IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i5p1247-d329820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electrodialytic Energy Storage System: Permselectivity, Stack Measurements and Life-Cycle Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kjersti Wergeland Krakhella

    (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Marjorie Morales

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
    INRIA BIOCORE, BP 93, CEDEX 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France)

  • Robert Bock

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Frode Seland

    (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Odne Stokke Burheim

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Kristian Etienne Einarsrud

    (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Reverse electrodialysis and electrodialysis can be combined into a closed energy storage system, allowing for storing surplus energy through a salinity difference between two solutions. A closed system benefits from simple temperature control, the ability to use higher salt concentrations and mitigation of membrane fouling. In this work, the permselectivity of two membranes from Fumatech, FAS-50 and FKS-50, is found to be ranging from 0.7 to 0.5 and from 0.8 to 0.7 respectively. The maximum unit cell open-circuit voltage was measured to be 115 ± 9 mV and 118 ± 8 mV at 25 ° C and 40 ° C, respectively, and the power density was found to be 1.5 ± 0.2 W m uc − 2 at 25 ° C and 2.0 ± 0.3 W m uc − 2 at 40 ° C. Given a lifetime of 10 years, three hours of operation per day and 3% downtime, the membrane price can be 2.5 ± 0.3 $ m − 2 and 1.4 ± 0.2 $ m − 2 to match the energy price in the EU and the USA, respectively. A life-cycle analysis was conducted for a storage capacity of 1 GWh and 2 h of discharging. The global warming impact is 4.53 · 10 5 kg CO 2 equivalents/MWh and the cumulative energy demand is 1.61 · 10 3 MWh/MWh, which are 30% and 2 times higher than a lithium-ion battery pack with equivalent capacity, respectively. An electrodialytic energy storage system reaches a comparable global warming impact and a lower cumulative energy demand than a lithium-ion battery for an average life span of 20 and 3 years, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjersti Wergeland Krakhella & Marjorie Morales & Robert Bock & Frode Seland & Odne Stokke Burheim & Kristian Etienne Einarsrud, 2020. "Electrodialytic Energy Storage System: Permselectivity, Stack Measurements and Life-Cycle Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1247-:d:329820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kjersti Wergeland Krakhella & Robert Bock & Odne Stokke Burheim & Frode Seland & Kristian Etienne Einarsrud, 2019. "Heat to H 2 : Using Waste Heat for Hydrogen Production through Reverse Electrodialysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Vermaas, David A. & Herber, Rien & Nijmeijer, Kitty, 2014. "Experimentally obtainable energy from mixing river water, seawater or brines with reverse electrodialysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 123-131.
    3. Rickard Arvidsson & Anne‐Marie Tillman & Björn A. Sandén & Matty Janssen & Anders Nordelöf & Duncan Kushnir & Sverker Molander, 2018. "Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1286-1294, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon B. B. Solberg & Pauline Zimmermann & Øivind Wilhelmsen & Jacob J. Lamb & Robert Bock & Odne S. Burheim, 2022. "Heat to Hydrogen by Reverse Electrodialysis—Using a Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Model to Evaluate Hydrogen Production Concepts Utilising Waste Heat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Robert Bock & Björn Kleinsteinberg & Bjørn Selnes-Volseth & Odne Stokke Burheim, 2021. "A Novel Iron Chloride Red-Ox Concentration Flow Cell Battery (ICFB) Concept; Power and Electrode Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Soo-Jin Han & Jin-Soo Park, 2021. "Understanding Membrane Fouling in Electrically Driven Energy Conversion Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Cemal Benim & Björn Pfeiffelmann, 2019. "Comparison of Combustion Models for Lifted Hydrogen Flames within RANS Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Mélanie Douziech & Romain Besseau & Raphaël Jolivet & Bianka Shoai‐Tehrani & Jean‐Yves Bourmaud & Guillaume Busato & Mathilde Gresset‐Bourgeois & Paula Pérez‐López, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of prospective trajectories: A parametric approach for tailor‐made inventories and its computational implementation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 25-40, February.
    3. Johannes Morfeldt & Daniel J. A. Johansson, 2022. "Impacts of shared mobility on vehicle lifetimes and on the carbon footprint of electric vehicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Anna Furberg & Rickard Arvidsson & Sverker Molander, 2022. "A practice‐based framework for defining functional units in comparative life cycle assessments of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 718-730, June.
    5. Carlos Pablo Sigüenza & Bernhard Steubing & Arnold Tukker & Glenn A. Aguilar‐Hernández, 2021. "The environmental and material implications of circular transitions: A diffusion and product‐life‐cycle‐based modeling framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 563-579, June.
    6. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Mai, Van-Phung & Yang, Ruey-Jen, 2020. "Boosting power generation from salinity gradient on high-density nanoporous membrane using thermal effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    8. Sanna Wickerts & Rickard Arvidsson & Anders Nordelöf & Magdalena Svanström & Patrik Johansson, 2024. "Prospective life cycle assessment of sodium‐ion batteries made from abundant elements," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 116-129, February.
    9. Andrea Zaffora & Andrea Culcasi & Luigi Gurreri & Alessandro Cosenza & Alessandro Tamburini & Monica Santamaria & Giorgio Micale, 2020. "Energy Harvesting by Waste Acid/Base Neutralization via Bipolar Membrane Reverse Electrodialysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Chen, Man & Mei, Ying & Yu, Yuqing & Zeng, Raymond Jianxiong & Zhang, Fang & Zhou, Shungui & Tang, Chuyang Y., 2019. "An internal-integrated RED/ED system for energy-saving seawater desalination: A model study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 139-148.
    11. Porcelli, Roberto & Gibon, Thomas & Marazza, Diego & Righi, Serena & Rugani, Benedetto, 2023. "Prospective environmental impact assessment and simulation applied to an emerging biowaste-based energy technology in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Karla G. Morrissey & Leah English & Greg Thoma & Jennie Popp, 2022. "Prospective Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of Novel Electrochemical Struvite Recovery in a U.S. Wastewater Treatment Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Sumina Namboorimadathil Backer & Ines Bouaziz & Nabeela Kallayi & Reny Thankam Thomas & Gopika Preethikumar & Mohd Sobri Takriff & Tahar Laoui & Muataz Ali Atieh, 2022. "Review: Brine Solution: Current Status, Future Management and Technology Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-47, May.
    14. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Pillay, Pragasen & Laflamme, Claude B., 2015. "Osmotic power potential in remote regions of Quebec," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 62-70.
    15. Johanna Olofsson, 2021. "Time-Dependent Climate Impact of Utilizing Residual Biomass for Biofuels—The Combined Influence of Modelling Choices and Climate Impact Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Elyasigomari, Vahid & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2016. "Evaluation of the detrimental effects in osmotic power assisted reverse osmosis (RO) desalination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 608-619.
    18. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Simon B. B. Solberg & Pauline Zimmermann & Øivind Wilhelmsen & Jacob J. Lamb & Robert Bock & Odne S. Burheim, 2022. "Heat to Hydrogen by Reverse Electrodialysis—Using a Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Model to Evaluate Hydrogen Production Concepts Utilising Waste Heat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Sacchi, R. & Terlouw, T. & Siala, K. & Dirnaichner, A. & Bauer, C. & Cox, B. & Mutel, C. & Daioglou, V. & Luderer, G., 2022. "PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): A streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment using integrated assessment models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1247-:d:329820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.