooperazione e spesa in R&S: evidenze empiriche dalla Community Innovation Survey," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(116), pages 90-110.
    20. Andries, Petra & Hünermund, Paul, 2014. "Staging innovation projects: (when) does it pay off?," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-091, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    21. Liu, Ming & Shan, Yanfei & Li, Yemei, 2023. "Heterogeneous Partners, R&D cooperation and corporate innovation capability: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    22. Erika Raquel Badillo & Rosina Moreno, 2014. "“Are R&D collaborative agreements persistent at the firm level? Empirical evidence for the Spanish case”," IREA Working Papers 201410, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Mar 2014.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:64:y:2018:i:12:id:60-2018-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.