IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i1p991-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour Productivity and Employment in Agriculture in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Wlodzimierz Kolodziejczak

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study is to estimate the level of agricultural employment at which labour input productivity is equal to non-agricultural productivity, i.e. in a situation of intersectoral labour productivity equilibrium. Design/methodology/approach: This paper considers agricultural labour inputs in the context of their productivity as measured by gross value added (GVA) per AWU. The level of agricultural employment at which GVA per AWU in agriculture will equal the GVA created by 1 AWU outside agriculture is sought. This is conventionally referred to in the article as 'optimal' employment. Excess employment above this level is called "unproductive" employment in the article. The calculated employment level does not take into account the actual demand for labour. It is therefore a reference point in the formulation of policies for the evolution of the sectoral structure of employment and not its objective sensu stricto. Findings: The existence of potential over-employment is a common phenomenon in the EU, but it places more of a burden on less developed and less prosperous countries. The situation varies between countries. The relatively largest scale of overemployment in agriculture concerns Romania, Bulgaria and Poland, so the pursuit of optimal employment will be most difficult in these countries. The technologically determined labour demand in EU agriculture is higher than the calculated "optimal" level and varies seasonally. It is therefore necessary to strive in parallel to reduce labour demand and shape the "flexibility" of agriculture-related workers so that they can earn income from outside agriculture at times when their work is not necessary on the farms, and make up for labour shortages at times when work on the farms is concentrated. Practical implications: modernisation and structural transformation processes in agriculture should continue to be supported. Support mechanisms should include, above all, the modernisation of production technologies, the implementation of innovations replacing human labour, including digitisation and artificial intelligence solutions, land concentration and complementary measures, i.e. the increase in the importance of services in production processes and the merging of farmers into production cooperatives and producer groups. Vocational education in rural areas should also be promoted, aimed at better matching the skills of the agricultural population with the needs of the non-agricultural labour market, and communication barriers should be countered so that reaching non-agricultural jobs does not mean having to move to the city or make long and costly commutes. Another area is the stimulation of non-agricultural or agriculture-related economic activities. Originality/value: The contribution of the article comes from setting a benchmark for the 'optimal' level of employment in EU agriculture and from estimating the distance between agricultural labour productivity in individual EU countries and non-agricultural sectors. The article also shows the differences that exist in this respect between the countries studied and points out the resulting practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Wlodzimierz Kolodziejczak, 2025. "Labour Productivity and Employment in Agriculture in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 991-1009.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:991-1009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3949/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allison Borchers & Jennifer Ifft & Todd Kuethe, 2014. "Linking the Price of Agricultural Land to Use Values and Amenities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1307-1320.
    2. Plantinga, Andrew J. & Lubowski, Ruben N. & Stavins, Robert N., 2002. "The effects of potential land development on agricultural land prices," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 561-581, November.
    3. Emilia Herman, 2024. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Impact on the Rural Development in EU Countries: A Multivariate Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Christiaensen, Luc & Rutledge, Zachariah & Taylor, J. Edward, 2021. "Viewpoint: The future of work in agri-food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Oana Coca & Diana Creangă & Ștefan Viziteu & Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Gavril Ștefan, 2023. "Analysis of the Determinants of Agriculture Performance at the European Union Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Lawson, Stephanie J. & Gleim, Mark R. & Perren, Rebeca & Hwang, Jiyoung, 2016. "Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2615-2623.
    7. Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka, 2016. "The Role Of Agriculture In The National Economy Of Eu Countries," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 42(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xin, 2016. "The Farmland Valuation Revisited," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Allan, Corey & Kerr, Suzi & Owen, Sally, 2020. "Over-valued or over-looked? A theoretical and empirical investigation of agricultural land values against profitability in Aotearoa New Zealand," Working Paper Series 9129, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    3. Ayala Wineman & Thomas S Jayne, 2018. "Land Prices Heading Skyward? An Analysis of Farmland Values across Tanzania," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 187-214.
    4. Ariel Ortiz‐Bobea, 2020. "The Role of Nonfarm Influences in Ricardian Estimates of Climate Change Impacts on US Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 934-959, May.
    5. Bigelow, Daniel P. & Kuethe, Todd, 2023. "The impact of preferential farmland taxation on local public finances," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Plogmann, Jana & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Farmland sales under returns and price uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Allan, Corey & Kerr, Suzi & Owen, Sally, 2020. "Over-valued or over-looked? A theoretical and empirical investigation of agricultural land values against profitability in Aotearoa New Zealand," Working Paper Series 21087, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    8. B. James Deaton & Chad Lawley, 2022. "A survey of literature examining farmland prices: A Canadian focus," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(2), pages 95-121, June.
    9. Emma Bruno & Rosalia Castellano & Gennaro Punzo & Luca Salvati, 2024. "Direct and spillover effects of short‐ and long‐term land pricing drivers: Evidence from Italian districts, 1992−2019," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 804-839, June.
    10. Steven Stillman, 2005. "Examining Changes in the Value of Rural Land in New Zealand between 1989 and 2003," Urban/Regional 0509015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Mônica A. Haddad & Gary Taylor & Francis Owusu, 2010. "Locational Choices of the Ethanol Industry in the Midwest Corn Belt," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(1), pages 74-86, February.
    12. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    13. Schilling, Brian J. & Sullivan, Kevin P. & Duke, Joshua M., 2013. "Do Residual Development Options Increase Preserved Farmland Values?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-17.
    14. Callahan, Scott & Ifft, Jennifer & Michaud, Clayton P., 2022. "The impact of countercyclical farm programs on agricultural land values," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322579, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Diao, Xinshen & Magalhaes, Eduardo & Silver, Jed, 2019. "Cities and rural transformation: A spatial analysis of rural livelihoods in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 141-157.
    16. Letort, Élodie & Temesgen, Chalachew, 2014. "Influence of environmental policies on farmland prices in the Bretagne region of France," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(01).
    17. Aremu, Olayinka & Fabry, Anna & Meemken, Eva-Marie, 2024. "Farm size and the quality and quantity of jobs—Insights from Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Stefan Seifert & Christoph Kahle & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Price Dispersion in Farmland Markets: What Is the Role of Asymmetric Information?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1545-1568, August.
    19. Schaefers, Tobias & Leban, Marina & Vogt, Florian, 2022. "On-demand features: Consumer reactions to tangibility and pricing structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 751-761.
    20. Dowling, Katharina & Manchanda, Puneet & Spann, Martin, 2021. "The existence and persistence of the pay-per-use bias in car sharing services," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 329-342.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labour productivity; labour input; agricultural employment; gross value added; European Union; international comparisons.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J43 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Agricultural Labor Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:991-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.