IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1751-d759624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Ostasz

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Dominika Siwiec

    (Department of Manufacturing Processes and Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Department of Manufacturing Processes and Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Improving the quality of products remains a challenge. This is due to the turbulent environment and the dynamics of changing customer requirements. Hence, the key action is to predict beneficial changes in products, which will allow one to achieve customer satisfaction and reduce the waste of resources. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to develop a universal model to predict the expected direction of quality improvement. Initially, the purpose of the research was determined by using the SMART(-ER) method. Then, during the brainstorming method (BM), the product criteria and range states of these criteria were determined. Next, a survey with the Likert scale was used to obtain customers’ expectations, i.e., assessing the importance of criteria and customers’ satisfaction with ranges of product criteria states. Based on customer assessments, quality product levels were calculated using the Weighted Sum Model (WSM). Then, the initial customer satisfaction from the product quality level was identified according to the relative state’s scale. Based on this, the direction of product quality improvement was anticipated using the Naïve Bayesian Classifier (NBC). A test of the model was carried out for photovoltaic panels (PV) of a key EU producer. However, the proposed model is universal, because it can be used by any entity to predict the direction of improvement of any kind of product. The originality of this model allows the prediction of the destination of product improvement according to customers’ assessments for weights of criteria and satisfaction from ranges of quality-criterion states.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1751-:d:759624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alonso Gutiérrez Galeano & Michael Bressan & Fernando Jiménez Vargas & Corinne Alonso, 2018. "Shading Ratio Impact on Photovoltaic Modules and Correlation with Shading Patterns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    3. George Stamatellos & Olympia Zogou & Anastassios Stamatelos, 2021. "Energy Performance Optimization of a House with Grid-Connected Rooftop PV Installation and Air Source Heat Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Alvaro Quiles Garcia & Naoya Nishiumi & Atsushi Saito & Eriko Matsumura & Jiro Senda, 2021. "Economic, Environmental and Energetic Analysis of a Distributed Generation System Composed by Waste Gasification and Photovoltaic Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Núria Sánchez-Pantoja & Rosario Vidal & M. Carmen Pastor, 2021. "EU-Funded Projects with Actual Implementation of Renewable Energies in Cities. Analysis of Their Concern for Aesthetic Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Jacek Kusznier & Wojciech Wojtkowski, 2021. "IoT Solutions for Maintenance and Evaluation of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Aditya Pandey & Pramod Pandey & Jaya Shankar Tumuluru, 2022. "Solar Energy Production in India and Commonly Used Technologies—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    9. Guglielmina Mutani & Valeria Todeschi, 2021. "Optimization of Costs and Self-Sufficiency for Roof Integrated Photovoltaic Technologies on Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Sánchez-Pantoja, Núria & Vidal, Rosario & Pastor, M. Carmen, 2018. "Aesthetic impact of solar energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 227-238.
