IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3419-d810347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Briquettes from Pinus spp. Residues: Energy Savings and Emissions Mitigation in the Rural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Morales-Máximo

    (Facultad de Ingeniería en Tecnología de la Madera, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edif. D, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia C.P. 58040, Mexico)

  • José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones

    (Facultad de Ingeniería en Tecnología de la Madera, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edif. D, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia C.P. 58040, Mexico)

  • Omar Masera

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Morelia C.P. 58190, Mexico)

  • Víctor Manuel Ruiz-García

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Morelia C.P. 58190, Mexico
    Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 03940, Mexico)

Abstract

This study analyzes the household energy needs of the indigenous community of San Francisco Pichátaro, Michoacán, Mexico, and the use of Pinus spp. wood residues for the production of briquettes. The energy and emission performances of wood briquettes were evaluated on the field and in the laboratory. On-field surveys and measurements show that most users combine the use of fuelwood and LPG for cooking and heating water, and 65% of people use fuelwood daily (40% of houses consumed more than 39 kg per week). The use of biomass waste is an energy option in rural communities and contributes to reducing firewood consumption and mitigating GHGs. Briquettes gasification to heat water reduces 74% of GHG emissions, increases the thermal efficiency by 30%, and reduces pollutant emissions of CO, CH 4 , and PM 2.5 , NMHC, EC, and OC by 50% to 75% compared to a three-stone fire. The use of briquettes on the Patsari stove showed energy savings of 12% and a 36% reduction in CO 2 e compared to the “U” type open fire. The briquettes could reduce the fuelwood consumption by 318 t/year. It is possible to produce briquettes at a cost similar to or cheaper than fuelwood and generate a local market (circular economy) with local benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Morales-Máximo & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones & Omar Masera & Víctor Manuel Ruiz-García, 2022. "Briquettes from Pinus spp. Residues: Energy Savings and Emissions Mitigation in the Rural Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3419-:d:810347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berrueta, Víctor M. & Edwards, Rufus D. & Masera, Omar R., 2008. "Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 859-870.
    2. Robert Bailis & Rudi Drigo & Adrian Ghilardi & Omar Masera, 2015. "The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 266-272, March.
    3. Luis Bernardo López-Sosa & José Núñez-González & Alberto Beltrán & Mario Morales-Máximo & Mario Morales-Sánchez & Montserrat Serrano-Medrano & Carlos A. García, 2019. "A New Methodology for the Development of Appropriate Technology: A Case Study for the Development of a Wood Solar Dryer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingjing Chen & Yangyang Lin & Xiaojun Wang & Bingjing Mao & Lihong Peng, 2022. "Direct and Indirect Carbon Emission from Household Consumption Based on LMDI and SDA Model: A Decomposition and Comparison Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Cindy Nereida Morales-Máximo & Luis Bernardo López-Sosa & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones & Juan Carlos Corral-Huacuz & Arturo Aguilera-Mandujano & Luis Fernando Pintor-Ibarra & Armando López-Miranda , 2022. "Characterization of Agricultural Residues of Zea mays for Their Application as Solid Biofuel: Case Study in San Francisco Pichátaro, Michoacán, Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yabei Zhang, 2022. "Accelerating Access to Clean Cooking Will Require a Heart-Head-and-Hands Approach," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 65(1), pages 59-62, March.
    2. repec:zbw:rwirep:0538 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Simons, Andrew M. & Beltramo, Theresa & Blalock, Garrick & Levine, David I., 2017. "Using unobtrusive sensors to measure and minimize Hawthorne effects: Evidence from cookstoves," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 68-80.
