Author
Listed:
- Miao Tian
(School of Mathematics, East China University of Technology and Science, Shanghai 200237, China)
- Shuhuai Li
(Hangzhou College of Commerce, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Xianghan Cao
(Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland)
- Guizhou Wang
(Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)
Abstract
In the globalized economic system, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors have emerged as critical dimensions for assessing non-financial performance and ensuring the long-term sustainable development of businesses, influencing corporate behavior, investor expectations, and regulatory landscapes. This article applies the VAR-DY network analysis method to construct a large-scale financial volatility spillover network covering all Chinese stocks. It explores the risk transmission paths among different ESG-rated groups and analyzes the patterns and impacts of risk transmission during extreme market volatility. The study finds that as ESG ratings decrease from AAA to C, the network’s average shortest path length and average connectedness strength decreases, indicating that highly rated companies play a central role in the network and maintain their ESG ratings through close connections, positively affecting market stability. However, analyses of the 2015 Chinese stock market crash and the COVID-19 pandemic show a general increase in volatility spillover effects. Notably, the direction of risk spillover in relation to ESG ratings was opposite in these two events, reflecting differences in the underlying drivers of market volatility. This suggests that under extreme market conditions, traditional risk management tools need to be optimized by incorporating ESG factors to better address risk contagion.
Suggested Citation
Miao Tian & Shuhuai Li & Xianghan Cao & Guizhou Wang, 2025.
"Network Analysis of Volatility Spillovers Between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Rating Stocks: Evidence from China,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1586-:d:1654017
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1586-:d:1654017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.