IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6375-d650378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transaction Cost and Agency Perspectives on Eco-Certification of Existing Buildings: A Study of Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yung Yau

    (Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Institute of Policy Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Huiying (Cynthia) Hou

    (Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Ka Chi Yip

    (Institute of Policy Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Queena Kun Qian

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Eco-certification schemes are usually launched with various incentives provided by local governments to facilitate green building development and building energy retrofits. A number of barriers to building energy retrofitting have been identified in previous literature, while the barriers to the eco-certification of existing buildings are under-researched. Drawing on a set of building data retrievable from the BEAM Society and other sources, we carried out an analysis and found the building energy retrofitting, as well as the certification process, were unwelcomed in multi-owned residential buildings. The identified shortfall is put forward from the perspectives of transaction cost theory and agency theory. The findings reveal that high transaction costs incurred during negotiations and coordination among a large number of co-owners within a typical apartment building can outweigh the benefits of retrofitting and eco-certification. Besides, the remuneration structure of third-party property management agents discourages agents from facilitating co-owners to initiate retrofitting. This study provides significant implications for policymakers to understand the concerns of building owners and managers over the decisions and the processes of both the building energy retrofits and eco-certification. The problems and barriers unveiled in this study will facilitate the refining of current energy efficiency policies and related incentives designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yung Yau & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Ka Chi Yip & Queena Kun Qian, 2021. "Transaction Cost and Agency Perspectives on Eco-Certification of Existing Buildings: A Study of Hong Kong," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6375-:d:650378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olaussen, Jon Olaf & Oust, Are & Solstad, Jan Tore, 2017. "Energy performance certificates – Informing the informed or the indifferent?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 246-254.
    2. Piet Eichholtz & Nils Kok & John M. Quigley, 2013. "The Economics of Green Building," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(1), pages 50-63, March.
    3. Hong, Tianzhen & Piette, Mary Ann & Chen, Yixing & Lee, Sang Hoon & Taylor-Lange, Sarah C. & Zhang, Rongpeng & Sun, Kaiyu & Price, Phillip, 2015. "Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 298-309.
    4. Yueming (Lucy) Qiu & Xin Su & Yi David Wang, 2017. "Factors influencing commercial buildings to obtain green certificates," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(20), pages 1937-1949, April.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    6. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    7. Nils Kok & Piet Eichholtz & John M. Quigley, 2009. "Why Companies Rent Green: CSR and The Role of Real Estate," ERES eres2009_176, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Emanuela Delbufalo, 2018. "Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-72793-6, October.
    9. Lee, Sang Hoon & Hong, Tianzhen & Piette, Mary Ann & Taylor-Lange, Sarah C., 2015. "Energy retrofit analysis toolkits for commercial buildings: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1087-1100.
    10. Weiss, Julika & Dunkelberg, Elisa & Vogelpohl, Thomas, 2012. "Improving policy instruments to better tap into homeowner refurbishment potential: Lessons learned from a case study in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 406-415.
    11. Chai, Kah-Hin & Yeo, Catrina, 2012. "Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach—A conceptual framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 460-472.
    12. Jon Olaf Olaussen & Are Oust & Jan Tore Solstad & Lena Kristiansen, 2019. "Energy Performance Certificates—The Role of the Energy Price," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    14. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2009-176 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hou, Jing & Liu, Yisheng & Wu, Yong & Zhou, Nan & Feng, Wei, 2016. "Comparative study of commercial building energy-efficiency retrofit policies in four pilot cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 204-215.
    16. Wrigley, Koel & Crawford, Robert H., 2017. "Identifying policy solutions for improving the energy efficiency of rental properties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 369-378.
    17. Liang, Xin & Yu, Tao & Hong, Jingke & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping, 2019. "Making incentive policies more effective: An agent-based model for energy-efficiency retrofit in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 177-189.
