IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p47-d1013305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Settings and Effects on Agricultural Land Conversion: A Global and Spatial Analysis of European Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Eda Ustaoglu

    (Department of Economics, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri 38030, Turkey)

  • Brendan Williams

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, D14 E099 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Spatial planning systems and institutions have a significant role in managing non-agricultural land growth in Europe and the assessment of how their implementation impacts on agricultural land consumption is of great significance for policy and institutional improvement. Reducing the area of agricultural land taken for urban development, or eliminating such conversion, is an international policy priority aiming to maintain the amount and quality of land resources currently available for food production and sustainable development. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of land use planning systems and institutional settings on urban conversion of agricultural land in the 265 NUTS2 level EU27 and UK regions. Taking these regions as the unit of our analysis, the research developed and used global and local econometrics models to estimate the effect based on socio-economic, institutional and land use data for the 2000–2018 period. There is limited research focusing on the impacts of institutional settings and planning types of the European countries on the conversion of agricultural land. Furthermore, existing research has not considered the spatial relationships with the determinants of agricultural land conversion and the response variable, therefore, our research aimed to contribute to the literature on the subject. The results showed that the types of spatial planning systems and institution variables significantly impact the conversion of agricultural land to urban uses. Socio-economic indicators and areas of agricultural and urban land have significant impact on agricultural land conversion for any type of spatial planning system. A further result was that decentralization and political fragmentation were positively associated with agricultural land conversion while quality of regional government and governance was negatively associated. A local regression model was assessed to explore the different spatial patterns of the relationships driving agricultural land conversion. The main empirical finding from this model was that there was spatial variation of driving factors of agricultural land conversion in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams, 2022. "Institutional Settings and Effects on Agricultural Land Conversion: A Global and Spatial Analysis of European Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:47-:d:1013305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eda Ustaoglu & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni, 2022. "What Drives Residential Land Expansion and Densification? An Analysis of Growing and Shrinking Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Wang, Xiang & Shao, Shuai & Li, Ling, 2019. "Agricultural inputs, urbanization, and urban-rural income disparity: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 67-84.
    3. Wang, Xiaoxi & Biewald, Anne & Dietrich, Jan Philipp & Schmitz, Christoph & Lotze-Campen, Hermann & Humpenöder, Florian & Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon & Popp, Alexander, 2016. "Taking account of governance: Implications for land-use dynamics, food prices, and trade patterns," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-24.
    4. Munkhnasan Lamchin & Woo-Kyun Lee & Seong Woo Jeon & Jong-Yeol Lee & Cholho Song & Dongfan Piao & Chul Hee Lim & Akhmadi Khaulenbek & Itgelt Navaandorj, 2017. "Correlation between Desertification and Environmental Variables Using Remote Sensing Techniques in Hogno Khaan, Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Dombi, Mihály, 2021. "Types of planning systems and effects on construction material volumes: An explanatory analysis in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Vincent Nadin & Dominic Stead & Marcin Dąbrowski & Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado, 2021. "Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 791-803, May.
    7. Antonio N. Bojanic & LaPorchia A. Collins, 2021. "Differential effects of decentralization on income inequality: evidence from developed and developing countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1969-2004, April.
    8. Edita, Abalikstiene & Dalia, Perkumiene, 2022. "Challenges and problems of agricultural land use changes in Lithuania according to territorial planning documents: Case of Vilnius district municipality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Thia C. Hennessy & Tahir Rehman, 2008. "Assessing the Impact of the ‘Decoupling’ Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy on Irish Farmers’ Off‐farm Labour Market Participation Decisions," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 41-56, February.
    10. Ehrlich, Maximilian V. & Hilber, Christian A.L. & Schöni, Olivier, 2018. "Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 4-18.
    11. Karen C. Seto & Robert K. Kaufmann, 2003. "Modeling the Drivers of Urban Land Use Change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating Remote Sensing with Socioeconomic Data," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(1), pages 106-121.
    12. Mohammad Rondhi & Pravitasari Anjar Pratiwi & Vivi Trisna Handini & Aryo Fajar Sunartomo & Subhan Arif Budiman, 2018. "Agricultural Land Conversion, Land Economic Value, and Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study in East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Vaclav Vojtech, 2010. "Policy Measures Addressing Agri-environmental Issues," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 24, OECD Publishing.
    14. Judith Nzyoka & Peter A. Minang & Priscilla Wainaina & Lalisa Duguma & Lucas Manda & Emmanuel Temu, 2021. "Landscape Governance and Sustainable Land Restoration: Evidence from Shinyanga, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Mawuli Asempah & Wahib Sahwan & Brigitta Schütt, 2021. "Assessment of Land Cover Dynamics and Drivers of Urban Expansion Using Geospatial and Logistic Regression Approach in Wa Municipality, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Kuemmerle, Tobias & Levers, Christian & Erb, Karlheinz & Estel, Stephan & Jepsen, Martin R & Müller, Daniel & Plutzar, Christoph & Stürck, Julia & Verkerk, Pieter J & Verburg, Peter H & Reenberg, Anet, 2016. "Hotspots of land use change in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14.
    17. Rickebusch, Sophie & Gellrich, Mario & Lischke, Heike & Guisan, Antoine & Zimmermann, Niklaus E., 2007. "Combining probabilistic land-use change and tree population dynamics modelling to simulate responses in mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 157-168.
    18. Billings, Stephen B. & Johnson, Erik B., 2016. "Agglomeration within an urban area," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 13-25.