    11. Claude Ziad El-Bayeh & Mohamed Zellagui & Navid Shirzadi & Ursula Eicker, 2021. "A Novel Optimization Algorithm for Solar Panels Selection towards a Self-Powered EV Parking Lot and Its Impact on the Distribution System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Idris Al Siyabi & Arwa Al Mayasi & Aiman Al Shukaili & Sourav Khanna, 2021. "Effect of Soiling on Solar Photovoltaic Performance under Desert Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Gabriel López & Diego Ramírez & Joaquín Alonso-Montesinos & Juan Sarmiento & Jesús Polo & Nuria Martín-Chivelet & Aitor Marzo & Francisco Javier Batlles & Pablo Ferrada, 2021. "Design of a Low-Cost Multiplexer for the Study of the Impact of Soiling on PV Panel Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Tito G. Amaral & Vitor Fernão Pires & Armando J. Pires, 2021. "Fault Detection in PV Tracking Systems Using an Image Processing Algorithm Based on PCA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Seyed Abbas Mousavi Maleki & H. Hizam & Chandima Gomes, 2017. "Estimation of Hourly, Daily and Monthly Global Solar Radiation on Inclined Surfaces: Models Re-Visited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Yongshi Jie & Xianhua Ji & Anzhi Yue & Jingbo Chen & Yupeng Deng & Jing Chen & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Combined Multi-Layer Feature Fusion and Edge Detection Method for Distributed Photovoltaic Power Station Identification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Khlid Ben Hamad & Doudou N. Luta & Atanda K. Raji, 2021. "A Grid-Tied Fuel Cell Multilevel Inverter with Low Harmonic Distortions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    21. Dorian Esteban Guzman Razo & Björn Müller & Henrik Madsen & Christof Wittwer, 2020. "A Genetic Algorithm Approach as a Self-Learning and Optimization Tool for PV Power Simulation and Digital Twinning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    22. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski, 2022. "On the Assessment of e-Banking Websites Supporting Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    23. Ana Cristina Ferreira & Angela Silva & José Carlos Teixeira & Senhorinha Teixeira, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Solar Thermal Systems Applied to Portuguese Dwellings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    24. Ali Shaito & Mohammad Hammoud & Fadel Kawtharani & Ali Kawtharani & Hilal Reda, 2021. "Power Enhancement of a PV Module Using Different Types of Phase Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    25. Nam Hoai Tran & Shih-Hsien Yang & Calista Y. Tsai & Nien Chia Yang & Chih-Ming Chang, 2021. "Developing Transportation Livability-Related Indicators for Green Urban Road Rating System in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    26. Sanyang Liu & Mingmin Zhu & Youlong Yang, 2013. "A Bayesian Classifier Learning Algorithm Based on Optimization Model," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, February.
    27. D. P. N. Nguyen & Johan Lauwaert, 2020. "Calculating the Energy Yield of Si-Based Solar Cells for Belgium and Vietnam Regions at Arbitrary Tilt and Orientation under Actual Weather Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    28. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    29. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    30. Arsalan Ahmed Othman & Ahmed K. Obaid & Diary Ali Mohammed Al-Manmi & Mohammad Pirouei & Sarkawt Ghazi Salar & Veraldo Liesenberg & Ahmed F. Al-Maamar & Ahmed T. Shihab & Younus I. Al-Saady & Zaid T. , 2021. "Insights for Landfill Site Selection Using GIS: A Case Study in the Tanjero River Basin, Kurdistan Region, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
    31. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    32. Ramez Abdallah & Emad Natsheh & Adel Juaidi & Sufyan Samara & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2020. "A Multi-Level World Comprehensive Neural Network Model for Maximum Annual Solar Irradiation on a Flat Surface," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "Sustainable Vehicle Design Considering Quality Level and Life Cycle Environmental Assessment (LCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Jacek Kusznier, 2023. "Influence of Environmental Factors on the Intelligent Management of Photovoltaic and Wind Sections in a Hybrid Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Kesra Nermend, 2022. "Energy Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Tools—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-5, July.
    10. Harsha Cheemakurthy & Karl Garme, 2022. "Fuzzy AHP-Based Design Performance Index for Evaluation of Ferries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednarova & Marian Sofranko & Olga Vegsoova & Martin Cvoliga, 2021. "Influence of Natural Aggregate Crushing Process on Crushing Strength Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Tomáš Bakalár & Henrieta Pavolová & Zuzana Šimková & Lucia Bednárová, 2022. "Phosphorus Management in Slovakia—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    13. B. Kirubakaran & M. Ilangkumaran, 2016. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 285-313, October.
    14. Paweł Ziemba, 2023. "Selection of Photovoltaic Panels Based on Ranges of Criteria Weights and Balanced Assessment Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    16. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    17. Thi Thu Em Vo & Seung-Mo Je & Se-Hoon Jung & Jaehyeon Choi & Jun-Ho Huh & Han-Jong Ko, 2022. "Review of Photovoltaic Power and Aquaculture in Desert," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    19. Qiucheng Li & Jiang Hu & Bolin Yu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Mechanism of Urban Residential Energy Consumption in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1751-:d:759624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.