    4. Alina E. Kozhukhova & Stephanus P. du Preez & Dmitri G. Bessarabov, 2021. "Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion for Domestic and Safety Applications: A Critical Review of Catalyst Materials and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Susann Stritzke & Malcolm Bricknell & Matthew Leach & Samir Thapa & Yesmeen Khalifa & Ed Brown, 2023. "Impact Financing for Clean Cooking Energy Transitions: Reviews and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Rose, Julian & Bensch, Gunther & Munyehirwe, Anicet & Peters, Jörg, 2022. "The forgotten coal: Charcoal demand in sub-Saharan Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    7. Khandelwal, Meena & Hill, Matthew E. & Greenough, Paul & Anthony, Jerry & Quill, Misha & Linderman, Marc & Udaykumar, H.S., 2017. "Why Have Improved Cook-Stove Initiatives in India Failed?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 13-27.
    8. Elías Hurtado Pérez & Oscar Mulumba Ilunga & David Alfonso Solar & María Cristina Moros Gómez & Paula Bastida-Molina, 2020. "Sustainable Cooking Based on a 3 kW Air-Forced Multifuel Gasification Stove Using Alternative Fuels Obtained from Agricultural Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Bär, Roger & Reinhard, Jürgen & Ehrensperger, Albrecht & Kiteme, Boniface & Mkunda, Thomas & Wymann von Dach, Susanne, 2021. "The future of charcoal, firewood, and biogas in Kitui County and Kilimanjaro Region: Scenario development for policy support," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Elena Ferriz Bosque & Luisa M. Muneta & Gregorio Romero Rey & Berta Suarez & Víctor Berrueta & Alberto Beltrán & Omar Masera, 2021. "Using Design Thinking to Improve Cook Stoves Development in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Faraz Usmani & Marc Jeuland & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, 2018. "NGOs and the effectiveness of interventions," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-59, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Gunther Bensch & Jörg Peters, 2020. "One‐Off Subsidies and Long‐Run Adoption—Experimental Evidence on Improved Cooking Stoves in Senegal," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 72-90, January.
    13. Shupler, Matthew & O'Keefe, Mark & Puzzolo, Elisa & Nix, Emily & Anderson de Cuevas, Rachel & Mwitari, James & Gohole, Arthur & Sang, Edna & Čukić, Iva & Menya, Diana & Pope, Daniel, 2021. "Pay-as-you-go liquefied petroleum gas supports sustainable clean cooking in Kenyan informal urban settlement during COVID-19 lockdown," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    14. Mutanga, Shingirirai S. & Quitzow, Rainer & Steckel, Jan Christoph, 2018. "Tackling energy, climate and development challenges in Africa," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-14.
    15. Raman, P. & Ram, N.K. & Murali, J., 2014. "Improved test method for evaluation of bio-mass cook-stoves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 479-495.
    16. Shafiqa Keddar & Scott Strachan & Stuart Galloway, 2022. "A Smart eCook Battery-Charging System to Maximize Electric Cooking Capacity on a Hybrid PV/Diesel Mini-Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Victor M. Berrueta & Montserrat Serrano-Medrano & Carlos García-Bustamante & Marta Astier & Omar R. Masera, 2017. "Promoting sustainable local development of rural communities and mitigating climate change: the case of Mexico’s Patsari improved cookstove project," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 63-77, January.
    18. Grimm, Michael & Peters, Jörg, 2014. "Beer, Wood, and Welfare," IZA Discussion Papers 8719, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
      • Grimm, Michael & Peters, Jörg, 2015. "Beer, Wood, and Welfare," Ruhr Economic Papers 538, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    19. Jeuland, Marc & Desai, Manish A. & Bair, Elizabeth F. & Mohideen Abdul Cader, Nafeesa & Natesan, Durairaj & Isaac, Wilson Jayakaran & Sambandam, Sankar & Balakrishnan, Kalpana & Thangavel, Gurusamy & , 2023. "A randomized trial of price subsidies for liquefied petroleum cooking gas among low-income households in rural India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    20. Lenz, Luciane & Bensch, Gunther & Chartier, Ryan & Kane, Moustapha & Peters, Jörg & Jeuland, Marc, 2022. "Releasing the killer from the kitchen? Ventilation and air pollution from biomass cooking," Ruhr Economic Papers 967, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    21. Enrique Cabello-Vargas & Azucena Escobedo-Izquierdo & Arturo Morales-Acevedo, 2021. "Review on Rural Energy Access Policies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 157-171.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3419-:d:810347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.