    19. Wojciech Sroka & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Boguslawa Kwoczynska, 2018. "Agricultural Land vs. Urbanisation in Chosen Polish Metropolitan Areas: A Spatial Analysis Based on Regression Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Reed, James & Ickowitz, Amy & Chervier, Colas & Djoudi, Houria & Moombe, Kaala & Ros-Tonen, Mirjam & Yanou, Malaika & Yuliani, Linda & Sunderland, Terry, 2020. "Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    21. Davies, Clive & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2017. "Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 93-101.
    22. Verena Rodorff & Marianna Siegmund-Schultze & Maike Guschal & Sonja Hölzl & Johann Köppel, 2019. "Good Governance: A Framework for Implementing Sustainable Land Management, Applied to an Agricultural Case in Northeast-Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    23. J�rgen Primdahl & Erling Andersen & Simon Swaffield & Lone Kristensen, 2013. "Intersecting Dynamics of Agricultural Structural Change and Urbanisation within European Rural Landscapes: Change Patterns and Policy Implications," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 799-817, December.
    24. Klimach, Anna & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "The Polish land administration system supporting good governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 547-555.
    25. van der Sluis, Theo & Pedroli, Bas & Kristensen, Søren B.P. & Lavinia Cosor, Georgia & Pavlis, Evangelos, 2016. "Changing land use intensity in Europe – Recent processes in selected case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 777-785.
    26. Meyer, Markus A. & Früh-Müller, Andrea, 2020. "Patterns and drivers of recent agricultural land-use change in Southern Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    27. Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, Aart & Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2010. "The worldwide governance indicators : methodology and analytical issues," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5430, The World Bank.
    28. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Wenbai Yang & Wei Kang, 2017. "Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1247-1265, November.
    29. Thorsten Wiechmann & Karina M. Pallagst, 2012. "Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A Comparison of Transformation Patterns and Local Strategies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 261-280, March.
    30. Beatriz Fernandez & Maxwell Hartt, 2022. "Growing shrinking cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 1308-1319, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yutong Wang & Jianyu Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Obstacle Factor Analysis of Land Ecological Security in the Surrounding Areas of Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Zhen Yang & Yang Hong & Guofang Zhai & Shihang Wang & Mingsong Zhao & Chao Liu & Xuexiang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Coupling of Population and Economic Densities and the Effect of Topography in Anhui Province, China, at a Grid Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiménez-Olivencia, Yolanda & Ibáñez-Jiménez, Álvaro & Porcel-Rodríguez, Laura & Zimmerer, Karl, 2021. "Land use change dynamics in Euro-mediterranean mountain regions: Driving forces and consequences for the landscape," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Yuanzhen Song & Weijie He & Jian Zeng, 2023. "Exploration of Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Threshold Effect of Shrinking Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Winkler, Klara J. & Scown, Murray W. & Nicholas, Kimberly A., 2018. "A classification to align social-ecological land systems research with policy in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 137-145.
    4. Lucia Palšová & Katarína Melichová & Ina Melišková, 2019. "Modelling Development, Territorial and Legislative Factors Impacting the Changes in Use of Agricultural Land in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Wojciech Sroka & Dariusz Żmija, 2021. "Farming Systems Changes in the Urban Shadow: A Mixed Approach Based on Statistical Analysis and Expert Surveys," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Meyer, Markus A. & Früh-Müller, Andrea, 2020. "Patterns and drivers of recent agricultural land-use change in Southern Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Xu Yang & Xuan Zou & Xueqi Liu & Qixuan Li & Siqian Zou & Ming Li, 2023. "The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Urban Sprawl in China’s Counties," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Kapeliushnikov, Rostislav & Kuznetsov, Andrei & Demina, Natalia & Kuznetsova, Olga, 2013. "Threats to security of property rights in a transition economy: An empirical perspective," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 245-264.
    9. Rakesh Sambharya & Martina Musteen, 2014. "Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 314-330, December.
    10. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    11. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    12. Haichao Fan & Xiang Gao, 2017. "Domestic Creditor Rights and External Private Debt," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(606), pages 2410-2440, November.
    13. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M. & Llorca, M., 2018. "Power Sector Reform and Corruption: Evidence from Electricity Industry in Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1801, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    14. Yanzhao Wang & Jianfei Cao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Socioeconomic Development on Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in China’s Cities Based on Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and MGWR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Gamberger, Dragan & Smuc, Tomislav, 2013. "Good governance problems and recent financial crises in some EU countries," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-39, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Arief Bustaman & Rina Indiastuti & B. Budiono & Titik Anas, 2022. "Quality of Indonesia’s domestic institutions and export performance in the era of global value chains," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Potrafke, Niklas, 2019. "Electoral cycles in perceived corruption: International empirical evidence," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 215-224.
    19. Dan Pan & Jinlong Zhou & Yi Yu & Shengdong Chen, 2024. "Rural Collective Property Rights System Reform and Urban-Rural Income Gap: A County-Scale Big Data Analysis in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    20. Uchenna Efobi & Simplice Asongu & Ibukun Beecroft, 2018. "Aid, Terrorism, and Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Insight Conditioned on Corruption Control," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 610-630, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:47-:d:1013305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.