    18. Moore, John H, 1981. "Agency Costs, Technological Change, and Soviet Central Planning," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 189-214, October.
    19. Ke Fan & Edwin H. W. Chan & C. K. Chau, 2018. "Costs and Benefits of Implementing Green Building Economic Incentives: Case Study of a Gross Floor Area Concession Scheme in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Fan, Ke & Chan, Edwin H.W. & Qian, Queena K., 2018. "Transaction costs (TCs) in green building (GB) incentive schemes: Gross Floor Area (GFA) Concession Scheme in Hong Kong," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 563-573.
    21. Ma, Zhenjun & Wang, Shengwei, 2009. "Building energy research in Hong Kong: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 1870-1883, October.
    22. Emanuela Delbufalo, 2018. "Agency Theory and Sustainability in Global Supply Chain," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain, chapter 0, pages 33-54, Springer.
    23. Friedman, Chanoch & Becker, Nir & Erell, Evyatar, 2014. "Energy retrofit of residential building envelopes in Israel: A cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 183-193.
    24. Nuria Calvo & Flora Calvo, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and multiple agency theory: A case study of internal stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1223-1230, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming-Qiang Huang & Rui-Juan Lin, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Energy-Saving Renovations of Existing Rural Residential Buildings from the Perspective of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    2. Jayesh Kumar, 2003. "Ownership Structure and Corporate Firm Performance," Finance 0304004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    4. Ng, Desmond W. & Salin, Victoria, 2012. "An Institutional Approach to the Examination of Food Safety," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Sybille Sachs & Edwin Rühli & Claude Meier, 2010. "Stakeholder Governance as a Response to Wicked Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 57-64, August.
    6. Diamandescu Andrei & Grigore Maria Zenovia, 2009. "From Contractual Approach Of Firm To Theories Of Knowledge," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 295-301, May.
    7. James J. Chrisman & Kristen Madison & Taewoo Kim, 2021. "A Dynamic Framework of Noneconomic Goals and Inter-Family Agency Complexities in Multi-Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 906-930, July.
    8. Chamorro, Eva & Cámara, Macario, 2016. "Relación de agencia y monopolio. El caso del tabaco en España (1887-1986)," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 132-141.
    9. Roumasset, James A., 1994. "Explaining Diversity In Agricultural Organization: An Agency Perspective," Bulletins 12982, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    10. Styhre Alexander, 2018. "The Making of the Shareholder Primacy Governance Model: Price Theory, the Law and Economics School, and Corporate Law Retrenchment Advocacy," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-31, December.
    11. Alexander Brink, 2010. "Enlightened Corporate Governance: Specific Investments by Employees as Legitimation for Residual Claims," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 641-651, June.
    12. Miguel Alzola, 2018. "Decent Work: The Moral Status of Labor in Human Resource Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 835-853, February.
    13. Rao, Ramesh K.S., 2015. "The public corporation as an intermediary between “Main Street” and “Wall Street”," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 64-82.
    14. Todd A. Finkle, 1998. "The Relationship between Boards of Directors and Initial Public Offerings in the Biotechnology Industry," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(3), pages 5-29, April.
    15. Deniz Köksal & Jochen Strähle, 2021. "Social Sustainability in Fashion Supply Chains—Understanding Social Standard Implementation Failures in Vietnam and Indonesia Using Agency Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-36, February.
    16. Silvia Sacchetti & Carlo Borzaga, 2021. "The foundations of the “public organisation”: governance failure and the problem of external effects," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 731-758, September.
    17. Lešnik, Maja & Premrov, Miroslav & Žegarac Leskovar, Vesna, 2018. "Design parameters of the timber-glass upgrade module and the existing building: Impact on the energy-efficient refurbishment process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1125-1138.
    18. Dumitru-Nicusor CARAUSU, 2015. "Monitor And Control In Companies: An Agency Theory Approach," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 46-60, September.
    19. Jayesh Kumar, 2004. "Does Ownership Structure Influence Firm Value? Evidence from India," Finance 0406008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Liu, Guo & Li, Xiaohu & Tan, Yongtao & Zhang, Guomin, 2020. "Building green retrofit in China: Policies, barriers and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6375-:d:650378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.