IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3430-d1633151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle-Based Product Sustainability Assessment Employing Quality and Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Siwiec

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Current issues in sustainable development concern research on comprehensiveness, coherence and practicality. Therefore, the objective was to develop and test a novelty approach to product sustainability assessment based on life cycle, quality, and costs. This approach extends the iterative design thinking process (DT), including overcoming the limitations of existing LCSA methods. We present a systematic process for obtaining and processing customer requirements with a survey and Pareto–Lorenz analysis. Then, using an algorithm developed in Matlab R2021a program, we generated product prototypes considering the key criteria presented in various dimensions of current and modified states. Next, we propose the modeling of prospective LCA for all prototypes in the OpenLCA program with Ecoinvent database. Finally, we aggregated the results considering the cost of prototypes in environmental–cost analysis to determine the direction of product sustainability. We tested this approach in detail with the example of vacuum cleaners for domestic and commercial use. After a literature review and survey research in customers, we developed 54 prototypes, where the modified key quality criteria were as follows: vacuum in the suction pipe, engine power, operating range, and length of the power cable. Using this approach, it was possible to select six prototypes that best meet customer requirements, are environmentally friendly, and cost-effective. Finally, we discuss contributions to DT and LCSA methodologies, and propose future directions for development within the application of artificial intelligence (AI). This approach can be a practical application in SMEs already in the early stages of product development (conceptualization), where access to detailed data is limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2025. "Life Cycle-Based Product Sustainability Assessment Employing Quality and Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3430-:d:1633151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nakata, Cheryl, 2020. "Design thinking for innovation: Considering distinctions, fit, and use in firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 763-772.
    2. Nicolas Rösch & Victor Tiberius & Sascha Kraus, 2023. "Design thinking for innovation: context factors, process, and outcomes," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 160-176, March.
    3. Somayeh Rezaei Kalvani & Amir Hamzah Sharaai & Ibrahim Kabir Abdullahi, 2021. "Social Consideration in Product Life Cycle for Product Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Wen-Tao Li & Ming-Chyuan Ho & Chun Yang, 2019. "A Design Thinking-Based Study of the Prospect of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednárová, 2020. "Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Julian Grenz & Moritz Ostermann & Karoline Käsewieter & Felipe Cerdas & Thorsten Marten & Christoph Herrmann & Thomas Tröster, 2023. "Integrating Prospective LCA in the Development of Automotive Components," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Marianna Lena Kambanou, 2020. "Life Cycle Costing: Understanding How It Is Practised and Its Relationship to Life Cycle Management—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Xue Gong & Zhuen Guo & Zhongqu Xie, 2022. "Using Kansei Engineering for the Design Thinking Framework: Bamboo Pen Holder Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Rickard Arvidsson & Anne‐Marie Tillman & Björn A. Sandén & Matty Janssen & Anders Nordelöf & Duncan Kushnir & Sverker Molander, 2018. "Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1286-1294, December.
    12. Anna Luthin & Marzia Traverso & Robert H. Crawford, 2024. "Circular life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrated framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 41-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2024. "Decision-Making Model Supporting Eco-Innovation in Energy Production Based on Quality, Cost and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednarova & Marian Sofranko & Olga Vegsoova & Martin Cvoliga, 2021. "Influence of Natural Aggregate Crushing Process on Crushing Strength Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2024. "Eco-Innovation Method for Sustainable Development of Energy-Producing Products Considering Quality and Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "Sustainable Vehicle Design Considering Quality Level and Life Cycle Environmental Assessment (LCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    10. Dominika Siwiec & Wiesław Frącz & Andrzej Pacana & Grzegorz Janowski & Łukasz Bąk, 2024. "Analysis of the Ecological Footprint from the Extraction and Processing of Materials in the LCA Phase of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Mélanie Douziech & Romain Besseau & Raphaël Jolivet & Bianka Shoai‐Tehrani & Jean‐Yves Bourmaud & Guillaume Busato & Mathilde Gresset‐Bourgeois & Paula Pérez‐López, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of prospective trajectories: A parametric approach for tailor‐made inventories and its computational implementation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 25-40, February.
    12. Johannes Morfeldt & Daniel J. A. Johansson, 2022. "Impacts of shared mobility on vehicle lifetimes and on the carbon footprint of electric vehicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Norliyana Md. Aris & Nor Hasniza Ibrahim & Noor Dayana Abdul Halim & Nadzimah Idris, 2025. "Mapping Innovation in Chemistry Education: Expert Insights on Innovation Competence and Learning Environments," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 1525-1535, January.
    15. Anna Furberg & Rickard Arvidsson & Sverker Molander, 2022. "A practice‐based framework for defining functional units in comparative life cycle assessments of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 718-730, June.
    16. Jingjing Liu & Hanchao Liu & Yun Liu, 2025. "A Sustainability-Oriented Framework for Life Cycle Environmental Cost Accounting and Carbon Financial Optimization in Prefabricated Steel Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Carlos Pablo Sigüenza & Bernhard Steubing & Arnold Tukker & Glenn A. Aguilar‐Hernández, 2021. "The environmental and material implications of circular transitions: A diffusion and product‐life‐cycle‐based modeling framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 563-579, June.
    18. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Kjersti Wergeland Krakhella & Marjorie Morales & Robert Bock & Frode Seland & Odne Stokke Burheim & Kristian Etienne Einarsrud, 2020. "Electrodialytic Energy Storage System: Permselectivity, Stack Measurements and Life-Cycle Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Xinya You, 2025. "Management as a design practice: a multi-case study on designing value co-creation mechanisms," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3430-:d:1633151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.