IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2474-d1088284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Siwiec

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Gazda

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

The idea of sustainable development (SD) forces companies to combine the quality development of products with the simultaneous care of the natural environment. These actions should start with the product design process. The aim of the study was to create a modified method of Quality Function Development (QFD-CE), which will support the design of new products or improve the existing products on the market. In the proposed method (QFD-CE), the method integrates techniques such as: SMARTER method, brainstorming (BM), the method of selecting a team of experts, kinship diagram, fixed sum scale, and Likert scale. A novelty compared to the traditional QFD methodology is that design goals are set not only based on customer expectations, but also considering the impact on the natural environment. The originality of this proposition comes to the practical inclusion of including sustainability development criteria. The proposed method can be used in companies that design new products and are focused on caring for the natural environment. The QFD-CE method test method was performed for photovoltaic panels (PV). As part of the proposed QFD-CE method, the sequence of design activities was determined so that they meet customer expectations and can be simultaneously implemented according to the idea of SD. This method can be used for any product, mainly those that have a significant impact on the natural environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2474-:d:1088284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Faustino Alarcón & Pascual Cortés-Pellicer & David Pérez-Perales & Raquel Sanchis, 2020. "Sustainability vs. Circular Economy from a Disposition Decision Perspective: A Proposal of a Methodology and an Applied Example in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Omid Zabihi & Mojtaba Ahmadi & Chao Liu & Roya Mahmoodi & Quanxiang Li & Mahmoud Reza Ghandehari Ferdowsi & Minoo Naebe, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach to the Low-Cost Recycling of Waste Glass Fibres Composites towards Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Malgorzata Koszewska & Maciej Bielecki, 2020. "How to make furniture industry more circular? The role of component standardisation in ready-to-assemble furniture," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1688-1707, March.
    5. Aleksandra Ziemińska-Stolarska & Monika Pietrzak & Ireneusz Zbiciński, 2021. "Application of LCA to Determine Environmental Impact of Concentrated Photovoltaic Solar Panels—State-of-the-Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Sabina Scarpellini & Luz María Marín-Vinuesa & Alfonso Aranda-Usón & Pilar Portillo-Tarragona, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(7), pages 1129-1158, January.
    7. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2022. "Problems, Needs, and Challenges of a Sustainability-Based Production Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Alfonso Aranda-Usón & Pilar Portillo-Tarragona & Luz María Marín-Vinuesa & Sabina Scarpellini, 2019. "Financial Resources for the Circular Economy: A Perspective from Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Yuri Borgianni & Lorenzo Maccioni & Anton Dignös & Demis Basso, 2022. "A Framework to Evaluate Areas of Interest for Sustainable Products and Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Nina Boorsma & Esra Polat & Conny Bakker & David Peck & Ruud Balkenende, 2022. "Development of the Circular Product Readiness Method in Circular Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    12. Vittorio Serra & Antonio Ledda & Maria Grazia Gavina Ruiu & Giovanna Calia & Andrea De Montis, 2022. "Integrating Adaptation to Climate Change into Sustainable Development Policy and Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Darren D. Lee & Robert W. Faff & Kim Langfield-Smith, 2009. "Revisiting the Vexing Question: Does Superior Corporate Social Performance Lead to Improved Financial Performance?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 34(1), pages 21-49, June.
    14. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Cheng Siew Goh & Heap-Yih Chong, 2023. "Opportunities in the Sustainable Built Environment: Perspectives on Human-Centric Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-8, January.
    17. Fabio Neves Puglieri & Aldo Roberto Ometto & Rodrigo Salvador & Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Izabella Morré Rodrigues & Octavio Diegoli Netto, 2020. "An Environmental and Operational Analysis of Quality Function Deployment-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Jain, Suresh & Sharma, Tanya & Gupta, Anil Kumar, 2022. "End-of-life management of solar PV waste in India: Situation analysis and proposed policy framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    21. Daniel Guzzo & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Marcia Echeveste & Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos Costa, 2019. "Circular Innovation Framework: Verifying Conceptual to Practical Decisions in Sustainability-Oriented Product-Service System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, June.
    22. Zhang, Min & Sun, Lin & Wang, G. Alan & Li, Yuzhuo & He, Shuguang, 2022. "Using neutral sentiment reviews to improve customer requirement identification and product design strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    23. Yongshi Jie & Xianhua Ji & Anzhi Yue & Jingbo Chen & Yupeng Deng & Jing Chen & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Combined Multi-Layer Feature Fusion and Edge Detection Method for Distributed Photovoltaic Power Station Identification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    24. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednárová, 2020. "Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    25. Małgorzata Bogusz & Renata Matysik-Pejas & Andrzej Krasnodębski & Paweł Dziekański, 2021. "The Concept of Zero Waste in the Context of Supporting Environmental Protection by Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    26. Anna Manuella Melo Nunes & Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior & Raphael Abrahão & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Flávio José Simioni & Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha, 2023. "Public Policies for Renewable Energy: A Review of the Perspectives for a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, January.
    27. Iliana Papamichael & Irene Voukkali & Mejdi Jeguirim & Nikolaos Argirusis & Salah Jellali & Georgia Sourkouni & Christos Argirusis & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2022. "End-of-Life Management and Recycling on PV Solar Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-5, September.
    28. Inès Tunga & Anna Garcia-Teruel & Donald R. Noble & Jillian Henderson, 2021. "Addressing European Ocean Energy Challenge: The DTOceanPlus Structured Innovation Tool for Concept Creation and Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    29. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    30. Kieran Campbell-Johnston & Martin Calisto Friant & Kaustubh Thapa & Dirkjan Lakerveld & Walter J V Vermeulen, 2020. "How circular is your tyre: Experiences with extended producer responsibility from a circular economy perspective," Post-Print hal-02883432, HAL.
    31. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2021. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems Customization: A Case Study Research in the Medical Equipment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    32. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    33. Yongchuan Li & Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2022. "QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    34. Eng Wolniak & A. Sȩdek, 2009. "Using QFD method for the ecological designing of products and services," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 695-701, July.
    35. Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan & Hao, Gang & Yan, Hong & Yasmeen, Rizwana & Padda, Ihtsham Ul Haq & Ullah, Assad, 2022. "The impact of trade, financial development and government integrity on energy efficiency: An analysis from G7-Countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    36. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednarova & Marian Sofranko & Olga Vegsoova & Martin Cvoliga, 2021. "Influence of Natural Aggregate Crushing Process on Crushing Strength Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Kesra Nermend, 2022. "Energy Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Tools—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-5, July.
    12. Harsha Cheemakurthy & Karl Garme, 2022. "Fuzzy AHP-Based Design Performance Index for Evaluation of Ferries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. B. Kirubakaran & M. Ilangkumaran, 2016. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 285-313, October.
    14. Beatriz de Souza Mello Gonçalves & Flávio Leonel de Carvalho & Paula de Camargo Fiorini, 2022. "Circular Economy and Financial Aspects: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-41, March.
    15. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2022. "An Econometric Model of the Operation of the Steel Industry in POLAND in the Context of Process Heat and Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    17. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    18. Qiucheng Li & Jiang Hu & Bolin Yu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Mechanism of Urban Residential Energy Consumption in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Managi, Shunsuke & Okimoto, Tatsuyoshi & Matsuda, Akimi, 2012. "Do Socially Responsible Investment Indexes Outperform Conventional Indexes?," MPRA Paper 36662, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Enhance environmental commitments and green intangible assets toward green competitive advantages: an analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 529-543, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2474-:d:1088284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.