IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i12p1259-d700780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural and Foodstuff Trade between EU28 and Russia: (Non)Uniformity of the Russian Import Ban Impact Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Krivko

    (Department of Economics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Luboš Smutka

    (Department of Trade and Finance, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The distribution of the impact of the Russian import ban on the EU28 countries is not uniform. The market shares and clustering of the EU28 countries changed before and after the introduction of the ban. Although the Russian import ban was introduced as a countermeasure to Western sectoral and individual sanctions, the ban’s impact on EU28 economies is not parallel, and the impact is not evenly distributed among EU members. Cluster analysis shows that two groups of countries can be distinguished, with Group 2 having the most severe impact from the ban (on average, a decrease of 48% in the trade balance with Russia). Our results show that Germany, the Netherlands, Latvia, Lithuania, Italy and Poland are the countries which have experienced the largest Russian import ban impact and bear up to 63% of total EU28 losses due to the ban. Some of the countries (Austria, Hungary, Czechia) did not stop expanding trade after the import ban, and they could be the ones to see the first benefits once the ban is lifted.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Krivko & Luboš Smutka, 2021. "Agricultural and Foodstuff Trade between EU28 and Russia: (Non)Uniformity of the Russian Import Ban Impact Distribution," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1259-:d:700780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen K. Wegren & Christel Elvestad, 2018. "Russia’s food self-sufficiency and food security: an assessment," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 565-587, September.
    2. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    3. Svetlana Fedoseeva & Roland Herrmann, 2019. "The price of sanctions: An empirical analysis of German export losses due to the Russian agricultural ban," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(4), pages 417-431, December.
    4. Djuric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Glauben, Thomas, 2015. "Trade Diversion and High Food Prices: The Impact of the Russian Pig Meat Import Ban," 2015: Trade and Societal Well-Being, December 13-15, 2015, Clearwater Beach, Florida 229240, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Dreger, Christian & Kholodilin, Konstantin A. & Ulbricht, Dirk & Fidrmuc, Jarko, 2016. "Between the Hammer and the Anvil: The Impact of Economic Sanctions and Oil Prices on Russia’s Ruble," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 295-308.
    6. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Jeffrey J. Schott & Kimberly Ann Elliott, 2009. "Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd Edition (paper)," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 4129, January.
    7. Mikhail Krivko & Luboš Smutka, 2020. "Trade Sanctions and Agriculture Support in Milk and Dairy Industry: Case of Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Djuric, Ivan & Gotz, Linde & Glauben, Thomas, 2015. "The Imlact of the Russian Import Ban on Domestic Pig Meat Prices in Russia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211579, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Banse, Martin & Duric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Laquai, Verena, 2019. "From the Russian food import ban to free trade from Lisbon to Vladivostok - will farmers benefit?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 20-31.
    10. Kaemfer, William H & Lowenberg, Anton D, 1988. "The Theory of International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(4), pages 786-793, September.
    11. Nathanaël Randriamihamison & Nathalie Vialaneix & Pierre Neuvial, 2021. "Applicability and Interpretability of Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering With or Without Contiguity Constraints," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(2), pages 363-389, July.
    12. Loginova D. & Uzun Vasily, 2016. "Russian food embargo: minor losses in western countries," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 9, pages 32-37, September.
    13. Tleubayev, A. & Jaghdani, T. Jamali & Gotz, L. & Svanidze, M., 2018. "The effects of trade policy on domestic dairy market: the case of Russian food import ban on regional cheese market integration in Russia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277373, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Alexandre Gohin, 2017. "Quel coût des embargos russes sur les produits alimentaires ?," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(1), pages 71-91.
    15. Gurvich, Evsey & Prilepskiy, Ilya, 2015. "The impact of financial sanctions on the Russian economy," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 359-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingru Sun & Meiyi Hou & Shuaiwei Shi & Liwei Cui & Zenglei Xi, 2022. "The Influence of Country Risks on the International Agricultural Trade Patterns Based on Network Analysis and Panel Data Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mikhail Krivko & Luboš Smutka, 2020. "Trade Sanctions and Agriculture Support in Milk and Dairy Industry: Case of Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Daria Loginova & Judith Irek, 2022. "Russian meat price transmission and policy interventions in 2014," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Ankudinov, Andrei & Ibragimov, Rustam & Lebedev, Oleg, 2017. "Sanctions and the Russian stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 150-162.
    4. Loginova, Daria, 2022. "Assessing the Short-term Effect of Exchange Rate Liberalisation on Food Import Prices: The Regression Discontinuity in Time Employed for Russian Food Markets in 2014," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 3(3), September.
    5. Jakub Horak, 2021. "Sanctions as a Catalyst for Russia’s and China’s Balance of Trade: Business Opportunity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Do, Manh Hung, 2021. "Impact of economic sanctions and counter-sanctions on the Russian Federation’s trade," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 267-278.
    7. Luboš Smutka & Josef Abrhám, 2022. "The impact of the Russian import ban on EU agrarian exports," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 39-49.
    8. Joakim Gullstrand, 2020. "What goes around comes around: The effects of sanctions on Swedish firms in the wake of the Ukraine crisis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 2315-2342, September.
    9. Anna Miromanova, 2023. "The effectiveness of embargoes: Evidence from Russia," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 906-940, April.
    10. Klomp, Jeroen, 2020. "The impact of Russian sanctions on the return of agricultural commodity futures in the EU," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Oliver Fritz & Elisabeth Christen & Franz Sinabell & Julian Hinz, 2017. "Russia's and the EU's Sanctions. Economic and Trade Effects, Compliance and the Way Forward," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60669, April.
    12. Anna Garashchuk & Fernando Isla Castillo & Pablo Podadera Rivera, 2022. "The Empirical Evidence of EU–Russia Bilateral Trade under Sanctions and Oil Price Shocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Banse, Martin & Duric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Laquai, Verena, 2019. "From the Russian food import ban to free trade from Lisbon to Vladivostok - will farmers benefit?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 20-31.
    15. Barseghyan, Gayane, 2019. "Sanctions and counter-sanctions : What did they do?," BOFIT Discussion Papers 24/2019, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    16. Jin Mun Jeong & Dursun Peksen, 2019. "Domestic Institutional Constraints, Veto Players, and Sanction Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(1), pages 194-217, January.
    17. Jerg Gutmann & Matthias Neuenkirch & Florian Neumeier, 2024. "Political Economy of International Sanctions," Research Papers in Economics 2024-07, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    18. William Seitz & Alberto Zazzaro, 2020. "Sanctions and public opinion: The case of the Russia-Ukraine gas disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 817-843, October.
    19. Bijoy Chandra Das & Fakhrul Hasan & Soma Rani Sutradhar & Sujana Shafique, 2023. "Ukraine–Russia Conflict and Stock Markets Reactions in Europe," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 395-407, September.
    20. Hinz, Julian & Monastyrenko, Evgenii, 2022. "Bearing the cost of politics: Consumer prices and welfare in Russia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1259-:d:700780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.