IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4378-d1157826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ulewicz

    (Department of Production Engineering and Safety, Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Dominika Siwiec

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pacana

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

The idea of sustainable development enforces the pro-environmental design and production of products. It also refers to products producing green energy. The current situation in the world, mainly in Europe, further intensifies these works. The new products occurring in this dynamic market are rarely known by customers. In such a case, they have the problem of proper selection based on their own needs. Hence, the purpose is to develop a method to support the customers during their choice of product. In this methodical study, the qualitative and environmental criteria and also price of purchase were simultaneously included. This method was developed using integrated selected techniques, e.g., brainstorming (BM), the SMARTER method, rule 7 ± 2, questionnaire with Likert scale, AHP method, PROMETHEE II method, and matrix data analysis. The results from the test of method allowed the development this method for possible selection of a product according to individual customer expectations but also supported by the knowledge and experience of experts. The method is dedicated to customers but also enterprises aspiring to simultaneously develop their own products. The originality of this work is the integration of the main criteria for the selection of the product by the customer, i.e., quality, impact on natural environment, and price. The novelty of the study is the ranking of selecting products by considering qualitative and environmental criteria, limiting the customer’s necessary knowledge about the analyzed products to determine the weights of criteria, and visualization of the qualitative–environmental relationship. The model test was carried out for popular solar collectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4378-:d:1157826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    2. Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Alan Meier & Lourdes Dorantes & Jorge Omar Sandoval & Javier Palma & Arturo Molina, 2022. "S4 Framework for the Integration of Solar Energy Systems in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Companies in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Idris Al Siyabi & Arwa Al Mayasi & Aiman Al Shukaili & Sourav Khanna, 2021. "Effect of Soiling on Solar Photovoltaic Performance under Desert Climatic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Kaya, Tolga & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2010. "Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2517-2527.
    8. Tito G. Amaral & Vitor Fernão Pires & Armando J. Pires, 2021. "Fault Detection in PV Tracking Systems Using an Image Processing Algorithm Based on PCA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Aleksandra Kuzior & Alla Lobanova & Liudmyla Kalashnikova, 2021. "Green Energy in Ukraine: State, Public Demands, and Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Shih-Che Lo, 2022. "A Particle Swarm Optimization Approach to Solve the Vehicle Routing Problem with Cross-Docking and Carbon Emissions Reduction in Logistics Management," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Manuela Ingaldi & Robert Ulewicz, 2019. "How to Make E-Commerce More Successful by Use of Kano’s Model to Assess Customer Satisfaction in Terms of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Chiranjib Bhowmik & Sumit Bhowmik & Amitava Ray, 2021. "Selection of optimum green energy sources by considering environmental constructs and their technical criteria: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13890-13918, September.
    14. Welzel, Fynn & Klinck, Carl-Friedrich & Pohlmann, Yannick & Bednarczyk, Mats, 2021. "Grid and user-optimized planning of charging processes of an electric vehicle fleet using a quantitative optimization model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    15. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednárová, 2020. "Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Jose A. García-Martínez & Ana Meca & G. Alexander Vergara, 2022. "Cooperative Purchasing with General Discount: A Game Theoretical Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Schipfer, F. & Mäki, E. & Schmieder, U. & Lange, N. & Schildhauer, T. & Hennig, C. & Thrän, D., 2022. "Status of and expectations for flexible bioenergy to support resource efficiency and to accelerate the energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Hoang Vu & Ngoc Hai Vu & Seoyong Shin, 2022. "Static Concentrator Photovoltaics Module for Electric Vehicle Applications Based on Compound Parabolic Concentrator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-10, September.
    19. Burnett, Dougal & Barbour, Edward & Harrison, Gareth P., 2014. "The UK solar energy resource and the impact of climate change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 333-343.
    20. Sebastjan Lazar & Vojko Potočan & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2022. "Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, September.
    21. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    22. Lan, Jing & Khan, Sufyan Ullah & Sadiq, Muhammad & Chien, Fengsheng & Baloch, Zulfiqar Ali, 2022. "Evaluating energy poverty and its effects using multi-dimensional based DEA-like mathematical composite indicator approach: Findings from Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    23. Andrzej Poszewiecki & Joanna Czerepko, 2022. "New Trends in Consumption in Poland as Shown by the Example of a Freeshop Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    24. Anjali Singh & Anjana Gupta & Aparna Mehra, 2021. "Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 160-180, March.
    25. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tadeusz Olejarz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Method of Qualitative–Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Model to Determine the Best Modifications of Products with Consideration Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec, 2022. "Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Lucia Bednarova & Marian Sofranko & Olga Vegsoova & Martin Cvoliga, 2021. "Influence of Natural Aggregate Crushing Process on Crushing Strength Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "Sustainable Vehicle Design Considering Quality Level and Life Cycle Environmental Assessment (LCA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Kesra Nermend, 2022. "Energy Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Tools—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-5, July.
    12. Paweł Ziemba, 2019. "Inter-Criteria Dependencies-Based Decision Support in the Sustainable wind Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-29, February.
    13. Remigiusz Gawlik & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2024. "Quality–Cost–Environment Assessment of Sustainable Manufacturing of Photovoltaic Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Tomáš Bakalár & Henrieta Pavolová & Zuzana Šimková & Lucia Bednárová, 2022. "Phosphorus Management in Slovakia—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2022. "An Econometric Model of the Operation of the Steel Industry in POLAND in the Context of Process Heat and Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Kurka, Thomas, 2013. "Application of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the regional sustainability of bioenergy developments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 393-402.
    17. Qiucheng Li & Jiang Hu & Bolin Yu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Mechanism of Urban Residential Energy Consumption in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Amina Tahri & Mohsine Bouya & Mokhtar Ghazouani & Ouafae Achak & Tarik Chafik & Khalid El Azdi & Sanae Boughanbour, 2022. "Impact of Solar Energy Integration on the Rheological and Chemical Properties of Bitumen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    20. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4378-:d:1157826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.