IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i6p884-d768270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Ghada A. Altarawneh

    (Department of Accounting, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ahmad B. Hassanat

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ahmad S. Tarawneh

    (Department of Algorithms and Their Applications, Eotvos Lorand University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Carfì

    (Department of Mathematics, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Abdullah Almuhaimeed

    (The National Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The classic notion of a win–win situation has a key flaw in that it cannot always offer the parties equal amounts of winningsbecause each party believes they are winners. In reality, one party may win more than the other. This strategy is not limited to a single product or negotiation; it may be applied to a variety of situations in life. We present a novel way to measure the win–win situation in this paper. The proposed method employs fuzzy logic to create a mathematical model that aids negotiators in quantifying their winning percentages. The model is put to the test on real-life negotiation scenarios such as the Iraqi–Jordanian oil deal and iron ore negotiation (2005–2009), in addition to scenarios from the game of chess. The presented model has proven to be a useful tool in practice and can be easily generalized to be utilized in other domains as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghada A. Altarawneh & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Ahmad S. Tarawneh & David Carfì & Abdullah Almuhaimeed, 2022. "Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:884-:d:768270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/884/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/884/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghada A. Altarawneh, 2018. "A fuzzy logic-based approach for pricing of electricity in Jordan," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(5), pages 365-372, October.
    2. Ahmad B A Hassanat, 2018. "Two-point-based binary search trees for accelerating big data classification using KNN," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Renato X. Coutinho & Eliziane S. Dávila & Wendel M. dos Santos & João B. T. Rocha & Diogo O. G. Souza & Vanderlei Folmer & Robson L. Puntel, 2012. "Brazilian scientific production in science education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 697-710, September.
    4. Deleersnyder, B. & Dekimpe, M.G. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Koll, O., 2007. "Win-win strategies at discount stores," Other publications TiSEM 34fbe624-0ee7-4c52-b640-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Richard J. Ladle & Peter A. Todd & Ana. C. M. Malhado, 2012. "Assessing insularity in global science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 745-750, December.
    6. Tim Newton, 2005. "Practical Idealism: An Oxymoron?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 869-884, June.
    7. Ozgur Isil & Michael T. Hernke, 2017. "The Triple Bottom Line: A Critical Review from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1235-1251, December.
    8. Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. & Phillis, Yannis A., 2004. "Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 149-172, February.
    9. Liu, Zuming & Zhao, Yingru & Wang, Xiaonan, 2020. "Long-term economic planning of combined cooling heating and power systems considering energy storage and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. Jingjing Yao & Li Ma & Lin Zhang, 2018. "From Lab Experiments to Real Negotiations: An Investigation of International Iron Ore Negotiations," Post-Print hal-01745362, HAL.
    11. Peter L. F. Fast, 2012. "L'Aquila: science is not a crystal ball," Nature, Nature, vol. 491(7423), pages 192-192, November.
    12. Ghada Altarawneh, 2021. "A fuzzy logic-based approach for progressive pricing of freshwater in Jordan," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 480-489, August.
    13. Pushkala Prasad & Michael Elmes, 2005. "In the Name of the Practical: Unearthing the Hegemony of Pragmatics in the Discourse of Environmental Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 845-867, June.
    14. Harinck, Fieke & De Dreu, Carsten K. W. & Van Vianen, Annelies E. M., 2000. "The Impact of Conflict Issues on Fixed-Pie Perceptions, Problem Solving, and Integrative Outcomes in Negotiation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 329-358, March.
    15. Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Latan, Hengky & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Do Environmental Practices Improve Business Performance Even in an Economic Crisis? Extending the Win-Win Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 189-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George R. Milne & Begum Kaplan & Kristen L. Walker & Larry Zacharias, 2021. "Connecting with the future: The role of science fiction movies in helping consumers understand privacy‐technology trade‐offs," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 737-762, September.
    2. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    3. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    4. Bart L. MacCarthy & Surajit Das & Wafaa A. H. Ahmed, 2024. "Smell the Perfume: Can Blockchain Guarantee the Provenance of Key Product Ingredients in the Fragrance Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Merlone, Ugo & Lupano, Matteo, 2022. "Third party funding: The minimum claim value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 738-747.
    6. Olivier, Michelle M. & Howard, Johnathon L. & Wilson, Ben P. & Robinson, Wayne A., 2018. "Correlating Localisation and Sustainability and Exploring the Causality of the Relationship," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 749-765.
    7. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    8. Sahar E-Vahdati & Nor Azila Mohd Noor & Pei Yew Mah & Francis Chuah & Filzah Md Isa, 2023. "Social and Environmental Sustainability, Workers’ Well-Being, and Affective Organizational Commitment in Palm Oil Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Ozgur Isil & Michael T. Hernke, 2017. "The Triple Bottom Line: A Critical Review from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1235-1251, December.
    10. Tonnang, Henri E.Z. & Hervé, Bisseleua D.B. & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Salifu, Daisy & Subramanian, Sevgan & Ngowi, Valentine B. & Guimapi, Ritter Y.A. & Anani, Bruce & Kakmeni, Francois M.M. & Aff, 2017. "Advances in crop insect modelling methods—Towards a whole system approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 88-103.
    11. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.
    12. Sheikh Basharul Islam & Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi, 2021. "Determining the Influence of Private Labels on Sales of National Brands: A Qualitative Approach," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 133-145, June.
    13. Todorov, Vladislav & Marinova, Dora, 2011. "Modelling sustainability," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 1397-1408.
    14. Elizabeth C. Teixeira & Victor E. L. Silva & Nidia N. Fabré & Vandick S. Batista, 2020. "Marine shrimp fisheries research—a mismatch on spatial and thematic needs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 591-606, January.
    15. Jill F. Solomon & Aris Solomon & Simon D. Norton & Nathan L. Joseph, 2011. "Private climate change reporting: an emerging discourse of risk and opportunity?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(8), pages 1119-1148, October.
    16. Hökelekli, Gizem & Lamey, Lien & Verboven, Frank, 2017. "The battle of traditional retailers versus discounters: The role of PL tiers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 11-22.
    17. Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 284-290.
    18. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2024. "Financial Sustainability: Exploring the Influence of the Triple Bottom Line Economic Dimension on Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Inge Geyskens & Barbara Deleersnyder & Marnik G. Dekimpe & Didi Lin, 2024. "Do consumers benefit from national-brand listings by hard discounters?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 97-118, January.
    20. Pavel Laptev & Sergey Litovkin & Sergey Davydenko & Anton Konev & Evgeny Kostyuchenko & Alexander Shelupanov, 2022. "Neural Network-Based Price Tag Data Analysis," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:884-:d:768270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.