IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1015-d861986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Satisfaction in the Food Industry—A Premise for Economic Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Bodescu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Alexandru-Dragoş Robu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Andy Felix Jităreanu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Ioan Puiu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Andrei Mihai Gafencu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Florin Daniel Lipşa

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The greatest challenge for Romania’s food industry is to achieve technical and economic parity with the rest of Europe. Therefore, businesses require productive employees, and labor productivity depends on employee satisfaction. This study’s primary objective was to investigate employee satisfaction in the bakery industry in order to enhance economic performance. This topic is rarely researched, but it is necessary to enhance the economic performance and work processes of this industry. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods were used, including an online questionnaire survey of 254 employees and a focus group meeting with 17 managers from 60 companies in the Northeast and Southeast regions of Romania. Total pay (5.3 points on a 1–7-point scale), amount of work (4.9 points), and number of working hours (4.8 points) were the top motivators. The average weighted value for job satisfaction on a scale of 100 points was 27.4 points. The relationship between labor costs and employee satisfaction was strong. Low levels of satisfaction are costlier for employers than high levels of satisfaction. The originality of this study lies in its determination of how strongly employees perceive each aspect of job satisfaction and its correlation to the economic performance of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Bodescu & Alexandru-Dragoş Robu & Andy Felix Jităreanu & Ioan Puiu & Andrei Mihai Gafencu & Florin Daniel Lipşa, 2022. "Work Satisfaction in the Food Industry—A Premise for Economic Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1015-:d:861986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ion Popa & Simona Catalina Stefan & Catalina Florentina Albu & stefan Catalin Popa & Cristian Vlad, 2020. "The Impact of National Culture on Employees' Attitudes Toward Heavy Work Investment: Comparative Approach Romania vs. Japan," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1014-1014, November.
    2. Federica Origo & Laura Pagani, 2008. "Workplace flexibility and job satisfaction: some evidence from Europe," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 539-566, September.
    3. Malina-Ionela BURLACU & Alexandru BIRSAN, 2016. "The Monthly Salary As A Motivational Factor From The Perpective Of The Degree Of Satisfaction And The Quality Of Life," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 418-427, November.
    4. Maria Saleem & Faisal Qadeer & Faisal Mahmood & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Heesup Han, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Employee Green Behavior: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Bindu Gupta & Sahil Joshi & Mohit Agarwal, 2012. "The Effect of Expected Benefit and Perceived Cost on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Study of IT Employees in India," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 3(1).
    6. Weihui Fu, 2014. "The Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction on Ethical Behavior of Chinese Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 137-144, June.
    7. Mirela CRISTEA & Daniela Emanuela DĂNĂCICĂ & Graţiela Georgiana NOJA, 2021. "Emigration Decision and the Migration Profile of the Unemployed: A Case Study on Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 94-111, June.
    8. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Simona-Andreea Apostu & Andreea Paul & Ionut Casuneanu, 2020. "Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-53, July.
    9. Gheorghe Epuran & Gabriel Bratucu & Oana Barbulescu & Nicoleta Andreea Neacsu & Anca Madar, 2018. "Food Safety and Sustainability ? An Exploratory Approach at the Level of the Romanian Wine Production Companies," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 20(47), pages 151-151, February.
    10. Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Liviu Stelian Begu, 2019. "Youth reservation wages in Romania: are wage expectations realistic?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(14), pages 1157-1161, August.
    11. Michael Rose, 2005. "Job Satisfaction in Britain: Coping with Complexity," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 455-467, September.
    12. Alina Butu & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Steliana Rodino & Ioan-Sebastian Brumă & Lucian Tanasă & Marian Butu, 2019. "The Anthropological Analysis of the Key Determinants on the Purchase Decision Taken by the Romanian Consumers Regarding the Ecological Agroalimentary Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Timpanaro, 2023. "Agricultural Food Marketing, Economics and Policies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-9, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunmin Choe & Yongwon Kim & Sungok Moon, 2022. "The Effect of Labor Flexibility on Financial Performance in Korea: The Moderating Effect of Labor Relations Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Hyo-Sun Jung & Hye-Hyun Yoon, 2021. "Generational Effects of Workplace Flexibility on Work Engagement, Satisfaction, and Commitment in South Korean Deluxe Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Anetta Barska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2020. "E-Consumers and Local Food Products: A Perspective for Developing Online Shopping for Local Goods in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Dawson Chris & Veliziotis Michail & Hopkins Benjamin, 2014. "Assimilation of the migrant work ethic," Working Papers 20141407, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    5. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    6. Sajad Rezaei & Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, 2014. "Examining online channel selection behaviour among social media shoppers: a PLS analysis," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 28-51.
    7. Georgellis, Yannis & Lange, Thomas, 2009. "Are Union Members Happy Workers after All? Evidence from Eastern and Western European Labor Markets," MPRA Paper 17020, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Adoption of Environmental Practices: Exploring Technological- and Human-Resource-Based Contributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    10. Mihee Park & Joonmo Kang, 2017. "Job satisfaction of non-standard workers in Korea: focusing on non-standard workers’ internal and external heterogeneity," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 605-623, August.
    11. Filiz Tabak & Aharon Tziner & Or Shkoler & Edna Rabenu, 2021. "The Complexity of Heavy Work Investment (HWI): A Conceptual Integration and Review of Antecedents, Dimensions, and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Ruixin Su & Bojan Obrenovic & Jianguo Du & Danijela Godinic & Akmal Khudaykulov, 2022. "COVID-19 Pandemic Implications for Corporate Sustainability and Society: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Maria da Conceição Cerdeira & Ilona Kovács, 2008. "Job quality in Europe: the North-South divide," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 4(4), pages 21-47, November.
    14. Emery, Cécile & Booth, Jonathan E. & Michaelides, George & Swaab, Alexander J., 2019. "The importance of being psychologically empowered: buffering the negative effects of employee perceptions of leader-member exchange differentiation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100433, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Anna Lewandowska & Zia Ullah & Fatima Saleh AlDhaen & Esra AlDhaen & Alina Yakymchuk, 2023. "Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    16. C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Michael Neureiter, 2023. "Corporate Purpose and Employee Sustainability Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 963-981, April.
    17. , Le Thanh Tung, 2024. "Impact of relationship quality on customer loyalty: A study in the banking system," OSF Preprints qzpxk, Center for Open Science.
    18. Haile, Getinet Astatike, 2012. "Unhappy working with men? Workplace gender diversity and job-related well-being in Britain," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 329-350.
    19. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Gabriel Vasile Hoha, 2021. "Sustainability in the Case of Small Vegetable Farmers: A Matrix Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-32, September.
    20. Haile, Getinet Astatike, 2009. "Unhappy Working with Men? Workplace Gender Diversity and Employee Job-Related Well-Being in Britain: A WERS2004 Based Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 4077, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1015-:d:861986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.