IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1015-d861986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Satisfaction in the Food Industry—A Premise for Economic Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Bodescu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Alexandru-Dragoş Robu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Andy Felix Jităreanu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Ioan Puiu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Andrei Mihai Gafencu

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

  • Florin Daniel Lipşa

    (Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, University of Life Sciences, M. Sadoveanu Alley, No. 3, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The greatest challenge for Romania’s food industry is to achieve technical and economic parity with the rest of Europe. Therefore, businesses require productive employees, and labor productivity depends on employee satisfaction. This study’s primary objective was to investigate employee satisfaction in the bakery industry in order to enhance economic performance. This topic is rarely researched, but it is necessary to enhance the economic performance and work processes of this industry. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods were used, including an online questionnaire survey of 254 employees and a focus group meeting with 17 managers from 60 companies in the Northeast and Southeast regions of Romania. Total pay (5.3 points on a 1–7-point scale), amount of work (4.9 points), and number of working hours (4.8 points) were the top motivators. The average weighted value for job satisfaction on a scale of 100 points was 27.4 points. The relationship between labor costs and employee satisfaction was strong. Low levels of satisfaction are costlier for employers than high levels of satisfaction. The originality of this study lies in its determination of how strongly employees perceive each aspect of job satisfaction and its correlation to the economic performance of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Bodescu & Alexandru-Dragoş Robu & Andy Felix Jităreanu & Ioan Puiu & Andrei Mihai Gafencu & Florin Daniel Lipşa, 2022. "Work Satisfaction in the Food Industry—A Premise for Economic Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1015-:d:861986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weihui Fu, 2014. "The Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction on Ethical Behavior of Chinese Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 137-144, June.
    2. Ion Popa & Simona Catalina Stefan & Catalina Florentina Albu & stefan Catalin Popa & Cristian Vlad, 2020. "The Impact of National Culture on Employees' Attitudes Toward Heavy Work Investment: Comparative Approach Romania vs. Japan," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1014-1014, November.
    3. Mirela CRISTEA & Daniela Emanuela DĂNĂCICĂ & Graţiela Georgiana NOJA, 2021. "Emigration Decision and the Migration Profile of the Unemployed: A Case Study on Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 94-111, June.
    4. Federica Origo & Laura Pagani, 2008. "Workplace flexibility and job satisfaction: some evidence from Europe," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 539-566, September.
    5. Malina-Ionela BURLACU & Alexandru BIRSAN, 2016. "The Monthly Salary As A Motivational Factor From The Perpective Of The Degree Of Satisfaction And The Quality Of Life," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 418-427, November.
    6. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Simona-Andreea Apostu & Andreea Paul & Ionut Casuneanu, 2020. "Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-53, July.
    7. Maria Saleem & Faisal Qadeer & Faisal Mahmood & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Heesup Han, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Employee Green Behavior: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Bindu Gupta & Sahil Joshi & Mohit Agarwal, 2012. "The Effect of Expected Benefit and Perceived Cost on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Study of IT Employees in India," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 3(1).
    9. Gheorghe Epuran & Gabriel Bratucu & Oana Barbulescu & Nicoleta Andreea Neacsu & Anca Madar, 2018. "Food Safety and Sustainability ? An Exploratory Approach at the Level of the Romanian Wine Production Companies," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 20(47), pages 151-151, February.
    10. Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Liviu Stelian Begu, 2019. "Youth reservation wages in Romania: are wage expectations realistic?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(14), pages 1157-1161, August.
    11. Michael Rose, 2005. "Job Satisfaction in Britain: Coping with Complexity," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 455-467, September.
    12. Alina Butu & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Steliana Rodino & Ioan-Sebastian Brumă & Lucian Tanasă & Marian Butu, 2019. "The Anthropological Analysis of the Key Determinants on the Purchase Decision Taken by the Romanian Consumers Regarding the Ecological Agroalimentary Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Timpanaro, 2023. "Agricultural Food Marketing, Economics and Policies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-9, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunmin Choe & Yongwon Kim & Sungok Moon, 2022. "The Effect of Labor Flexibility on Financial Performance in Korea: The Moderating Effect of Labor Relations Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Hyo-Sun Jung & Hye-Hyun Yoon, 2021. "Generational Effects of Workplace Flexibility on Work Engagement, Satisfaction, and Commitment in South Korean Deluxe Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Kwame Owusu Boakye & Isaac Nyarko Adu & Michael Kyei-Frimpong & Evelyn Twumasi, 2024. "Gaining competitive advantage through integrated talent development and engagement practices in the telecommunication sector; the mediating role of corporate image," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Dawson Chris & Veliziotis Michail & Hopkins Benjamin, 2014. "Assimilation of the migrant work ethic," Working Papers 20141407, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    5. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    6. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    7. Anna Lewandowska & Zia Ullah & Fatima Saleh AlDhaen & Esra AlDhaen & Alina Yakymchuk, 2023. "Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    8. C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Michael Neureiter, 2023. "Corporate Purpose and Employee Sustainability Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 963-981, April.
    9. Pekkan Nazmiye Ulku & Bicer Mehmet, 2022. "Ethical Climate’s Mediating Role on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 115-132, March.
    10. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Pudney, Stephen & Conti, Gabriella, 2008. "If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands! Survey design and the analysis of satisfaction," ISER Working Paper Series 2008-39, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Bengt Furåker & Mattias Bengtsson, 2013. "Collective and individual benefits of trade unions: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 548-565, November.
    13. Faisal Mahmood & Faisal Qadeer & Usman Sattar & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Maria Saleem & Jaffar Aman, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Financial Performance: A New Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Agnieszka Springer, 2011. "Chosen factors affecting employees' satisfaction (Wybrane czynniki ksztaltujace satysfakcje pracownika)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(34a), pages 162-180.
    16. Bindu Chhabra, 2013. "Locus Of Control As A Moderator In The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment: A Study Of Indian It Professionals," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    17. Věroslav Holuša & Michal Vaněk & Filip Beneš & Jiří Švub & Pavel Staša, 2023. "Virtual Reality as a Tool for Sustainable Training and Education of Employees in Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Adilah Mazlan & Nur Atiqah Rochin Demong, 2024. "Impact of Remuneration and Motivation on Employee Performance Amidst The COVID-19 Pandemic," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 344-358.
    19. Khalil M. A. Almuayad & Youzhen Chen, 2024. "Effect of Knowledge Management on Employee Job Performance in Yemeni Banking Sector: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 16913-16942, December.
    20. Bruna Ferrara & Martina Pansini & Clara De Vincenzi & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1015-:d:861986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.