IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i3p7674-7684.html

Land Conversion and Food Security in Sabah: A Dpsir-Based Empirical Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Izzah Ahemad

    (Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

  • Azizah Ismail

    (Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

  • Maziah Ismail

    (Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

  • Wee Siaw Chui

    (Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

Abstract

Agricultural land conversion in Sabah poses an increasing challenge to regional food security, particularly in the context of rapid urbanisation, tenure vulnerabilities, and fragmented land governance. This study aims to examines the extent, patterns, and implications of agricultural land conversion in Sabah by analysing 36 verified conversion cases recorded in 2023, involving approximately 238.08 acres of land. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining descriptive analysis of verified land conversion records with qualitative document analysis of a rezoning appeal case in Papar. The study applies the Driving Forces–Pressures–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework to systematically interpret the socio-economic, institutional, and governance dynamics influencing agricultural land loss. The findings show that urban expansion, speculative development, and housing demand act as key driving forces that generate pressures on agricultural land, particularly through rezoning applications and weak tenure safeguards. These pressures have weakened the state of agricultural land protection, especially for Native Title holdings, which appear particularly vulnerable to conversion. The impacts of this trend include the reduction of land available for food production, increasing pressure on local food systems, and heightened risks to Sabah’s food sovereignty. The Papar case further demonstrates how land designated for food security purposes may remain vulnerable to development pressure when institutional coordination and zoning enforcement are weak. Institutional responses, including zoning controls, departmental objections, and planning procedures, were found to be inconsistent and insufficient. The study underscores the need for stronger and more enforceable land governance mechanisms to protect agricultural land and strengthen food security in Sabah.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Izzah Ahemad & Azizah Ismail & Maziah Ismail & Wee Siaw Chui, 2026. "Land Conversion and Food Security in Sabah: A Dpsir-Based Empirical Assessment," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(3), pages 7674-7684, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:7674-7684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss3-pg7674-7684-202604_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/land-conversion-and-food-security-in-sabah-a-dpsir-based-empirical-assessment/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams, 2022. "Institutional Settings and Effects on Agricultural Land Conversion: A Global and Spatial Analysis of European Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Most. Nilufa Khatun, 2019. "What are the Drivers Influencing Smallholder Farmers Access to Formal Credit System? Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(3), pages 162-170, September.
    3. Most. Nilufa Khatun, 2019. "What are the Drivers Influencing Smallholder Farmers Access to Formal Credit System? Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(3), pages 162-170.
    4. Michael Vassalos & Zhifeng Gao & Lisha Zhang, 2017. "Factors Affecting Current and Future CSA Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    2. Zhen Yang & Yang Hong & Guofang Zhai & Shihang Wang & Mingsong Zhao & Chao Liu & Xuexiang Yu, 2023. "Spatial Coupling of Population and Economic Densities and the Effect of Topography in Anhui Province, China, at a Grid Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Jairus J. Rossi & Timothy A. Woods & James E. Allen, 2017. "Impacts of a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Voucher Program on Food Lifestyle Behaviors: Evidence from an Employer-Sponsored Pilot Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Emily H. Morgan & Michelle M. Severs & Karla L. Hanson & Jared McGuirt & Florence Becot & Weiwei Wang & Jane Kolodinsky & Marilyn Sitaker & Stephanie B. Jilcott Pitts & Alice Ammerman & Rebecca A. Seg, 2018. "Gaining and Maintaining a Competitive Edge: Evidence from CSA Members and Farmers on Local Food Marketing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Rosman, Anna & MacPherson, Joseph & Arndt, Marie & Helming, Katharina, 2024. "Perceived resilience of community supported agriculture in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Junhong Chen & Zhifeng Gao & Xuqi Chen & Lisha Zhang, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Dynamics of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Membership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Yutong Wang & Jianyu Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Obstacle Factor Analysis of Land Ecological Security in the Surrounding Areas of Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Mehmet Ali Çelik & Adile Bilik & Muhammed Ernur Akiner & Dessalegn Obsi Gemeda, 2025. "How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Anna-Birgitte Milford & Daniel Keech & Sarah Wangui Muiruri, 2025. "Community supported agriculture’s perceived positive impacts on mental health and vegetable consumption in Norway and the UK," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Yahya Dabaghi & Shahla Choobchian & Hassan Sadighi & Hossein Azadi, 2022. "Consumers’ attitude toward participation in community-supported aquaculture: a case of Kurdistan province in the west of Iran," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 870-889, December.
    11. Punnaros Pisarn & Man-Keun Kim & Shang-Ho Yang, 2020. "A Potential Sustainable Pathway for Community-Supported Agriculture in Taiwan: The Consumer Perspective in a Farmers’ Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Sota Takagi & Yusuke Numazawa & Kentaro Katsube & Wataru Omukai & Miki Saijo & Takumi Ohashi, 2024. "Theorizing the socio-cultural dynamics of consumer decision-making for participation in community-supported agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Giovanni Peira & Riccardo Beltramo & Maria Beatrice Pairotti & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2018. "Foodservice in a UNESCO Site: The Restaurateurs’ Perception on Communication and Promotion Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Heru Iskhan & I. Gusti Ayu Ketut R.H & Hartiwiningsih, 2025. "The Current State of Legal Governance in the Batam Free Trade Zone: Opportunities for Improvement," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 454-468, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:7674-7684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.